Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?

If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?

Forum CPU & Components : CPUs - If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

If the same lie about the E8400's is repeated enough times, does it become fact in some people's minds?

Even the CPU guide in this section quotes "Rumors from the interwebs", or something just as credible, and trys to move people away from the Wolfdales. However, a quick search on newegg shows 250+ reviews, and I can't find a mention of this. (Before everyone flames the newegg reviewers, I wonder how many people here have purchased something from them and reviewed it.) It is by no means a scientific sample, but it speaks wonders.

I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that. It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.

The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB. They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try. People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe. I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way. I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!) so he was RMAing it. Ludicrous.

If people are having legitimate problems with temp sensors, that is something we need to know. I've seen more posts regurgitating "a friend of a friend" stories on this. Myself and 3 other people I know personally own this chip and have OC, and no problems yet. Core temp reads and reports the temps fine.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by ocguy31 on 02-28-2008 at 09:05:40 AM
------------------------------ Intel E8400 @ 3.8ghz Under Arctic Pro 7
ASUS P5KC
2GB DDR2 800 Patriot
EVGA 8800GTS
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Quote :

I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that. It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.


Looks like you already know the answer. Someone posts about one, you get some fanboy from the other side responding in kind.
What is really sad is that people coming here for advice, get fed this crap.

Reply to endyen

Chalk one up for another satisfied 4GHz E8400 owner :D

------------------------------ Intel C2D E8400 OC @ 3.6GHz.--TRUE 120 W/ Scythe S-Flex 28.0dB.--EVGA 8800GTS 512MB.--ASUS Maximus Formula X38 (0907).--Crucial Ballistix 2x1GB DDR2 4-4-4-12 @ 800Mhz.--WD 150gb Raptor.--Corsair 620HX Modular PSU.--Antec P182 Case.-- Vista 32bit.
Reply to Beurling

True, just like the B3 Errata.
Never going to happen in everyday use and look at all of the slagging off on here (and how many owners are there? :lol: )

------------------------------ 6000+ Stock, GA M57SLi-S4, XFX 8800GTX's SLi Stock, 4Gb Corsair PC6400 DHX, CoolerMaster 850W, 36Gb Raptor boot drive, 2x150Gb Raptor's in RAID 0 - XFX RAID controller & 300Gb Seagate. PowerBook G4 12" 1.5GHz, Go5200 64mb, 768mb RAM, 80Gb HD, SuperDrive.
Reply to LukeBird

If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?

sadly the answer is yes, in the minds of many people this will make it "true" also if they want to believe it they will treat it as fact.

look at religeon, racism, fashism, the killing of "witches" hundreds of years ago, ghosts... the list goes on

i know these are on a much higher level than the E8400 rumor lol but i think they work on the same principle of people believing rumors, myths and lies because they want to or because every one around them tells them its fact.. when it clearly is not

Reply to psymanproductions

ocguy31 wrote :

The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB. They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try. People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe. I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way. I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!) so he was RMAing it. Ludicrous.




Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. ;) :) :bounce:

------------------------------ Digital might vs mainstream apogee retarded by freedom infused with insanity. You are a sleep walker; I am your reaper, pass-through the nightmare delivering AI reason. Accept your fate in this vortex paradigm; this machine controls you, it is your maker.
Reply to JonnyRock

JonnyRock wrote :

Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. ;) :) :bounce:



nice words, very true

Reply to psymanproductions

Heh... it all boils down to:

1.) Having the correct most updated bios.
2.) Knowing a work around (Disabling DTS Feature on some MB).
3.) Understanding the 3 sensors (Tcase,Tjuction)
4.) Having some accuracy on ambient temps.
5.) Having good airflow.
6.) And knowing how to correctly install the HSF on a 775 socket MB.

Also knowing the right kind of chipsets on MB that can handle OC better. I find it kind of crazy to OC to 4ghz myself, but still impressive without water cooling. I find 3-3.6ghz fast enough.

But there are unhappy people out there, wanting to put their mark somewhere to stress out their frustrations. I find it kinda funny how some people call the sensor problem that serious when they don't understand how the problem occurs. As well with the Phenom bug, which people don't seem to understand it, and want to totally avoid it. But then, to get random BSOD is just frustrating all in its own, when your trying to get more speed out of it.

One of these days, we'll look back at this and laugh our butts off when the technology advances to a higher level. :lol:. o O (remember the days when the...)

Reply to Grimmy

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad. I think it is related to depression. A depressed person wants everyone else to be a fraked up too... That way his life doesn't seem to bad...

Now that fanboys do not have something factual to base their arguments on, they are simply flaming to get attention..

If there was a problem with the new Intel processors, why would only the wolfdales suffer from it? The already released QX9650 is immune? It's the same core people.

Reply to BSMonitor

Misery... loves company. `Metallica

Reply to Grimmy

The funny thing is this is a free voice for morons.As humans we tend to gravitate to negatives,and the few thats rashanal are lost in the see of fanboy-ism on any side.We all have a little Thunderman in us ,some show it more than others

Reply to ro3dog

Grimmy wrote :

2.) Knowing a work around (Disabling DTS Feature on some MB).


What's this DTS? Is that the DTS for the onboard sound or what? Sorry, having a brain fart right now.

Reply to gwolfman

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

 

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.

 

Spoken like a true Intel fanboy. You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective. If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.

 


hahahaha pwned !!

 

Soooo true.

------------------------------ Q6600 G0 @3.6 1.34v | GTX280 1GB | 26" Samsung T260| 19" 1907FP | Asus Maximus Formula X38 (Rampage Mod) | Kandalf VD4000 LCS | Ultra X2 750W | Supreme FXII 7.1 | Audio FX Pro 5.1 Headset | 4x1024 Ballistix Tracer 5-5-5-14 1066mhz | LG GGW-H20L
Reply to thecompukid

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.



Spoken like a true Intel fanboy. You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective. If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.





You make zero sense and compare apples to oranges.

The problem with the Phenom is its bugs and its LOW PERFORMANCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE OVER YEAR OLD Q6600.

And I'm sorry, saying some of the E8400s don't OC as well as others does not make it defective. Does it run great at standard settings? Yes? Not deffective. Seeing people OC the thing to 4+ Ghz is eye opening. People having problems with their E8400 OCing to 4Ghz? Sorry about your luck, but the chip still works great at 3Ghz as it was marketed to when you purchased it.

But please continue to compare the very impressive dual core Wolfdale to the under performing, more expensive quad core Phenom.

And this is coming from a guy that's really rooting for AMD.

------------------------------ Antec Nine Hundred, Gigabyte P35-DS3R, Intel Q6600 @ 3.2 Ghz, Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme, eVGA 8800GT 512MB, G-Skill 4GB (2x2GB) DDR2-800 4-4-4-10, Seasonic S12 ATX 650W, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB SATA, 26" LCD Monitor (1900x1200), Windows XP Pr
Reply to deuce271

Quote :

If the same lie about the E8400's is repeated enough times, does it become fact in some people's minds?

Even the CPU guide in this section quotes "Rumors from the interwebs", or something just as credible, and trys to move people away from the Wolfdales. However, a quick search on newegg shows 250+ reviews, and I can't find a mention of this. (Before everyone flames the newegg reviewers, I wonder how many people here have purchased something from them and reviewed it.) It is by no means a scientific sample, but it speaks wonders.

I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that. It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.

The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB. They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try. People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe. I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way. I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!) so he was RMAing it. Ludicrous.

If people are having legitimate problems with temp sensors, that is something we need to know. I've seen more posts regurgitating "a friend of a friend" stories on this. Myself and 3 other people I know personally own this chip and have OC, and no problems yet. Core temp reads and reports the temps fine.




:sleep:

------------------------------ E7200 @ 2.53Ghz, 2 gigs Mushkin ddr2 800, Gigabyte EP45-UD3R, Western Digital 640 gig, Gigabyte HD 4850 512MB, Asus DVD burner, HP w2007 monitor...
http://i299.photobucket.com/albums/mm282/alphahuman98/masterchiefdancing_4-1.gif

 

Reply to physx7

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.



Spoken like a true Intel fanboy. You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective. If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.



Are you trying to provide an example to the quoted statement?

------------------------------ Intel will not take the top spot, or probably the top 3 spot back for the forseeable future. Not even with 32nm and more cores will intel be able to beat Jaguar. - JennyH the AMDiot, Nov 2009
Reply to yomamafor1

gwolfman wrote :

What's this DTS? Is that the DTS for the onboard sound or what? Sorry, having a brain fart right now.


Digital Thermal Sensor. I may have got it mixed up in my mind with (off the CPU OC'ing Section):

 
Quote :

PECI %u2013 This stands for Platform Environment Control Interface - disable or enable. This affects how your DTS (Digital Thermal Sensors) report the core temps of your CPU. I have mine enabled and have read several posts now that suggest having it enabled does indeed give more accurate core temps. I can%u2019t say if you want it on or off in your system.

 

This was off another thread:

 
yomamafor1 wrote :

This is from Intel's own documentary:
http://download.intel.com/design/p [...] 873303.pdf

 
Quote :


AW30. Programming the Digital Thermal Sensor (DTS) Threshold May Cause
Unexpected Thermal Interrupts
Problem: Software can enable DTS thermal interrupts by programming the thermal
threshold and setting the respective thermal interrupt enable bit. When
programming DTS value, the previous DTS threshold may be crossed. This
will generate an unexpected thermal interrupt.
Implication: Software may observe an unexpected thermal interrupt occur after
reprogramming the thermal threshold.
Workaround: In the ACPI/OS implement a workaround by temporarily disabling the DTS
threshold interrupt before updating the DTS threshold value.
Status: For the steppings affected, see the Summary Tables of Changes.

 

Courtesy of Spud, who posted this earlier.

 

So in other words, Intel does inform the public about such errata, but most Average Joe users just don't care enough to look through these white papers.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by Grimmy on 02-28-2008 at 08:51:36 PM
Reply to Grimmy

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad.

 

Spoken like a true Intel fanboy. You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006?
Its true theres a problem but its no big deal> Just like Phenom, 99% of users will never have a problem, but Intel fanboys make the problem seem like its huge and the product is defective. If Phenom is defective, then the E8400 is defective, end of discussion.

 

End of discussion? Guess she didn't get her crystal ball back yet.

 

Well... Phenom has a B3 Stepping that is to correct that problem. I mean if it wasn't really that serious, then why bother to even have a B3 stepping or articles explain that?

 

Now if there an actual serious problem with the E8400, shouldn't we be seeing a new stepping soon that says the DTS is now fixed? So far I haven't seen anything on that. But then I'm not looking forward in getting another dual core. :whistle:


Message edited by Grimmy on 02-28-2008 at 09:02:30 PM
Reply to Grimmy

Grimmy wrote :

Digital Thermal Sensor. I may have got it mixed up in my mind with (off the CPU OC'ing Section):

 
Quote :

PECI %u2013 This stands for Platform Environment Control Interface - disable or enable. This affects how your DTS (Digital Thermal Sensors) report the core temps of your CPU. I have mine enabled and have read several posts now that suggest having it enabled does indeed give more accurate core temps. I can%u2019t say if you want it on or off in your system.

 

This was off another thread:


Thanks, i *now remember reading about it too


Message edited by gwolfman on 02-29-2008 at 04:17:17 PM
Reply to gwolfman

MrsBytch wrote :

Quote :

Well... Phenom has a B3 Stepping that is to correct that problem. I mean if it wasn't really that serious, then why bother to even have a B3 stepping or articles explain that?



Well if you read about it you would know that B3 didnt fix it. Secondly, the problem is only found in virtualization, 99.9% of users are never, ever going to see a problem with phenom and its the fix that causes performance loss, not the tld bug itself.
Its only a big deal, because Intel fanboys made it a big deal and its justly right for the AMD guys to call the E8400 defective because it has a little problem. Personally I could care less, I have much bigger life issues to worry about. Apparently to pre-pubescent school children, it is a life changing issue they feel they need to make posts to address.



:heink: . o O (?)

AMD Phenom B3 stepping confirmed to fix TLB erratum - Friday, 11 January 2008

Quote :

Since not long after the release of AMD's Phenom series of CPUs, we've been informed that the infamous TLB erratum which plagues these parts, impacting their performance, will be fixed in a forthcoming 'B3' stepping. However, this assertion has been thrown into doubt in recent days due to an article on French web site EreNumeRique, which was later picked up by The Inquirer, suggesting that the erratum had not been fixed in the 'B3' stepping, creating the need for AMD to go back to the drawing board yet again for another spin of the silicon.

After reading this potentially worrying story, we contacted AMD to get their take on the matter straight from the horse's mouth. Their response couldn't have been much clearer, as they stated that the story surrounding 'B3' silicon not fixing the TLB issue is "simply not true", and that "B3 silicon does not have the TLB erratum. It is fixed.".



Phenom B3 is right around the corner... - Date: February 9th, 2008

Quote :

The bouncing ball release schedule for the long awaited Phenom B3 revision that fixes the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) errata has taken a favorable bounce according to our sources. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) plans on releasing three versions into the retail market in the early April time frame. Fortunately for consumers, it appears that AMD will change the product designations in order to differentiate the B3 series from the current B2 release.



AMD Plans to Introduce New AMD Phenom Chips in April - 02/08/2008

Quote :

AMD Phenom processor models 9550 (2.20GHz), 9650 (2.30GHz) and 9750 (2.40GHz) will be released commercially about eight weeks from now, sometime in April, a source familiar with the world’s second largest x86 chipmaker’s plans said. The new chips will be based on the B3 revision of the processor and will not have any issues with Translation Lookaside Buffer. The destiny of the high-speed AMD Phenom 9950 is unclear at the moment.

After a Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB)-related erratum was discovered in AMD Phenom microprocessors and AMD had to impose a fix that reduced performance of the CPUs, Advanced Micro Devices announced a new B3 stepping of the chip with bug corrected without performance degradation. Originally the higher-performance AMD Phenom 9700 and 9900 at 2.40GHz and 2.60GHz, respectively, were scheduled to arrive in Q1, but after a series of delays many suspected that the products slipped into late Q2 or even Q3.



What have you been reading?


Message edited by Grimmy on 02-29-2008 at 04:58:53 PM
Reply to Grimmy

Phenom's suck
e8400's suck

I'm sticking to my C3-650

<Edit>woops forgot to add j/k</Edit>


Message edited by netpcdoc on 02-29-2008 at 05:49:29 PM
------------------------------ Computer Technician/Network Administrator
http://www.netpcdoc.com
Reply to netpcdoc

This thread is degenerating fast. I think both situations are over blown unless you run a server. Anyways, Ive read that Intel plans on a more aggressive bin culling that may stop the "it wont oc to xxxx" crap. Lets hope so, cause I like what Intels been doing. So, unless youre running a server and got burnt by the TLD bug, or bought a Wolfy that doesnt oc like you thought it would, just cool it, both are known to happen and thats just the way it is

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

Typical MrsBytch right here. Like normal every post from MrsBytch is either wrong or just utter BS

Reply to someguy7

JonnyRock wrote :

Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. ;) :) :bounce:



Whats wrong with porn?

------------------------------ And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
Reply to spaztic7

http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e381/kamrencita/CM519Porn-Posters.jpg

------------------------------ Digital might vs mainstream apogee retarded by freedom infused with insanity. You are a sleep walker; I am your reaper, pass-through the nightmare delivering AI reason. Accept your fate in this vortex paradigm; this machine controls you, it is your maker.
Reply to JonnyRock

Quoting Newegg Reviews = Fail

------------------------------ jennyh wrote: AMD break-even Q4 2009. *Gauranteed*

RabidFanboysSpreadingFalse.Info
Reply to TechnologyCoordinator

I think anyone who OC's anything on their PC should be charged with theft because they are stealing from the poor old chipmakers.

------------------------------ The Dead are Dead.
The Living are Dying.

And yes, that is me in the pic.
Reply to NewbieTechGodII

I have a E8400...I use an aftermarket HSF,problem solved...and 4.2ghz to boot!!!

------------------------------ Q9550,ASUS P5N-T Deluxe 780i mobo,ANTEC 900 case,PC Power&Cooling Turbo Cool 1200 watt,4 Gigs OCZ 1066mhz,Zerotherm Nirvana Cooler,X-Fi Platinum sound card,BFG GTX 285 OC SLi,Razer Tarantula Keyboard,Razer Lachesis mouse,Razer Barracuda Headphones.Gateway
Reply to kellytm3

NewbieTechGodII wrote :

I think anyone who OC's anything on their PC should be charged with theft because they are stealing from the poor old chipmakers.



:heink: . o O (what?)

You spend your hard earn money on something that GIVES you (I'm talking bios settings) features to OC the CPU or Memory (products for enthusiasts) or even buy video cards that are OC'd and maybe try to get a lil more out of it, and you call it stealling?

That's like saying... I think people that alter the cars to use bio diesel should be charged with theft because they are stealing from old oil companies.

The only thing those two things do share, is making a better product work better. :kaola:

Reply to Grimmy

JonnyRock wrote :

Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. ;) :) :bounce:


that is as true as mathmatics

------------------------------ Q6600 (overclocked to 3.2ghz) GAp35-DS-3L mobo, 8BG G-SKILL ddr2-1066, gigabyte gts 250(1GB), 2x dvd burner,320gb hard drive,640gb hard drive, black antec p182 case with corsair 750 watt psu.
Reply to reconviperone1

JonnyRock wrote :

Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. ;) :) :bounce:




Going by your definition I would have called that "Citizen's Band Radio" that disappeared; it fits all the descriptions you ascribe to the Internet.... it disappeared around 1985... was replaced by 24 hour TV, Mass Media, and "Information Overload"... and cell phones.

Back then people would talk trash... and everyone would get the message to meet at 7-11 for coffee.

Now they talk trash... and everyone gets intant messaged to meet at Starbucks.

(And the level of intelligence on both the Internet now and the CB radio back then is surprisingly similar.)


Message edited by keithlm on 03-01-2008 at 07:15:53 PM
Reply to keithlm
Tom's Hardware > Forum > CPU & Components > CPUs > If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?
Go to:

There are 720 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them