The CPU Cooler reviews are one of the worst collection of reviwes I have ever seen THG do.
#1) They Failed Every Cooler that requires a Backplate, even though that is often a superior Design. I could understand breaking Coolers down into categories that do and do not require removing the motherboard. If somebody was going to upgrade a cooler, they may not want to do that. If they are building a new system, it's a non issue and is required for many of the better coolers. To simply "Fail" the best coolers due to subjective personal preference is poor work.
#2) Methodology: Closed Case results are far more important than open benchmark tests.
#3) Poor Selection of Parts: Many unusual coolers were selected and mainstream ones not included.
#4) Unusual Results: The results found here are often out of wack with reviews of the same product by numerous other sites. An explanation as to the possible differences should be noted in the article. What did you do right that everyone else did wrong?
While this article had an ambitious goal, it failed miserably.
I would suggest that the regulars here make a point of NOT referring posters to that article as reference to the worthiness of any CPU Cooler. If you must, other reviews should also be linked to allow for counter-views since often THG stands alone in its opinion of many of the coolers.
#1) They Failed Every Cooler that requires a Backplate, even though that is often a superior Design. I could understand breaking Coolers down into categories that do and do not require removing the motherboard. If somebody was going to upgrade a cooler, they may not want to do that. If they are building a new system, it's a non issue and is required for many of the better coolers. To simply "Fail" the best coolers due to subjective personal preference is poor work.
#2) Methodology: Closed Case results are far more important than open benchmark tests.
#3) Poor Selection of Parts: Many unusual coolers were selected and mainstream ones not included.
#4) Unusual Results: The results found here are often out of wack with reviews of the same product by numerous other sites. An explanation as to the possible differences should be noted in the article. What did you do right that everyone else did wrong?
While this article had an ambitious goal, it failed miserably.
I would suggest that the regulars here make a point of NOT referring posters to that article as reference to the worthiness of any CPU Cooler. If you must, other reviews should also be linked to allow for counter-views since often THG stands alone in its opinion of many of the coolers.