Ad
News

Intel upgrades entry-level Core 2 Duo chipset

Published on March 02, 2007

Intel will be offering a slightly upgraded version of its 945GC integrated graphics chipset for Core 2 Duo, Pentium D and Pentium 4 HT processors beginning in early April of this year. Read more

SiS DDR2 DRAM modules gain AVL validation

Published on April 13, 2006

Silicon Integrated Systems (SiS) today announced that its DDR2 modules have passed compatibility tests conducted by Advanced Validation Labs (AVL), with the products being DDR2-533 and DDR2-667 SO-DIMMs for notebooks and DDR2-667 un-buffered DIMMs for desktop PCs. Read more

DDR2 price premium narrows to 5-10 percent in contract market

Published on April 20, 2005

Currently, DDR2 chips in the spot market account for less than 5% of total DDR2 chip supply, according to a DRAMeXchange survey of major module houses and channel suppliers. Read more

Samsung leading DDR2 memory push in 2005

Published on January 27, 2005

Samsung Semiconductor plans to expand its production of DDR2 memory this year to the point where DDR2 becomes its largest product category, setting the stage for decreases in price, DDR2 memory is the planned successor to DDR SDRAM, the standard currently used in most of the world's PCs. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?

Published on October 24, 2008

We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more

Benchmarking With Intel's NAS Toolkit

Published on October 23, 2008

We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Core 2 Duo E8200 and DDR2 800MHz problems!
 

Core 2 Duo E8200 and DDR2 800MHz problems!




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Core 2 Duo E8200 and DDR2 800MHz problems!
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hay

I bought a Core 2 Duo E8200 which is running on my Abit Aw9d MAX 975X board, bios 1.6. The problem is that I can't put my Kingmax DDR2 800MHz memory to work on 800MHz, its working only on 667 MHz. If I put it manully on 800MHz I have to put the FSB 1600MHz and it will not boot. I saw on the internet that the new cores can be clocked almost with 500MHz - 2000 MHz FSB and i Cant reach 1400MHz. Where is the problem? Board? memory? CPU?

Tnx!

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

Wolfdale wrote :

Hay

I bought a Core 2 Duo E8200 which is running on my Abit Aw9d MAX 975X board, bios 1.6. The problem is that I can't put my Kingmax DDR2 800MHz memory to work on 800MHz, its working only on 667 MHz. If I put it manully on 800MHz I have to put the FSB 1600MHz and it will not boot. I saw on the internet that the new cores can be clocked almost with 500MHz - 2000 MHz FSB and i Cant reach 1400MHz. Where is the problem? Board? memory? CPU?

Tnx!



Need to change it to 1:1 ration 533 processor 1066 memory, I have the same board but its running my E6600 which is in a box in my living room :/ can't boot it to confirm.

Word, Playa.

Profile: old hand
More Information

PC 6400 (DDR2 800)... same thing just two different ways to reference it... works at 400 MHz. That is the stock speed. For a 1:1 ratio for a system bus (front side bus/4) of 333, your ram would operate at 333 MHz or DDR 667 speed. Many mother boards have options to adjust the ratio of the ram (you can make it go faster then 1:1). You could, on your mobo... in the bios, have an option to adjust the ratio. If you adjust the system bus first, then you are OCing your CPU as well as the northbridge and memory. This might not be a bad thing at all. Just realize what you are doing.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

So in short to what hairycat101 said, your system is running at 1333 which will be faster than 800. It shows the memory at 667 but will really be running at 1333. Thats what I have my Q6600 set at so it has a 1:1 FSB ration with the CPU.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
http://www.alabasterslim.com/0/jimmysmitty.png
Profile: old hand
More Information

jimmysmitty wrote :

So in short to what hairycat101 said, your system is running at 1333 which will be faster than 800. It shows the memory at 667 but will really be running at 1333. Thats what I have my Q6600 set at so it has a 1:1 FSB ration with the CPU.


Um... not exactly. what I was trying to say is that the front side bus is related to memory speed but it is not always exact. If your q6600 is at 1:1 then you are running your ram at DDR2 533. You can increase the ratio. It might, in the bios be expressed as a ratio or as a DDR2 number or as a PC numpber... like PC 6400. For the Q6600 example the front side bus is 1066. The stock multiplier is X9. 1066/4 = ~ 266. 266 is the system bus. 266 X 9 = 2,394 or ~ 2.4. DDR2 runs at half of the expressed speed. DDR2 800 runs at 400 MHz. I have a Q6600 and my ratio is 2:3. My ram is running at ~ 400 MHz. Here the 266 X 1.5 = 399 or ~ 400. 2:3 can be expressed as 3/2 or 1.5.

http://www.cpuid.com/cpuz.php

Profile: stranger
More Information

My ratio is 1:1 1333FSB and 667DDR2...But I had a Pentium 531 before this cpu and I was doing almost everything with it 12:8, 6:4......Now with the E8200 i can overclck just 10-20% and my 800MHz works only on 667MHz...But who cares its better maybe for 500% then with the 531 cpu :D. Thanks!

Profile: old hand
More Information

Do you have specific settins in your Mother board to set the ram ratio? I am not familiar with that exact mother board, but it seems reasonable that a 975 chipset would have that option. I would leave the system bus alone and look for a memory option. Wish you had an Asus board, because I know the bios settings for those well.


I am not trying to be pejoritive about the manufacturer of his mother board. I am just very familiar with Asus.


Message edited by hairycat101 on 02-27-2008 at 04:05:46 PM
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

IMO i think what ya need to do is DO NOT lock the rated speed of the mem in bios (speed ddr2800) set it to "auto" only! now manualy raise the cpu's fsb from 333 to 400 bringing the fsb from 1333 to 1600 that matches ddr2 800 (dual channel 800 witch is actually 1600) bringing you to 1:1 ratio.

check and see if your mobo's bios will allow you to do this. i have the asus P5K-E mobo and it allows me to do it.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by doubletake33 on 02-27-2008 at 03:41:33 PM
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

However, I'm not surprised he is hitting a FSB wall.
The 975 Chipset is getting old, it's even older than the 965.

That board was designed for a FSB of 1066 and it can clearly easily do 1333 from what you are showing. But many of the older boards could not get huge FSB speeds.

For those, you really want to be looking at a P35, X38, or a board like that.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
Profile: old hand
More Information

doubletake33 wrote :

IMO i think what ya need to do is DO NOT lock the rated speed of the mem in bio (speed ddr2800) set it to "auto" only! now manualy raise the cpu's fsb from 333 to 400 bringing the fsb from 1333 to 1600 that matches ddr2 800 (dual channel 800 witch is actually 1600) bringing you to 1:1 ratio.

check and see if your mobo will allow you to do this. i have the asus P5K-E mobo and it allows me to do it.



If he is at 1:1 ratio, then it doesn't matter what the FSB is. It will always be 1:1. I know what you meant. This is a way to bring it to its rated speed.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

with ya all the way hairycat101! just trying to see if the bios will allow the OP to do it in order to get the mem speed he paid for.


Message edited by doubletake33 on 02-27-2008 at 03:52:42 PM
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Wolfdale wrote :

Hay

 

I bought a Core 2 Duo E8200 which is running on my Abit Aw9d MAX 975X board, bios 1.6. The problem is that I can't put my Kingmax DDR2 800MHz memory to work on 800MHz, its working only on 667 MHz. If I put it manully on 800MHz I have to put the FSB 1600MHz and it will not boot. I saw on the internet that the new cores can be clocked almost with 500MHz - 2000 MHz FSB and i Cant reach 1400MHz. Where is the problem? Board? memory? CPU?

 

Tnx!

 

It seems the bios was doing everything correctly. You say it sets your memory to 667. Whelp.. lets do the math:

 

666/2=333

 

Now your E8200 has a rated FSB of 1333. Now take 333 x 4 = 1332 or basically 1333.

 

Since you bumped it to 400, your trying to really push that FSB rated frequencey to 1600 rather then 1333. Like the other guys said, it has to do with the ratio. If you can run the divider right, you can run the memory at 800mhz, but the ratio would no longer be at 1:1 since you are running the memory faster then the CPU's FSB.

 

Edit:

 

Err.. hmmm. So the multiplier is 8 for the E8200. Gawd.. to run the memory at advertised speed, that means the OC would be 8x400=3.2ghz... and it can't do that? I guess the chipset is what's holding it back? :sweat: . o O (Doh.. 975 chipset, eh?)


Message edited by Grimmy on 02-27-2008 at 03:56:09 PM
Profile: old hand
More Information

Go ahead and run the ram faster then the system bus. 1:1 isn't magical. I seem to get better performance the faster I can run the ram. :)

Profile: stranger
More Information