Ad
News

AMD's 790GX served with secret sauce for overclocking

Published on August 08, 2008

Reykjavik (Iceland) – AMD introduced its 790GX chipset and refreshed the 790FX today. Reviews of 790GX motherboards have been published by the usual suspects but there is one trend that especially has caught our interest: AMD goes after extreme... Read more

Social networking sites a ticking security time bomb, study indicates

Published on October 04, 2006

Social networking websites such as MySpace and Facebook may pose more security risks than physical threats such as sexual predators contacting kids and teenagers. A survey raises the concern that fraud, identity theft and computer spyware and viruses combined with negligent user behavior could flourish on social networking sites. Read more

Helping Your Mac Pro Run A Little Faster

Published on June 30, 2008

Chicago (IL) - Overclocking Macs is not really a topic you read very often about and at least to our knowledge, there is no tool to increase the clock speed of a Mac in a simple way. Read more

UK could force convicted sex offenders to register screen names

Published on February 06, 2007

Convicted sex offenders in the United Kingdom could be forced to register their screen names along with their email addresses. Home Office Secretary John Reid has proposed a new law that would mandate prison terms for sex offenders who fail to give their online identities to the nationwide Sex Offenders Register. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?

Published on October 24, 2008

We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more

Benchmarking With Intel's NAS Toolkit

Published on October 23, 2008

We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » Cooler and Heatsinks » Risks of Overclocking? "Overclock Fail!"
 

Risks of Overclocking? "Overclock Fail!"




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Risks of Overclocking? "Overclock Fail!"
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

Hi


im a new on the overclockign world, but i have some doubs that really worry me i would be glad if some experienced members could enlight me a bit.

my system

Qx9650 + Asus P5E3 Deluxe with 2gb xms corsair 1333 ddr3 memory
HSF thermal take V1 using Artic silver 5 Thermal conpound

this are my doubs

this morning i tried to overclock merely raising the muliplier and the FSB, i tried multiplier on 11 and FSB on 400. but it failed.

since i successful overclocked to 3.8ghz from raising the fsb to 350 and multiplier to 11 and leaving everything else on auto

I made tests and the processor stayed cool 54c on full load, so i wanted to reach 4ghz just for testing pourposes

I read some where that other users having the same systen configuration as me wouldnt reach the 360 to 390 fsb cause it ill fail, and i read someone said they succesful oc to 4.x ghz raising multiplier to 11 and the fsb to 400

So i tryed that but fail.... ok this its what really scared me when the overclock fails, when i turn it on it ill be auto restarting in a loop untill it bios for some reason i dont know finaly boot.

then shows on the screen overclock fail! and says invald cpuvid (i left the CPUVID in auto)

my question "its that normal?" what i have to do in case of overlock fail its that safe or should i panic that?.

my other question its does the procesor surfer off some kind of stress by using overclock at stock voltage? (excluding temperature of course), for example if i have a procesor overclocked but i have nice cooler and it satsys as cool as a stock clocked procesor with a stock cooler will my procesor surfer some kind of aditional stress to the stock one, staying at the same temperature?

I been reading for several hours here on toms hardware and many other sites b4 even try to overclock but couldnt get this doubs off.

Thanks in advance. :sweat:


Message edited by alphadan on 08-13-2008 at 10:27:33 PM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Noob? Currently on Sabbatical!
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Stock voltage? LOL, I will tell you what, if it is on auto, it sure isn't stock any more.

So you tried to merely raise the FSB and multiplier. Well, one you multiply the multiplier times the FSB you get the speed, so it failed because you tried 4.4 Ghz with the voltage on Auto. Auto is no good for upper over clocks.

When the OC fails, and you see the message after a re boot, it means that the system actually hung up, and couldn't do anything, and a safety feature kicks in and un does the over clock, so you can enter the BIOS again.

"Stock" voltage is your VID. VID has nothing to do with voltage in this aspect, other than it will have an imprinted value on that chip of yours!

You can go into the bios and disable speed step, C1E and EIST, and then hit windows and run either Real temp, or Core Temp, and either will list your VID.

You mention leaving the "cpuvid" on auto. Auto will add voltage as you over clock, so being on auto just means that YOU have no control over fine tuning of voltages! So who knows what auto is using for the core voltage? At least you can use CPUz and look when you are in windows.

The processor can be subject to minor stress, depending on voltage and speed, and heat! But as long as you keep an eye on them, all should be well!

--Lupi

Profile: newbie
More Information

Thx for the info i see now what i was doing wrong.


so the voltage auto, can outpass the procesor spesifications

My name is... V3NOM... and i like cheese.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

ddr3? you do know that for a processor with an FSB of 1333 you dont need 1333 RAM... 667 will do, lol. $25 for ram of that quality :P

Profile: newbie
More Information

V3NOM wrote :

ddr3? you do know that for a processor with an FSB of 1333 you dont need 1333 RAM... 667 will do, lol. $25 for ram of that quality :P

 

UMMM yeah he wants help overclocking. 667 would be fine for stock speeds. Yeah he could just raise the multiplier but a fsb bump is necessary for those high ocs hes apparently gunning for. 1333 may be a bit overkill but then again he bought the extreme edition processor ;)

 

As for the op, its pretty hard to fry modern day cpus as they shut off and throttle before getting damaged. Have you read the sticky on how to oc

 

http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] uals-guide

 

You cant just jump to 4.4 ghz leaving stuff on auto voltages and what not. Go through the guide and learn to gradually up your oc


Message edited by 256gej on 08-14-2008 at 11:35:12 AM
Profile: addict
More Information

Yeah, that's actually pretty normal. I would even say it's desirable when an overclock fails. My first board didn't do anything. It just wouldn't start up, so I would have to change a jumper on the motherboard to reset the cmos.

It's a lot easier when it just resets the settings for you.

Now that is just absolutely ludicrous
Profile: addict
More Information

Make sure to stay away from OCZ platinum 6400 sticks. They work fine @ 400.8 MHz (5:6) but if I try 400fsb (1:1) for the same ram frequency they fail!

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Another common mistake that a lot of people make, is trying to overclock an entire system all at once. How can you effectively trouble shoot a bad overclock when you are jacking the fsb, cpu, and messing with new dividers?

I would drop the multi a couple of notches, then raise the FSB until you achieve a stable FSB to your liking, while testing your ram for speed and stability. Then once the FSB and memory is stable, start overclocking the cpu. This way your not overclocking everything at once, so when you crash or prime95 craps out, you wont be guessing why.

Profile: newbie
More Information

sportsfanboy 256gej modtech

thx for the help u really clear my doubs, my principal doub was what could i do in case of after overclock fails the system woulnt never boot, i didnt had idea it could be reseted ona jumper on the mobo.

and yes i tried to overclock all at once hehehe ive read that ppl start with somethign and then gradually and ups, the reason why i tried all at once was cause i read someone got it doing that but ill try gradually now that are good tips.

well what can i say im just a newb on overclocking means.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

The only draw back to this method is you need to plan ahead as you tweak the ram and FSB, so when you raise the multiplier back up, your not too low or high.





  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » Cooler and Heatsinks » Risks of Overclocking? "Overclock Fail!"

Go to:
 

Google Ads