Intel will be offering a slightly upgraded version of its 945GC integrated graphics chipset for Core 2 Duo, Pentium D and Pentium 4 HT processors beginning in early April of this year. Read more
Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS) today announced that its DDR2 modules have passed compatibility tests conducted by Advanced Validation Labs (AVL), with the products being DDR2-533 and DDR2-667 SO-DIMMs for notebooks and DDR2-667 un-buffered DIMMs for desktop PCs. Read more
Currently, DDR2 chips in the spot market account for less than 5% of total DDR2 chip supply, according to a DRAMeXchange survey of major module houses and channel suppliers. Read more
Samsung Semiconductor plans to expand its production of DDR2 memory this year to the point where DDR2 becomes its largest product category, setting the stage for decreases in price, DDR2 memory is the planned successor to DDR SDRAM, the standard currently used in most of the world's PCs. Read more
We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more
This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more
We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more
We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more
| Bottom | |
|---|---|
| Author |
Thread : Core 2 Duo E8200 and DDR2 800MHz problems!
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Hay
|
|
Related Product
|
|
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
PC 6400 (DDR2 800)... same thing just two different ways to reference it... works at 400 MHz. That is the stock speed. For a 1:1 ratio for a system bus (front side bus/4) of 333, your ram would operate at 333 MHz or DDR 667 speed. Many mother boards have options to adjust the ratio of the ram (you can make it go faster then 1:1). You could, on your mobo... in the bios, have an option to adjust the ratio. If you adjust the system bus first, then you are OCing your CPU as well as the northbridge and memory. This might not be a bad thing at all. Just realize what you are doing. |
|
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Hide
Display/Hide instant messengers
My ratio is 1:1 1333FSB and 667DDR2...But I had a Pentium 531 before this cpu and I was doing almost everything with it 12:8, 6:4......Now with the E8200 i can overclck just 10-20% and my 800MHz works only on 667MHz...But who cares its better maybe for 500% then with the 531 cpu |
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
Do you have specific settins in your Mother board to set the ram ratio? I am not familiar with that exact mother board, but it seems reasonable that a 975 chipset would have that option. I would leave the system bus alone and look for a memory option. Wish you had an Asus board, because I know the bios settings for those well.
Message edited by hairycat101 on 02-27-2008 at 04:05:46 PM |
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
IMO i think what ya need to do is DO NOT lock the rated speed of the mem in bios (speed ddr2800) set it to "auto" only! now manualy raise the cpu's fsb from 333 to 400 bringing the fsb from 1333 to 1600 that matches ddr2 800 (dual channel 800 witch is actually 1600) bringing you to 1:1 ratio.
Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by doubletake33 on 02-27-2008 at 03:41:33 PM |
|
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information
|
However, I'm not surprised he is hitting a FSB wall.
--------------- If its good in theory but not in practice, its not good theory. |
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
|
|
Profile: enthusiast
More Information
|
with ya all the way hairycat101! just trying to see if the bios will allow the OP to do it in order to get the mem speed he paid for. Message edited by doubletake33 on 02-27-2008 at 03:52:42 PM |
|
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information
|
It seems the bios was doing everything correctly. You say it sets your memory to 667. Whelp.. lets do the math: 666/2=333 Now your E8200 has a rated FSB of 1333. Now take 333 x 4 = 1332 or basically 1333. Since you bumped it to 400, your trying to really push that FSB rated frequencey to 1600 rather then 1333. Like the other guys said, it has to do with the ratio. If you can run the divider right, you can run the memory at 800mhz, but the ratio would no longer be at 1:1 since you are running the memory faster then the CPU's FSB. Edit: Err.. hmmm. So the multiplier is 8 for the E8200. Gawd.. to run the memory at advertised speed, that means the OC would be 8x400=3.2ghz... and it can't do that? I guess the chipset is what's holding it back? Message edited by Grimmy on 02-27-2008 at 03:56:09 PM |
|
Profile: old hand
More Information
|
Go ahead and run the ram faster then the system bus. 1:1 isn't magical. I seem to get better performance the faster I can run the ram. |
|
Profile: stranger
More Information
|
Hide
Display/Hide instant messengers
|
