Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Why is ATI 3870 so slow?

Why is ATI 3870 so slow?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Why is ATI 3870 so slow?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Ask the community Add a reply

Bottom Search this thread

Look at the ATI 3870's specs. Its a beast!

- Higher frequency's across the board (GPU,SHADER,MEMORY).

- 80 Vertex Pipelines as opposed to 28 from 8800GT

- More raw Processing power then 8800 GT

- Higher Memory bandwidth 72GB vs 56GB

- 320 Stream Processors!!! vs. 112 from 8800GT

It has one lower spec, texturing units 16 vs the 8800GT's 56

What is the deal with this card it should be running monster numbers?
Really Really bad driver issues?

Add a reply

The 320 stream processors on a 3870 are not the same as the 112 on an 8800GT. A Geforce 8 series stream processor is quite a bit faster than what ATI calls a stream processor, but that is why they have so many more. I own both the HD3870 and an 8800GTX and while the HD3870 is a fast card, my 8800GTX is quite a bit faster especially with antialiasing enabled at higher resolutions. In general, the 8800GT is faster than the HD3870, although the card is no slouch, and does have Direct X10.1 support, if service pack one ever releases.

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to Heyyou27

The only real benefit for the HD3870 that I have noticed compared to my 8800GTX OC2 is the color is much better with the HD3870. That’s it, oh and all games, the frames rates are hands down in favor of the 8800GTX. (all games that I own)

------------------------------ And on the third day, God created the Remington bolt-action rifle, so that Man could fight the dinosaurs. And the homosexuals.
Reply to spaztic7

the 3870 is going to out perform any other card you can get for under $200.

sure you could spend 3 times that for a GTX, but why?

Message edited by Oh SoS on 02-22-2008 at 06:08:53 PM

Reply to Oh SoS

From what I read the 3870 has an insane amount of shaders but only a few texture units. The opposite is true for Nvidia's cards. The 3870 is mainly designed for dx10 as it is shader dependent(dx10 means a VISTA ONLY game...a dx9 game with "dx10" add-ins is still primarily using texture fill rate instead of shaders) and the Nvidia cards are designed more for dx9. Also in dx9 AA is done with texture units giving the reason for the 3870s poor handling of current games AA.

There are zero games that are true DX10 games (vista only seeing xp doesnt support dx10...new api and all) and therefore the 3870 and other current ATI cards wont perform up to what they can. Not sure why ATI didnt put a few more texture units in the 3870s so they could compete in dx9 but until a true dx10 game is released Nvidia will outperform ATI in games.

Message edited by blotch on 02-22-2008 at 07:10:47 PM

------------------------------ Q6600 @ 3.5Ghz(1.5V), Zalman 9700 as5, ASUS P5E , Crossfire 2X 3870xt ,8Gigs RAM (4x2) @ DDR2 800 4-4-4-12, Gigabyte Odin 800W PSU, 2X WD 640AAKS HDD Raid0, Vista 64-bit, XClio case, 24" KDS 1900x1200

Reply to blotch

blotch is correct, more shaders less texturing units comparatively. it has raw power, just not aimed in the current direction, the card will only get better as it matures.

------------------------------ AMD 5000+BE Brisbane: Arctic Cooling Freezer Pro 64: Raidmax Smilodon w/500w PSU: Gigabyte HD 3870 w/Ultra Durable 2: 2x 1gig G-Skill DDR2 800: Gigabyte GA-M57SLI-S4: Samsung Spinpoint hd321kj: samsug dvd burner: Wireless logitech perfs, thumb ball mouse:
Reply to nachowarrior

Don't forget AA resolve is handled by hardware in the HD series, whereas the GF8-9 series has dedicated hardware, which is fine for titles that do not require the shader based AA which both can do, but on which the HD series relies on for even normal AA.

Even though the HD series may have more potential shader power, alot of it depends on how it's used, and using the shaders is very inefficient if the app doesn't call for or require it.

OP, try a SEARCH next time, already asked already answered many times.

------------------------------ You need a license to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp (or internet account) - RED GREEN. GA to SK
HD Freedom: 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
Reply to TheGreatGrapeApe

PS - AA is done in the ROPs , and that's where the HDs lack hardware resolve. The texture issue is a different issue.

Message edited by TheGreatGrapeApe on 02-22-2008 at 11:07:23 PM

Heyyou27 wrote :

In general, the 8800GT is faster than the HD3870, although the card is no slouch, and does have Direct X10.1 support, if service pack one ever releases.

Yeah but then you won't have drivers to support it. :fou:

Reply to SpinachEater

ok, thanks for the feedback, looks like the products from ati and amd seem to be a little ahead of there time recently, thanks.

Message quoted 1 times

------------------------------ In war, truth is the first casualty.
Aeschylus
Reply to harly2

harly2 wrote :

ok, thanks for the feedback, looks like the products from ati and amd seem to be a little ahead of there time recently, thanks.

do you mean "a little ahead of there time recently" in a good way? Or a bad way? I am thinking bad, but just making sure you think so too.

Reply to grieve

Ask the community Add a reply

Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > Why is ATI 3870 so slow?

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 848 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Page generated in 0.265 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel

Focus On

Why is ATI 3870 so slow?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - Why is ATI 3870 so slow?

Please mind