Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 - Reached 3 ghz and need input on voltage levels
 

Q6600 - Reached 3 ghz and need input on voltage levels




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 - Reached 3 ghz and need input on voltage levels
 
Profile: stranger
More Information

Hi there,

 

Last night I managed to (finally) OC my Q6600 to 3ghz (9 x 333 [4:5 ratio]).
I also managed to run Prime95 for a little over an hour with no errors.
Woohoo.

 

Now before I ran P95 for that hour my NB overheated and my PC shut itself down.
So I went into the BIOS and lowered the NB Voltage by 3-5 increments (from 1.18 down to 1.144)
and I didn't get any shutdowns or anything when running P95.

  

I want to know if these voltage levels seem o.k to you guys:

 

CPU: 1.32
DRAM: 2.110 (2x 2gb Corsair Dominator 4-4-4-12)
NB: 1.151
SB 1.1: 1.111
SB 1.5: 1.500
FSB Term.: 1.396
DRAM VTT: 1.052
CPU PLL: 1.680

 


I'm a little edgy over these readings due to the fact that my original CPU PLL was 1.535 and my FSB Termination was 1.204. If I try lowering these 2 values will it have a large impact on my system stability?

 

Also what's the general rule for modifying RAM performance? Is more voltage required for more MHz or is less voltage required for tighter timings?

 


Thanks for any help in advance.

 


EDIT:

 

I forgot to mention that I am using a P45 Maximus II Formula mobo.

 


EDIT 2:

 

I manged to get my CPU to 3.2ghz (8 x 400) to get a 1:1 ratio, however, it is pretty unstable now.
To get my comp to run P95 for 1.5 hours I had to greatly increase some voltages and I am now extremely edgy over them.

 

Before increasing these voltage levels I was only able to run P95 for around 5 - 10 mins.
During these tests I got many blue screens.

 

Despite the fact that I think my voltage levels are massive, my CPU is actually not getting over 60c when running a torture test, which is good.

 

Can anyone give me some info here because I've heard of other people running their Q6600s stable on 1.3v or less and mine is not even though it's at over 1.4...

 



Message edited by Tinki3 on 08-23-2008 at 09:38:15 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: stranger
More Information

Every chip is different so don't worry about what other people can do. Anything under 1.55V and you should be fine. 1.5V or less is the ideal mark though.

My name is... V3NOM... and i like cheese.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

maybe drop the multiplier to 7.5 and 400FSB so that's 3.0GHz?

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

select the lowest possible voltage for all component(apart from vcore which you need to set to VID value) then start your OC from there and increase each of them one by one little by little until you are stable then further increase you FSB and up the voltage accordingly when you see instability.

My name is... V3NOM... and i like cheese.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

what do you need to adjust the voltage on first when overclocking? cpu vcore? fsb voltage? NB voltage? :??:

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

start with Vcore then FSB then NB and lastly MCH

My name is... V3NOM... and i like cheese.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

what about if your cpu speed isnt changing? eg 6 multiplier 400fsb with a Q6600 is still at stock SPEED just different multiplier and fsb... does that mean vcore stays the same but you up the fsb cos its gone from 266 to 400? and what exactly is the MCH...

You tell me what I do.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

if the cpu speed stayed the same then you just need to up the dsb/nb/mch because parts other then the CPU is being overclocked.

thats the theory BUT there might need a slight bump in vcore to maintain stability.

MCH stands for Memory Controller Hub which is where the Memory and CPU connected in the NB.


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Overclocking » CPUs » Q6600 - Reached 3 ghz and need input on voltage levels

Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Computex: Coolermaster Launches 80plus Silver PSU

Published on June 01, 2008

Power supplies still have opportunities for improving power efficiency. Coolermaster is the first PSU manufacturer to release a unit that complies to 80plus silver, reaching between 85 and 88% efficiency. Read more

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

DisplayBank: Global PDP shipments reached 1.3 million panels in 1Q05

Published on April 18, 2005

Global PDP (plasma display panel) shipments reached 1.29 million units in the first quarter of 2005, growing 72.8% on year and 11.9% on quarter, according to South Korea-based DisplayBank. Read more

Philips To Transfer PC Monitor Brand To TPV

Published on July 09, 2008

Royal Philips Electronics today announced that it has reached an agreement with TPV Technology on key terms and conditions of a brand licensing agreement under which Philips will transfer its PC monitors business, IT Displays, to TPV. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Tom's SBM: The $1,500 Mainstream PC

Published on October 29, 2008

We're following up yesterday's $4,500 behemoth with a more affordable $1,500 mid-range build. Let's see what sort of performance (and overclocking headroom) you can get when you spend one third of the money. Read more

System Builder Marathon: The $4,500 Super PC

Published on October 28, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon spreads the system prices out even further to $4,500, $1,500, and $500. Is today’s $4,500 system really worth three times as much as an upper-mainstream performance machine? Read more

Can Your Old Athlon 64 Still Game?

Published on October 24, 2008

We'd all love to upgrade every time a new piece of gaming hardware drops, but that's an expensive proposition. You think your Athlon 64 system is fairly quick--any chance a simple graphics upgrade can bring it up speed? We're aiming to find out. Read more

Benchmarking With Intel's NAS Toolkit

Published on October 23, 2008

We've been publishing our networked storage stories using Intel's NAS Performance tool kit as our primary benchmark. But before we went any further, we thought we'd introduce the software package and its individual components. Read more