Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » CPU Temperature Confusion
 

CPU Temperature Confusion




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : CPU Temperature Confusion
 
What's the deal jackball?
Profile: stranger
More Information

I am confused about temperature readings I am getting from my CPU. I know that there is an entire guide posted related to the subject, but my problem is in my inconsistent readings. My BIOS typically shows my CPU at 36c. idling. Nvidia NTune shows my CPU temperature at around 32c. idling. Core Temp shows my core temps at 47c. and 50c. while idling...a huge difference. My CPU is an Intel E8400 @ 3.6ghz/1600fsb on a XFX 780i SLI board....OC'd obviously. I am running an Arctic Cooling Freezer 7 Pro in a well ventilated Thermaltake Armor case. Do I have anything to worry about? Any information would be appreciated

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Forum Master
More Information

It depends. How high is your voltage? How much time does your cpu stay @ 100% load?
If the answer is "lots", yes you have something to worry about.
If you dont really need that oc, dial it back a little.
Intel needs to let your mobo know what the tjunction is for your chip. Without that piece of info, you can not know what temp your chip is at.
There are a lot of people being very careful with your chip because the HK/MG is still a bit of an unknown. There is the potential for a "SNDS" type problem.
If 3.6 is the max speed you can get prime stable, I would suggest you dial it back 100 or 200mhz.

What's the deal jackball?
Profile: stranger
More Information

Okay. I'm back. As far as the voltages go, I manually set my CPU voltage to 1.25V, my FSB voltage to 1.2V, my memory voltage to 1.85V (4-4-4-12 timings), SPP to 1.4V, MCP to 1.5V, and SPP<--->MCP to 1.2V. The voltages I set did not seem that high compared to the auto settings in my BIOS. With auto on and the OC changes the voltages were set to 1.31V for the CPU, 1.3V for the FSB, and the other settings were the same due to no changes being made by me. MY CPU rarely sees 100% usage although I really haven't stressed out my system with Prime or anything. Since my post, I have set the CPU and FSB to stock speeds, but I have left the memory timings alone at 4-4-4-12 which is what the RAM is rated at anyway. I am a bit of a novice when it comes to overclocking and I can use all the information and assistance anybody is willing to provide. Thanks endyen, perhaps I should try running Prime to check stability.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

There are 3... sensors on your C2D chip.

 

One is the Tcase, bios and speedfan or your MB temp app will read this sensor. It is basically between the 2 cores or more like the IHS temp. This will give you a typically lower temp.

 

The other 2 are on the cores (DTS sensors) themselves, which will give you a hotter/higher reading.

 

Also Speedfan will show a CPU temp, then also Core temps. Now if you know what the max Tjuction is, then you should know how to offset the temp readings for the cores. If your CPU has a Tjunction temp of 100C, SpeedFan's (4.33 version) core readings will be 15C off, because it thinks the Tj max is 85C, for an example.

 

Themal spec's that you may get from Intel, example 72C would be the max temp on the Tcase sensor. The max Tjuction would be for the cores.


Message edited by Grimmy on 03-08-2008 at 06:55:32 PM
What's the deal jackball?
Profile: stranger
More Information

I really appreciate the help. It's starting to make a little bit more sense now. Okay, I just ran Prime95 using the stock CPU and FSB speeds for about 3 hours. My core temps were running about 63c. and 60c. according to Core Temp. The other temp, Tcase from what I understand now, was at 47c. The Tj max according to Core Temp is 105c. Correct me if I am wrong, but from what I understand my temps are relatively normal. If I start to see the core temps, after stressing them out, in the 75c.-85c. range I should begin to worry.

I hope I am understanding this correctly.

Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

Yes. I hope it makes more sense now, especially when you fall back an read the guide, and just compare the temps with the CPU that your using to get a better idea to where your temps fall within good thermal spec's. :D

 

Even PM CompuTronix, I'm sure he'll be able to help you that way with any other specific questions.

 

edit:

 

Scale 2: Duo
E8x00: Tcase Max 72c, C0 Stepping, Tjunction Max 105c, Vcore Default 1.250, TDP 65w, Delta 15c
E8x90: Tcase Max 72c, C0 Stepping, Tjunction Max 105c, Vcore Default 1.250, TDP 65w, Delta 15c

-Tcase/Tjunction-
--70--/--85--85-- Hot
--65--/--80--80-- Warm
--60--/--75--75-- Safe
|---------------------------So your somewhere there 47/--63 -kinda below safe (I guess you could say).
--25--/--40--40-- Cool


Message edited by Grimmy on 03-08-2008 at 10:00:25 PM
What's the deal jackball?
Profile: stranger
More Information

Thank you very much for the help....I feel a lot better now. I guess now I can kind of see how far I can push the processor with overclocking since I have a better understanding of the temps. I don't really want to overdo it either. I think 3.6ghz or so is my limit.

Thanks again!


  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » CPU Temperature Confusion

Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

Western Digital to end HDD part code confusion

Published on April 01, 2004

Hard disk manufacturer Western Digital today pledged that the confusion surrounding the supply of its ultra-quiet hard drives based on its new Fluid Dynamic Bearing (FDB) technology should come to an end this month. Read more

Flexible Display Market To Reach $2.8 Billion By 2013, Says ISuppli

Published on June 10, 2008

Flexible displays are playing an increasingly important role in the global high-tech industry, serving as the crucial enabling technology for a new generation of portable devices designed to combine mobility with compelling user interfaces. Read more

OSD unveils 3.5" LCD panel with touch panel and LED backlight

Published on November 18, 2005

One Stop Displays (OSD) announced its new 3.5" full VGA transflective TFT LCD (OSDT035STEE1) that includes an integrated touch panel and a white LED backlight. Read more

Security vendors team against spyware

Published on February 01, 2006

A group of security vendors today announced they have joined forces to reduce confusion surrounding identifying and eliminating spyware. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more

1,000 GB: Three Samsung TB Drives

Published on September 23, 2008

Storage vendors split the desktop hard drive market into performance, mainstream, and energy-efficient products. We looked at Samsung’s Spinpoint F, the RAID version and the EcoGreen F to discover how a 1,000 GB drive differs from another. Read more