Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

32mb cache WD or seagate

Last response: in Storage
Share
March 5, 2009 2:49:55 PM

Hello guys I am considering buying a 500 gig harddisk with 32 mb cache, my 2 options are
WD WD5001AALS 5 year warranty
or Segate st3500320as 3 year warranty
i am buying in Pakistan, and WD costs about 8USD more than Segate, so which is better choice
a)if price is not considered
b)If price to performance ratio is considered

More about : 32mb cache seagate

a b G Storage
March 6, 2009 6:21:38 AM

Definitely WD. Seagate is decent, but WD makes better quality HD's. Performance is about the same.
March 6, 2009 8:37:21 AM

I am being told that the 'new' seagate's 7200.12 with 16mb cache series is BETTER than the relavtively older counterpart (who had 32mb cache)
can it be true?
Related resources
March 6, 2009 8:51:14 AM

Yes the 7200.12 are better than te precious because the 7200.12 have a single platter 500GB, thus reducing the latency and power consumption...So they are better...
a b G Storage
March 6, 2009 2:32:22 PM

There was an article just put out that I seem to have misplaced. The gist of the article was that new seagate was rated real low for it's response time in data retrieval.
a b G Storage
March 6, 2009 9:39:40 PM

+1....That's a great HD.
March 7, 2009 12:04:14 AM

I prefer the WD. The jury is still out on the 7200.12 reliability.
March 8, 2009 3:14:50 PM

thanks, yeah its great, i guess cavier black will eat out 7200.12 of seagate, i will wait , it will ship to my country in like 1~2 weeks, so till that time if nothing else comes up, its Cavier black!
a b G Storage
March 8, 2009 8:29:40 PM

good choice
!