Ad
News

Asteroid's Chances Of Hitting Mars Now 1 In 28

Published on January 03, 2008

Mars is now facing a 1 in 28 chance of being pummeled by a 160 foot diameter asteroid which will have its closest encounter with Mars on or about January 30, 2008. If it ends up being an impact, an orbiting satellite may be in prime position to take close up images of the impact. Read more

Bridgestone close to releasing wireless tire pressure monitoring

Published on August 31, 2006

According to FCC records, Bridgestone is close to releasing their wireless tire pressure monitoring system. The system uses sensors embedded just under the tire rim to send tire pressure and temperature to a handheld device. A 1.5 second alarm is sounded if the pressure is too high or too low. Read more

Intel to ship 'Potomac' Xeon MP this month

Published on March 18, 2005

Intel will ship its 'Potomac' 64-bit Xeon MP processor on 29 March, bundling it with the 'Twin Castle' E8500 chipset into a server platform the company has codenamed 'Truland'. Read more

Intel launches 64-bit Xeon MP Potomac and Cranford processors

Published on March 29, 2005

Intel today introduced a new processor platform "Truland" that will lead the company to dual-core Xeon MP processors: Truland initially brings five new Xeon MP processors with Potomac and Cranford cores as well as the new E8500 chipset. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

The State Of The Personal Computer

Published on November 25, 2008

Where were we in 2008 and where are we heading in 2009? In his State of the Personal Computer address, Alan Dang shares his insights as a user of three different platforms: Mac, Windows, and Linux. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » E8500 OC'd - Are these temp readings right?
 

E8500 OC'd - Are these temp readings right?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : E8500 OC'd - Are these temp readings right?
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hey guys just a quick question, Ive overclocked an e8500 to 400FSB, which is 3.8ghz.
To cool it im using a zalman 7700.
My question is what temperatures should i be seeing? Using speedfan, im getting readings in the mid 40's for the two cores while idling, and im getting around 28-29 CPU temperature. When i load up a game, the two cores temps just to the mid 50's.

I am just wondering if these temperatures are normal, and should I be paying attention to the core temperatures or the cpu temperature?

thanks in advance

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

i think it would be better if you can Prime it and see what the highest temp reading you will get.

Profile: stranger
More Information

i ran a stress test with prime95 and reached temps of 64-65C.
I've read that the max temp for my processor is around the 72 mark.

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

then thats not good.65C is the limit for the 45nm CPU.

Tenacity & Attention to Detail
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Quote :

I've read that the max temp for my processor is around the 72 mark.


frenzal,

Your statement shows a common misconception concerning Intel's Thermal Specifications. While I appreciate iluvgillgill's input on these temperature threads, he usually prefers a brief general comment, rather than writing a complete explanation. Allow me to clarify.

There are 2 seperate sets of temperatures for all Core 2 Processors; CPU temperature (Tcase) and Core temperatures (Tjunction). The Thermal Specification shown in Intel's Processor Spec Finder - http://processorfinder.intel.com/d [...] Spec=SLAPK - is for CPU temperature, not Core temperatures, which is an important point that many users don't realize.

The difference between CPU temperature and Core temperatures is 5c at load, which is illustrated below: From my Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide - http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ture-guide


Section 6: Scale

Scale 1: Duo
E7200: Tcase Max 74c, Stepping M0,TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E4700: Tcase Max 73c, Stepping G0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E4x00: Tcase Max 73c, Stepping M0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E2xx0: Tcase Max 73c, Stepping M0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E8x90: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping C0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E8600: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping E0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E8x00: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping C0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E6x50: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping G0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W
E6540: Tcase Max 72c, Stepping G0, TDP 65W, Idle 8W

-Tcase/Tjunction-
--70--/--75--75-- Hot
--65--/--70--70-- Warm
--60--/--65--65-- Safe
--25--/--30--30-- Cool


As you can see, while iluvgillgill's statement is correct with regard to safe Core temperatures, your Zalamn 7700 is classed as a low-end cooler, and really isn't much better than Intel's stock cooler. Check out the following cooler reviews to see for yourself; from my Temp Guide:

Section 14: Recommendations

For information on CPU Coolers, please use the following links:
http://www.anandtech.com/casecooli [...] i=3068&p=4
http://www.frostytech.com/articlev [...] 271&page=5
http://www.madshrimps.be/?action=g [...] rticID=680

Additionally, you can calibrate SpeedFan for accurate CPU temperature (Tcase) and Core temperatures (Tjunction) by using Section 9: Calibrations in my Temp Guide.


Hope this helps,

Comp :sol:


Message edited by CompuTronix on 08-20-2008 at 08:07:26 PM

---------------
Q9650 @ 4.2 | Xigmatek HDT-SD964
Ambient 22c | CPU 65c | Core 70c
Vcore Load 1.320 | VID 1.1875
Core 2 Quad and Duo Temperature Guide --> http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] ture-guide
You tell me what I do.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

while 65nm i will set 70C as the MAX temp and 45nm will be 65C.as 45nm are more vulnerable to heat and voltage.

Profile: stranger
More Information

I used those guides to get rid of the e8500 stock heatsink/fan and replace it with a Tuniq Tower 120 w/ Artic Silver 5.

Prior to the transition, the two cores were idle around 50. My last reading was 52/48 with Real Temp. When I would run Orthos to load, the cores would hit into the 90's, and once I saw 100's.

After the transition (transitioned last night), it now runs idle at 37/34. When running Orthos to load, it maxes out in the upper 40's. Definitely better heat dissipation.

I haven't done any overclocking yet. Thanks for the post.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » E8500 OC'd - Are these temp readings right?

Go to:
 

Google Ads