If the same lie about the E8400's is repeated enough times, does it become fact in some people's minds?
Even the CPU guide in this section quotes "Rumors from the interwebs", or something just as credible, and trys to move people away from the Wolfdales. However, a quick search on newegg shows 250+ reviews, and I can't find a mention of this. (Before everyone flames the newegg reviewers, I wonder how many people here have purchased something from them and reviewed it.) It is by no means a scientific sample, but it speaks wonders.
I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that. It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems.
The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB. They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try. People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe. I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way. I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!) so he was RMAing it. Ludicrous.
If people are having legitimate problems with temp sensors, that is something we need to know. I've seen more posts regurgitating "a friend of a friend" stories on this. Myself and 3 other people I know personally own this chip and have OC, and no problems yet. Core temp reads and reports the temps fine.
| Quote : I am only mentioning this, because I just read a post in another thread that said "Oh yea, the E8400s ALL have problems!", or some horse **** like that. It is as dumb as saying all the Phenoms have problems. |
Looks like you already know the answer. Someone posts about one, you get some fanboy from the other side responding in kind.
What is really sad is that people coming here for advice, get fed this crap.
Chalk one up for another satisfied 4GHz E8400 owner
True, just like the B3 Errata.
Never going to happen in everyday use and look at all of the slagging off on here (and how many owners are there?
)
If the same lie is said enough times, does it make it true?
sadly the answer is yes, in the minds of many people this will make it "true" also if they want to believe it they will treat it as fact.
look at religeon, racism, fashism, the killing of "witches" hundreds of years ago, ghosts... the list goes on
i know these are on a much higher level than the E8400 rumor lol but i think they work on the same principle of people believing rumors, myths and lies because they want to or because every one around them tells them its fact.. when it clearly is not
| ocguy31 wrote : The hype surrounding these chips, on this board and others, has caused everyone who can access BIOS to screw with the FSB. They think that because one person got 4.2ghz on air with thiers, that they should try. People spend much time reading about messing with RAM timings and the FSB, and have no idea what voltages are, or what is safe/unsafe. I dont feel sorry for people that burn chips this way. I actually saw a guy bitch that he couldnt get his over 4ghz (33% OC!!!) so he was RMAing it. Ludicrous. |
Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn.
| JonnyRock wrote : Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. |
nice words, very true
Heh... it all boils down to:
1.) Having the correct most updated bios.
2.) Knowing a work around (Disabling DTS Feature on some MB).
3.) Understanding the 3 sensors (Tcase,Tjuction)
4.) Having some accuracy on ambient temps.
5.) Having good airflow.
6.) And knowing how to correctly install the HSF on a 775 socket MB.
Also knowing the right kind of chipsets on MB that can handle OC better. I find it kind of crazy to OC to 4ghz myself, but still impressive without water cooling. I find 3-3.6ghz fast enough.
But there are unhappy people out there, wanting to put their mark somewhere to stress out their frustrations. I find it kinda funny how some people call the sensor problem that serious when they don't understand how the problem occurs. As well with the Phenom bug, which people don't seem to understand it, and want to totally avoid it. But then, to get random BSOD is just frustrating all in its own, when your trying to get more speed out of it.
One of these days, we'll look back at this and laugh our butts off when the technology advances to a higher level.
. o O (remember the days when the...)
AMD Fanboys are looking for anything true or not to make them feel like AMD isn't sooo bad. I think it is related to depression. A depressed person wants everyone else to be a fraked up too... That way his life doesn't seem to bad...
Now that fanboys do not have something factual to base their arguments on, they are simply flaming to get attention..
If there was a problem with the new Intel processors, why would only the wolfdales suffer from it? The already released QX9650 is immune? It's the same core people.
Misery... loves company. `Metallica
The funny thing is this is a free voice for morons.As humans we tend to gravitate to negatives,and the few thats rashanal are lost in the see of fanboy-ism on any side.We all have a little Thunderman in us ,some show it more than others
| Grimmy wrote : 2.) Knowing a work around (Disabling DTS Feature on some MB).
|
What's this DTS? Is that the DTS for the onboard sound or what? Sorry, having a brain fart right now.
MrsBytch wrote :
Spoken like a true Intel fanboy. You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006? |
hahahaha pwned !!
Soooo true.
MrsBytch wrote :
|
You make zero sense and compare apples to oranges.
The problem with the Phenom is its bugs and its LOW PERFORMANCE WHEN COMPARED TO THE OVER YEAR OLD Q6600.
And I'm sorry, saying some of the E8400s don't OC as well as others does not make it defective. Does it run great at standard settings? Yes? Not deffective. Seeing people OC the thing to 4+ Ghz is eye opening. People having problems with their E8400 OCing to 4Ghz? Sorry about your luck, but the chip still works great at 3Ghz as it was marketed to when you purchased it.
But please continue to compare the very impressive dual core Wolfdale to the under performing, more expensive quad core Phenom.
And this is coming from a guy that's really rooting for AMD.
| Quote : If the same lie about the E8400's is repeated enough times, does it become fact in some people's minds?
|
Reply to physx7
MrsBytch wrote :
|
Are you trying to provide an example to the quoted statement?
| gwolfman wrote : What's this DTS? Is that the DTS for the onboard sound or what? Sorry, having a brain fart right now. |
Digital Thermal Sensor. I may have got it mixed up in my mind with (off the CPU OC'ing Section):
| Quote : PECI %u2013 This stands for Platform Environment Control Interface - disable or enable. This affects how your DTS (Digital Thermal Sensors) report the core temps of your CPU. I have mine enabled and have read several posts now that suggest having it enabled does indeed give more accurate core temps. I can%u2019t say if you want it on or off in your system. |
This was off another thread:
| yomamafor1 wrote : This is from Intel's own documentary:
Courtesy of Spud, who posted this earlier. So in other words, Intel does inform the public about such errata, but most Average Joe users just don't care enough to look through these white papers. |
MrsBytch wrote :
Spoken like a true Intel fanboy. You mean just like the Intel fanboys while they were getting spanked by AMD from 2003 to 2006? |
End of discussion? Guess she didn't get her crystal ball back yet.
Well... Phenom has a B3 Stepping that is to correct that problem. I mean if it wasn't really that serious, then why bother to even have a B3 stepping or articles explain that?
Now if there an actual serious problem with the E8400, shouldn't we be seeing a new stepping soon that says the DTS is now fixed? So far I haven't seen anything on that. But then I'm not looking forward in getting another dual core.
| Grimmy wrote : Digital Thermal Sensor. I may have got it mixed up in my mind with (off the CPU OC'ing Section):
This was off another thread: |
Thanks, i *now remember reading about it too
MrsBytch wrote :
|
. o O (?)
AMD Phenom B3 stepping confirmed to fix TLB erratum - Friday, 11 January 2008
| Quote : Since not long after the release of AMD's Phenom series of CPUs, we've been informed that the infamous TLB erratum which plagues these parts, impacting their performance, will be fixed in a forthcoming 'B3' stepping. However, this assertion has been thrown into doubt in recent days due to an article on French web site EreNumeRique, which was later picked up by The Inquirer, suggesting that the erratum had not been fixed in the 'B3' stepping, creating the need for AMD to go back to the drawing board yet again for another spin of the silicon.
|
Phenom B3 is right around the corner... - Date: February 9th, 2008
| Quote : The bouncing ball release schedule for the long awaited Phenom B3 revision that fixes the Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) errata has taken a favorable bounce according to our sources. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) plans on releasing three versions into the retail market in the early April time frame. Fortunately for consumers, it appears that AMD will change the product designations in order to differentiate the B3 series from the current B2 release. |
AMD Plans to Introduce New AMD Phenom Chips in April - 02/08/2008
| Quote : AMD Phenom processor models 9550 (2.20GHz), 9650 (2.30GHz) and 9750 (2.40GHz) will be released commercially about eight weeks from now, sometime in April, a source familiar with the world’s second largest x86 chipmaker’s plans said. The new chips will be based on the B3 revision of the processor and will not have any issues with Translation Lookaside Buffer. The destiny of the high-speed AMD Phenom 9950 is unclear at the moment.
|
What have you been reading?
Phenom's suck
e8400's suck
I'm sticking to my C3-650
<Edit>woops forgot to add j/k</Edit>
This thread is degenerating fast. I think both situations are over blown unless you run a server. Anyways, Ive read that Intel plans on a more aggressive bin culling that may stop the "it wont oc to xxxx" crap. Lets hope so, cause I like what Intels been doing. So, unless youre running a server and got burnt by the TLD bug, or bought a Wolfy that doesnt oc like you thought it would, just cool it, both are known to happen and thats just the way it is
Typical MrsBytch right here. Like normal every post from MrsBytch is either wrong or just utter BS
| JonnyRock wrote : Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. |
Whats wrong with porn?
Quoting Newegg Reviews = Fail
I think anyone who OC's anything on their PC should be charged with theft because they are stealing from the poor old chipmakers.
I have a E8400...I use an aftermarket HSF,problem solved...and 4.2ghz to boot!!!
| NewbieTechGodII wrote : I think anyone who OC's anything on their PC should be charged with theft because they are stealing from the poor old chipmakers. |
. o O (what?)
You spend your hard earn money on something that GIVES you (I'm talking bios settings) features to OC the CPU or Memory (products for enthusiasts) or even buy video cards that are OC'd and maybe try to get a lil more out of it, and you call it stealling?
That's like saying... I think people that alter the cars to use bio diesel should be charged with theft because they are stealing from old oil companies.
The only thing those two things do share, is making a better product work better.
| JonnyRock wrote : Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. |
that is as true as mathmatics
| JonnyRock wrote : Its called "Common Sense", something that seems to have disappeared from the worlds population some where around 1985 and replaced with 24 hour TV, Mass Media (hype) and followed a decade or so later by the internet. The internet allow everyone to consume as much BS as they produce, creating an intellectual vacuum, which was filled by fanboys and porn. |
Going by your definition I would have called that "Citizen's Band Radio" that disappeared; it fits all the descriptions you ascribe to the Internet.... it disappeared around 1985... was replaced by 24 hour TV, Mass Media, and "Information Overload"... and cell phones.
Back then people would talk trash... and everyone would get the message to meet at 7-11 for coffee.
Now they talk trash... and everyone gets intant messaged to meet at Starbucks.
(And the level of intelligence on both the Internet now and the CB radio back then is surprisingly similar.)
There are 720 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

