Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » My Vista only recognizes 2.8 Gig of my 4 Gig of ram
 

My Vista only recognizes 2.8 Gig of my 4 Gig of ram




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : My Vista only recognizes 2.8 Gig of my 4 Gig of ram
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Anyone know why? I have Vista 32-bit Home Ultimate, and I know it's supposed to support 4 GIG. Why does it only see 2.8 GIG?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Because 32-bit systems cannot read anymore than 3.25Gb of RAM
It's a built in system limitation.
Which is why 64-bit systems are available for those who want more.

With a 32-bit system, you'll read ~2.75-3.25 Gb of RAM maximum, dependant upon your computer.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Ah, I heard it was 4 gig...

Profile: newbie
More Information

Some memory is reserved for system service and devices at POST time.

But as I've read, SP1 will make Vista report all 4 Gigs but not make use of it all.

Profile: old hand
More Information

None of those are true. 32bit windows OS sees 4GB of ALL physical memory. This includes lots of things about address space that I am ueducated on but memory allocated to video and the works, to include memory physically residing on your GPU.


---------------
Exchange Engineer - Am I working to live, or am I living to work?
Profile: addict
More Information

you must have a lot of video ram to address as well
perhaps SLI setup?


---------------
Invented a new file compression... remove all the '0'. They are nothing anyways...
Q6600 O/C to 3.6Ghz wc
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=229261
Can't Stop the Signal!
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

for
the
love
of ALL THAT IS GOOD AND GREAT in this miserable world

can we please have a sticky that explains this?

honestly...


---------------
Master of 'E'

|GC| Shroom_e
Colonel - Green Clan / |GC| BF2 Division Leader / www.green-clan.net
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

(Thanks to Scotteq for saving this answer on a file so others can post it when this qustion is asked at least once a week. To the mods: can we have a sticky about this using Scotteq's file as the main post?)

  

In 32 bit Windows operating systems, the total addressable space available is 4GB. If you installed total 4GB memory, the system will detect less than 4GB of total memory because of address space allocation for other critical functions, such as:

- System BIOS (including motherboard, add-on cards, etc..)
- Motherboards resources
- Memory mapped I/O
- Configuration for AGP/PCI-Ex/PCI
- Other memory allocations for PCI devices

Different onboard devices and different add-on cards (devices) will result of different total memory size. e.g. more PCI cards installed will require more memory resources, resulting of less memory free for other uses.

This limitation applies to most chipsets & Windows XP/Vista 32-bit version operating systems.

 

If you install a Windows operating system, if more than 3GB memory is required for your system, then the below conditions should be met:

1. The memory controller which supports memory swap functionality is used. The latest chipsets like Intel 975X, 955X, Nvidia NF4 SLI Intel Edition, Nvidia NF4 SLI X16, AMD K8 and newer architectures can support the memory swap function.

2. Windows XP Pro X64 Ed. (64-bit), Windows Vista 64, or other OS which can address more than 4GB memory.



Note: According to the latest Change Log published my Microsoft, Windows Vista 32bit SP1 will display the installed amount of RAM. This is a display change only.


Message edited by runswindows95 on 03-14-2008 at 10:39:11 PM
What You See Is What You Get
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Definitely an SLi or Crossfire setup.. Thats the only way to reduce the OS memory that much.


Go to:
 
  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » My Vista only recognizes 2.8 Gig of my 4 Gig of ram

Google Ads
Ad
News

Acer readies full range Vista-certified LCD monitors

Published on January 29, 2007

Ahead of the official launch of Windows Vista operating system (OS), Acer now offers a full range of LCD monitors, with sizes ranging from widescreen 20, 22, 24 to 26 inches, ready and tested by WHQL (Windows Hardware Quality Labs) for Windows Vista compliance, according to the company. Read more

ASRock announces motherboard with Vista Premium logo

Published on October 17, 2006

ASRock recently announced that its ConRoeXFire-eSATA2 motherboard officially received the Windows Vista Premium logo, which makes it among the first Vista Premium motherboards in the world. Read more

Alienware announces Vista overhaul

Published on January 30, 2007

Alienware, a specialty maker of top-end gaming PCs, has thrown its hat into the big Vista ring, now offering the new operating system on its compatible PCs as part of the large-scale Vista launch. Read more

Microsoft details Vista's media features

Published on April 24, 2006

Microsoft on Monday detailed innovations coming in Windows Vista that the company believes makes the operating system superior in the delivery of multimedia. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Atom, Athlon, or Nano? Energy-Savers Compared

Published on October 03, 2008

We compared Intel’s Atom 230 and VIA’s Nano L2100 processors hoping to find the best product for low-power applications. VIA is in the vanguard of performance. Is this enough to beat Atom? Read more

Interview: Bigfoot's Killer NIC, Exposed

Published on October 02, 2008

Since its release, the Killer NIC has garnered a reputation for being an extravagant and largely unnecessary add-on for the do-it-yourselfer. Seeking additional insight, we approached the card's designer. Read more

Seagate's 1.5TB Barracuda: Bigger And Better?

Published on October 02, 2008

Seagate is the first hard drive vendor to offer a 1.5 TB drive in the 3.5” form factor. Meanwhile, WD sent us its RAID Edition 3 (RE3) drive. We tell you which is the best HDD choice today. Read more

Updated CPU Charts 2008: AMD Versus Intel

Published on October 01, 2008

The processor is the heart of your PC, and our updated charts for Q3 2008 show 54 of them competing in terms of performance. Using our updated suite of benchmarks, compare your favorite AMD and Intel CPUs after reading this introduction. Read more