Ad
News

Nvidia raises prices of GeForce MX4000 and FX5200 chips

Published on November 01, 2004

Nvidia recently raised the prices of its GeForce MX4000 (NV18) and FX5200 (NV34) graphics chips by about 5%, according to sources at Taiwan graphics-card makers. Read more

Nvidia makes its bucks from Geforce FX series

Published on January 12, 2005

Nvidia is still making most of its margins and profits on previous generations of its cards, according to a story posted at the Inquirer. Read more

Nvidia increases wafer production for entry-level AGP8X chips

Published on May 09, 2005

Nvidia recently placed additional orders for wafer starts at 0.14-micron for its AGP8x-based NV34 (FX5200) graphics chips at Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC), as demand in the entry-level segment remains strong, according to sources. Read more

Nvidia cuts prices on entry-level and mainstream processors

Published on June 16, 2005

Nvidia recently lowered the price of its GeForce 6200 with TurboCache by US$15, according to sources at Taiwan graphics-card makers. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's Holiday Buyer's Guide 2008, Part 4

Published on December 02, 2008

Welcome to part four of our Holiday Gift Guide coverage. This time around, the Tom's Hardware staff picks its favorite components for your wish list rounding out 2008. Read more

4GB Gets Cheap: 9 Dual-Channel Kits Compared

Published on December 01, 2008

Recent price drops have made 4 GB DDR2 dual-channel kits affordable for even the most cost-conscious buyers. We pushed nine models to their limits to determine best value for a broad range of users. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Recently changed from a FX5200 to a 7600 GS AGP.
 

Recently changed from a FX5200 to a 7600 GS AGP.




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Recently changed from a FX5200 to a 7600 GS AGP.
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

After installing my new video card, I promptly ran 3dmarks06 And got a score of 2226 over 174 (lol) with the FX5200.
However, the performance in games, namely WoW and CS:S are still the same as with the FX5200. I'm averaging about 20 to 30 FPS regardless of the video settings ( High med or low).

The rest of my specs are:

2.9GHz Celeron
1GB DDR400 RAM.

I've got no spywares viruses or anything so I'm quite puzzled as to why I'm getting such low performance on those not so recent games.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: addict
More Information

Did you remember to remove the old FX5200 nVidia drivers and install the ones for the 7600GS? That could be important. Your CPU is quite weak, but it shouldn't bottleneck the 7600GS nearly that much.

w00t
Profile: old hand
More Information

Your CPU is serverly limiting performance. I suggest you turn up the graphics a bit, as the Celeron only has a 512k L2 Cache it makes it extremely weak for games and applications. Hence why your not noticing a difference in performance.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Xazax310 wrote :

Your CPU is serverly limiting performance. I suggest you turn up the graphics a bit, as the Celeron only has a 512k L2 Cache it makes it extremely weak for games and applications. Hence why your not noticing a difference in performance.



Download driver cleaner pro and clear all the old drivers and do the restart and then install fresh drivers - see how that goes and post back.


---------------
Q6600@3510/1560 + TT BigTyphoon+Mod
8gb Kingston 800mhz
Gigabyte EP35-DS3P
XFX 8800GT/512
dtq
---------------
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

I believe Ive read around that WoW is very CPU intensive, its possible you are being limited by your cpu rather than your graphics, a 7600 will take just about all that Wow can throw at it at lower resolutions.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the minimum specs for WOW is an 800MHz PIII. Remember that they want lots of people paying money so they can play wow, the lower the system specs, the more money they can rake in. I'm pretty sure a 2+GHz celeron is faster then an 800MHz PIII. I doubt its a driver problem as well, both of those cards use the same driver.

Are you sure about the lack of virus? Are you sure there is no performance gain? (don't forget to check the detail settings.) How much of your memory do you have free? Are your AGP settings correct in the bios? (meaning you are running at 8X, not 1X or PCI mode.) Speaking of which, make sure your harddrives are in DMA mode, not PIO.

Lets start here. There is a performance increase, 3DMark showed it. Now we need to figure out why its not showing in the games.


---------------
The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Profile: Forum Gigolo
More Information

Wow is not very CPU limited, it's more likely intenet-bandwidth limited.


---------------
Core2 E6750 @3.68 Ghz
(on Asus P5K)
Wintec DDR2-800 2 GB
Geforce 8800 GTX and Radeon 2900 XT
Samsung 245BW 24" LCD
Just my two frames' worth.
Profile: Graphic Gorilla
More Information

The other thing to remember is that while it may not have appeared to improve much, you may now be actually running much better shaders, instead of the partial-precision or DX8 &lower stuff the FX usually reverts to.

So if it's running all the siny DX9/SM3.0 heavy geomtery or texture load stuff it may be doing 5 times more work, but at the same performance level as before.

I agree with the others, make sure you clean out the old drivers, and then re-install the new ones, but also look at the settings and see if suddenyl it didn't auto detect or set new checkboxes or move sliders to the right.

Personally I lways thought games like WOW were sysem bound, but I don't play them enough to know.

CS:S should be fine with that CPU despite being a Celeron. But a big map or many players may be enough to limit any benefits you notice in your upgrade.


---------------
You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Xazax310 wrote :

Your CPU is serverly limiting performance. I suggest you turn up the graphics a bit, as the Celeron only has a 512k L2 Cache it makes it extremely weak for games and applications. Hence why your not noticing a difference in performance.



If it is a cedar mill celeron. At that clock speed it could be a Prescott celeron too, with only 256KiB L2.

Profile: stranger
More Information

It seems strange to me cause when i went from FX5600xt(64 bit) to 7600 GS on Athlon XP 3200+ it was almost 300% perfomance increase in WoW.My cpu is limiting my 7600gs only in big cities like orgrimmar or stormwind.So try installing new vide drivers and check temps of cpu maybe it is throttling.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Umm... It's most likely not a driver issue, I used that driver cleaner thing and it didn't change a thing. The BIOS settings are correct too.

The GPU is running at 60 C idle and goes up around 70C on load. The CPU is at 40 idle and about 70 on load as well.
And yes, it's a prescott celeron.

Profile: old hand
More Information

GPU sounds like its running warmer than it should but not to a point that would cause a slowdown. The 7x00 series should run into the 80C+ range without throttling if past experience serves me right. One thing you might look into is a clean install... a lot of work though. The "regardless of video settings" would definitely suggest CPU limiting but there could easily be other factors.

-mcg

Profile: stranger
More Information

Well i played f.e.a.r on 7600gs at 105 Degrees celsius and had no artifacts which amazed me ) but 70c for cpu is hot, run "Throttle watch" under heavy load to check if it is throttling it may slow down your perfomance in games.


Message edited by RuFuS on 02-14-2008 at 06:43:14 PM

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Recently changed from a FX5200 to a 7600 GS AGP.

Go to:
 

Google Ads