Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » "My god, it's full of stars, ...I mean phenoms"
 

"My god, it's full of stars, ...I mean phenoms"

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2
Previous 
Author
 Thread : "My god, it's full of stars, ...I mean phenoms"
 
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

The speculation is almost over,

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php? [...] 7&Itemid=1

"We learned that AMD plans a massive showcase of Phenom B3 revision at Cebit and that most of AMD’s systems will be powered with these CPUs. We are talking about almost 200 computers that will be spread all around the show.

Phenom B3 revision is the one that doesn’t feature overblown TLB L3 memory issue and it should start shipping in early Q2 2008, at least that is what we’ve been hearing for a while.

Samples of Phenom B3 are finally out and we've also learned that Phenom 9700 at 2.6GHz is now possible and that it will launch with the B3 revision."


Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: member
More Information

hmm Fudzilla the cheeky monkeys. The only reason I'm going to believe this is because i have faith in AMD.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Yea, I have faith in AMD too.
It's Fudzilla that I don't have faith in.

Can you blaim me?


---------------
They mostly come at night. Mostly...
http://s2.battleknight.gr/index.ph [...] f=MzU4NzE=
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

yes i can! lol

Shouldnt believe everything your told of course, but fudzilla come out with the most interesting tit-bits. vr-zone.com are quite good too.

"They mostly come at night. Mostly..." lol are you an Aliens fan or a south park fan? :)

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

So we are hoping this is true. Although I always though the 9700 was a 2.4GHz part and the 9900 was the 2.6GHz part.

And I guess we will have to wait and see if B3 helps performance at all. From the past year I wont hold my breath.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

I dont think it'll be any faster clock-for-clock, theres no reason to think that really, just that it'll be overclockable and stable. What people are waiting for i think is a phenom that will oc to 3.0ghz and be stable. Thats a very signifigant 'magic number'.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

OMG!!!
AMD was able to Produce 200!!! Stable Processors!!!!
OMG!!!
OMG!!!
OMG!!!
2.6Ghz!!!!!!
This is going to REVOLUTIONIZE the computer industry!!!!!!!!


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
Factboy
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

I don't believe Fudzilla. I choose to believe a more reliable source, like AMD themselves. AMD said B3 would be out in January. At first I thought they meant 2008, but I had to second guess myself about 25 days ago.

I think Baron said 3ghz by the end of December too, he must have meant 2008 and not 2007.


But realistically, I don't see volume shipments of B3 until 2H2008



PS - Spoon, awesome title

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Technology Coordinato r on 02-25-2008 at 02:33:31 PM

---------------
http://promotions.newegg.com/Intel/2Over3/478x88.jpg
jsc
Profile: old hand
More Information

If I could cherrypick AMD's production line, I could probably find 200 processors that run stably at 2.6 GHz - even with all four cores working.

I looked at OCing my SNES but chickened out.
Profile: old hand
More Information

jsc wrote :

If I could cherrypick AMD's production line, I could probably find 200 processors that run stably at 2.6 GHz - even with all four cores working.


I can't imagine anything more tedious...

If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

picking cherrys?

If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

TechnologyCoordinator wrote :

I don't believe Fudzilla. I choose to believe a more reliable source, like AMD themselves. AMD said B3 would be out in January. At first I thought they meant 2008, but I had to second guess myself about 25 days ago.

I think Baron said 3ghz by the end of December too, he must have meant 2008 and not 2007.


But realistically, I don't see volume shipments of B3 until 2H2008



PS - Spoon, awesome title



Yeah I reckon 2h2008 for shipments, but it would be nice to see some samples in action en masse.

p.s. Cheers for the complement TC! :love:

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

spoonboy wrote :

The speculation is almost over,

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php? [...] 7&Itemid=1

"We learned that AMD plans a massive showcase of Phenom B3 revision at Cebit and that most of AMD’s systems will be powered with these CPUs. We are talking about almost 200 computers that will be spread all around the show.

Phenom B3 revision is the one that doesn’t feature overblown TLB L3 memory issue and it should start shipping in early Q2 2008, at least that is what we’ve been hearing for a while.

Samples of Phenom B3 are finally out and we've also learned that Phenom 9700 at 2.6GHz is now possible and that it will launch with the B3 revision."



Am I the only one who sees this error? Or do you think its all Fud. IDK but the 9700 is supposed to be 2.4GHz. So which is true. the 9700 or the 2.6GHz. Im going for the 9700 :P


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: addict
More Information

Now, to give fudzilla its dues, it has been right quite often recently.


There is prob a better chance of this happening than not.

jsc
Profile: old hand
More Information

spoonboy wrote :

picking cherrys?


U.S. slang for hand selecting components.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

jimmysmitty wrote :

Am I the only one who sees this error? Or do you think its all Fud. IDK but the 9700 is supposed to be 2.4GHz. So which is true. the 9700 or the 2.6GHz. Im going for the 9700 :P



Good Catch!
I'm wagering on the Phenom 9700 @2.4Ghz.

I expect the Phenom 9900 @2.6Ghz to ship at some point, but I doubt it's going to be moved up that far since AMD has recently stated it was going to be a while.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

jsc wrote :

U.S. slang for hand selecting components.



lol yes i do speak english thankyou and yes we also have that expression in England.

Therefore:

"If I could cherrypick AMD's production line, I could probably find 200 processors that run stably at 2.6 GHz - even with all four cores working.

----------------------------------------------------------

I can't imagine anything more tedious..."

My ANSWER not question: "picking cheeries (perhaps)?"




Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

To OC to 3GHz on a Phenom you need a "cherry picker". For a OC to 3GHz on a Q6600 you don't. kinda makes the decision easy huh?


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Factboy
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

spoonboy wrote :

picking cherrys?




Cherry picking is only picking the best and ignoring the rest. For example, remember when AMD had a press event in November with a bunch of 3.0 ghz Phenoms? You can't even get a Black Edition Phenom that high! AMD Cherry picked 50 processors for the event that could run that high without major issues.

I don't expect to see a significant clock increase from B3. AMD really has one mission with B3, FIX THE TLB! If they can do that, then B3 will be a success. If they somehow aren't able to fix it or create some other issue while fixing it, then it is a failure.

I'd be interested to see if performance changes, clock for clock, with B3. (For example, if the B3 fix is to disable the L3 cache, we may see a performance decrease).


---------------
http://promotions.newegg.com/Intel/2Over3/478x88.jpg
Call me Ishmael.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

TechnologyCoordinator wrote :

Cherry picking is only picking the best and ignoring the rest. For example, remember when AMD had a press event in November with a bunch of 3.0 ghz Phenoms? You can't even get a Black Edition Phenom that high! AMD Cherry picked 50 processors for the event that could run that high without major issues.

I don't expect to see a significant clock increase from B3. AMD really has one mission with B3, FIX THE TLB! If they can do that, then B3 will be a success. If they somehow aren't able to fix it or create some other issue while fixing it, then it is a failure.

I'd be interested to see if performance changes, clock for clock, with B3. (For example, if the B3 fix is to disable the L3 cache, we may see a performance decrease).



Unfortunately we will still probably only see subpar performance.

AMD need