I was reading in the other threads a lot of discussions on AMD product pricing, specially the suspected low-price 100-140$ Phenom 9100 and triple cores.
Supposing AMD loses money on each of these processors. Suppose this on every Dell machine as for example.
But each AMD CPU needs an AM2 mobo with chipset, which in part -in the case of Dell alone- could be an AMD chipset, as I don't really know any better alternative for a new rig.
Could AMD compensate in the sale of the whole combo? (lets say, money they lose on the CPU be recovered by the chipset).
Also, is every user buying those fancy ATI cards when they decide to go AMD 700 series motherboard?
Maybe AMD has a point on pricing their CPUs so low. Also, nobody really can confirm AMD losing money for this.
Whats your thought on this? is AMD being saved by the spider combo tri-equation?
Supposing AMD loses money on each of these processors. Suppose this on every Dell machine as for example.
But each AMD CPU needs an AM2 mobo with chipset, which in part -in the case of Dell alone- could be an AMD chipset, as I don't really know any better alternative for a new rig.
Could AMD compensate in the sale of the whole combo? (lets say, money they lose on the CPU be recovered by the chipset).
Also, is every user buying those fancy ATI cards when they decide to go AMD 700 series motherboard?
Maybe AMD has a point on pricing their CPUs so low. Also, nobody really can confirm AMD losing money for this.
Whats your thought on this? is AMD being saved by the spider combo tri-equation?