Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Kingston packs data recovery software on Compact Flash cards

Published on August 15, 2006

Kingston today said that will be upgrading its "ultimate" line of Compact Flash (CF) cards by preloading Ontrack's Easy Recovery Professional software 6.1 onto the devices. Read more

Abit recalls AN9 32X motherboards

Published on July 21, 2006

Abit today said that its quality control department found that "rough handling during shipments" may have damaged "a small number of units from the early manufacturing of the AN9 32X product line." Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

4GB Gets Cheap: 9 Dual-Channel Kits Compared

Published on December 01, 2008

Recent price drops have made 4 GB DDR2 dual-channel kits affordable for even the most cost-conscious buyers. We pushed nine models to their limits to determine best value for a broad range of users. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 damaged or SystemROM?
 

Q6600 damaged or SystemROM?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 damaged or SystemROM?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have had a gentle overclock on my Q6600 of about 2.67GHz. Temps were always fine at both idle and load. Couple days ago, I'm playing with some cmos settings, and I notice the CPU multiplier in the ASUS P5NE-SLI motherboard is highlighted as an option for the Q6600. I never paid attention to it before, because my E6600 had it grayed out.

Now I know, Intel doesn't unlock lower end CPU's but I deviously tried my way. I set the multiplier to x8 and my FSB to a conservative 1100mhz (which in theory would under clock it, below its 2.4 stock). As I finished up with my settings I checked SAVE and EXIT. Although, instead of just exiting and rebooting a small message displayed saying something along the lines of "Rewriting system rom for new settings, please do not turn off or reboot your machine".

Ever since I attempted the x8 multiplier and saw that message I am not able to have any settings I fix in the cmos to translate into actual results within Windows. The computer boots and runs perfectly normal. However, if I change the FSB in the cmos from 1066 to 1100 and save it, when I load into Windows and launch CPU-Z it doesn't net the result. I shows stock speed. I verified the speed in General Computer Properties under My Computer.

The speed and timing of my ram is also not affected. Clueless, I loaded default settings and flashed the bios with the most up to date version. Still nothing. Did I some how defunct the motherboard's rom somehow?

I can't image I abused the CPU because the Ram also loses the translation of settings from cmos to windows.

Anyone have a clue?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

All I can say is WOW. I'm pretty stumped on what this all means. Your email is pretty concise, and you seem knowledgable enough to recognize what you should have seen and what you are seeing. Have you tried shutting down your computer, unplugging it for a minute so that the computer loses all power, and try again? Other than that I have no idea what to say. Sounds crazy to think you broke something.

Just a quick afterthought though. You had your Q6600 at 2.67Ghz, which is a gentle overclock like you stated. I'm not sure what settings you chose to use to get 2.67Ghz, but Q6600 stock speed is 2.40Ghz(9 x 266.6Mhz)

You said you set it to 1100Mhz with a multiplier of 8. That would mean a true FSB speed of 275Mhz, and CPU speed of 2.20Ghz. It is an underclock for the CPU, but a slight overclock for the motherboard.

Now, since you overclocked it to 2.67Ghz I can't possibly imagine that a 2.67Ghz overclock wouldn't hurt anything, but your 8x275 would?

That makes me wonder wtf to think. I honestly don't have any guesses except failed/failing motherboard.


---------------
The smartest people don't know the most but realize what their true knowledge limits really are. -Me
Profile: stranger
More Information

Try to reset the bios on the motherboard with the 3 pin jumper. Your manual should have instructions for this and you can find some stuff online too.
If this doesn't work try to update your bios to the newer version with the Asus utility in windows or in command prompt.
This is a weird problem that i haven't seen before. I hope this helps.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Reset the Cmos to go back to normal.

Doh, someone beat me to it.

Also download the newest Bios, while your at it.


Message edited by roadrunner197069 on 08-15-2008 at 07:06:34 PM
Profile: member
More Information

Remove the motherboard battery for a minute or so. I know using the jumper does the same, but I have had problems with my mobo in the past and the jumper could not solve my problem, but removing the battery could.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 damaged or SystemROM?

Go to:
 

Google Ads