The Inquirer reports:
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/02/23/intel-readies-six-core-chip
As an AMD fan, I've wondered why AMD couldn't do quad cores at 65nm like Intel, but read somewhere that hypertransport made that unworkable. Now, isn't nehalem supposed to have Intel's version of hypertransport? Then, how does this pave the way for nehalem if it's 3 dual core CPU's in one package? Will it rely upon the fsb to communicate with memory?
All very interesting, if true. If AMD did the same, we could see six cores made from two Phenom 8xxx's in one package. Makes me think that 8 core Intel CPU's aren't that far away, even if they're the nehalem equivalent to the Pentium D or Q6600 in packaging. This will be more bad news for Phenom, unless AMD pulls a 45nm rabbit out of it's hat.
CHIP FIRM Intel is preparing to introduce a six core chip called the "Dunnington", a processor that will pave the way for its Nehalem architecture later this year.
According to Eclipse, the “Dunnington” was designed in Bangalore, and will use three dual core 45 nanometre Penryn processors with a shared 16MB L3 cache.
It will use the “Clarksboro” chipset, the report said.
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/02/23/intel-readies-six-core-chip
As an AMD fan, I've wondered why AMD couldn't do quad cores at 65nm like Intel, but read somewhere that hypertransport made that unworkable. Now, isn't nehalem supposed to have Intel's version of hypertransport? Then, how does this pave the way for nehalem if it's 3 dual core CPU's in one package? Will it rely upon the fsb to communicate with memory?
All very interesting, if true. If AMD did the same, we could see six cores made from two Phenom 8xxx's in one package. Makes me think that 8 core Intel CPU's aren't that far away, even if they're the nehalem equivalent to the Pentium D or Q6600 in packaging. This will be more bad news for Phenom, unless AMD pulls a 45nm rabbit out of it's hat.