good non-gaming vid card - max $60

plasticsman1

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2008
10
0
18,510
I'm am building my first computer and need a little help. Right now I am planning on a AMD Athlon x2 6000, 2 GB memory (dual channel), 200GB hard.
I don't have a clue what video card would be good for this. I generally do internet, word processing, photos and maybe transfer home movies to DVD in future.
Also is the CPU overkill - any recommendations appreciated.

Thanks
 

marvelous211

Distinguished
Aug 15, 2006
1,153
0
19,280
Why not build Intel system which would be faster.

$60 gaming card? You would be playing low resolutions and low everything. A used 7600gt or something?
 

pinaplex

Distinguished
Aug 21, 2007
474
0
18,860



If you re-read the topic and the OP. it says NON-GAMING video card.

to the OP....Check out the Nvidia 8400, or 8500 series. you might be even able to pull an 8600gt for $60 with rebate if you look hard enough.
 

plasticsman1

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2008
10
0
18,510
Thanks pinaplex!

Are the 8400 or 8500 fairly quiet? I am looking for something fairly quiet and that doesn't run hot. Maybe heat won't be a problem for what I will doing.
 

pinaplex

Distinguished
Aug 21, 2007
474
0
18,860
yea, those don't run hot at all, and are made more for multimedia stuff like watching dvd's, etc. you can find many of them with passive cooling.
 

plasticsman1

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2008
10
0
18,510
Guys I found a couple of ones and would some opinions on them.

XFX - 8400GS - 256MB - $38
XFX - 8500GT - 512MB - $57

Should I go with the cheaper one or not? Both are passive cooling. I don't know what the GS and GT means on the end.
 

quantumsheep

Distinguished
Dec 10, 2005
2,341
0
19,790
If you're wanting a quiet system ditch the 6000+, they run very hot which means even with decent cooling it'll still be relatively noisy.

I recommend either an Intel E6750 or something similar.
 

plasticsman1

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2008
10
0
18,510
I am trying to stay away from Intel due to cost. What about a 5200+? Does it run hot? I can get it for $30 less than the 6000+.
 

tjhva

Distinguished
Mar 28, 2006
80
0
18,630

tlmck

Distinguished
For your uses I would scrap the vid card and get a 690v motherboard. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813128043 2gb ddr2 800 ram would be good as well.

The onboard video is more than adequate for your tasks. It also makes no noise.

For the processor the best bang for the buck AMD's right now are these. http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2%2050001028%2040000343%201050717007%201051720996%201263016683%201050923825&bop=And&CompareItemList=N82E16819103774%2CN82E16819103212
 

turboflame

Distinguished
Aug 6, 2006
1,046
0
19,290


The 65nm version of the 5200+ that runs @ 2.7ghz would only consume 65W while the older 90nm 6000+ has a TDP of 125W.

So it should be significantly cooler.
 

plasticsman1

Distinguished
Feb 9, 2008
10
0
18,510
I have been doing alot of looking today and am leaning towards an Intel E4500, ASUS P5KPL-VM motherboard. Would this be cooler and faster than that AMD 6000+? I am also leaning towards just using integrated video at first and then determine if I need a separate one. Since I am not going to be doing gaming, maybe this would be no problem.

Any thoughts?
 

xlfirstclass

Distinguished
Dec 2, 2006
25
0
18,530
I would stay with the AMD system if you don't plan on overclocking. If you plan on overclocking then I would go with an Intel system.