First things first... No matter what doubts and questions I have, I must admit that the guide is excellent and I really appreciate the lots of research and work CompuTronix must have put into it. Now to the point...
I've read the first version of the guide and recently found that it was revised. And I was very surprised with all these changes...
[1] Delta to Tcase... Unless CompuTronix has a reasonable theory and calculations (and I suppose he has), I consider Y values to be a weak point. Where did he get those numbers from? And how should I tell whether my cooler is a "mid-low", "high-mid" or other range? Reviews differ But seriously... Where do those numbers come from?
No matter what CompuTronix answer is or might be, the truth is - readings must be offseted. My CPU would run below ambient temperature otherwise and that's impossible with air cooling (btw. stock intel cooler, but I'm going to change it soon). Before CompuTronix revised his guide I have simply substracted the expected 15* from Tj and computed Tc that way. Well, of course - assuming that the delta to Tj max (returned by CPU registers) was correct and reliable... There always must be some assumption, right?.
And once again... No matter what his answer is - that makes sense. I've computed my delta step by step, pursuant to the directions. And it works... Calibration was simple:
IDLE:
Ambient: 24.5 *
E2160 L2 idle power: 8W, X = 2
Intel stock cooler: Y = 11
Delta = (2+11)/2 = 6.5*
Tcase = 31*
core0 = 37*
core1 = 35*
LOAD:
Ambient: 24.5*
Tcase = 49*
Core0 = 56*
Core1 = 56*
Tjunction may need an offset (possibly -1*), but I consider a little bit hotter reading to be better (for safety reasons).
[2] Delta to Tjunction... OK. So it is 5*, not 15*. That changed a lot of things (and that's what worries me the most). Since it is 5*, we've lost 10*, right? Previously we had, let's say, an overclocked CPU running "safely" with Tc = 50* and Tj = 65*. Now we have a different situation - with the very same Tj (65*) we have a CPU running with 60* Tc. For a CPU with TDP = 65W and Tcase max = 61.4* it's the red, hot scale! What was the reason for that change in findings?
[3] Tcase as a limiting factor... The last doubt... Since Tcase is the limiting factor for CPU's safety (and overclocking), why does Intel rely on Tj? Why does thermal throttling depend on Tjunction? Since Tcase is the limiting factor, we should never be able to reach that point (my CPU would melt or burn in living flames at Tc = 70* and Tj only 70 + 5 = 75*, 25* below Tj max), unless...
Unless... What will happen if we cross the Tcase max? Math tells us that crossing Tcase max should always be (more or less) below Tj max. So - what are the possible consequences? Why should we stick 10* below Tcase max and not, let's say 20* below Tj max?
And one more thing... What is a possible reason for such a huge difference between different revisions of the same CPU model? The same E2160 rev. M0 has 74* Tc max and 85* Tj max, so it will be possible to put that baby higher in overclock and still within safety margins... And on the other hand: if I cross the Tc max on my L2, I will still have about 39* to Tj max. But - on the same M0 revision, if I cross the Tc max, I will have only 11* to Tj max... What is that? Different IHS construcion? What's the reason for such difference?
Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts and information regarding pointed questions and doubts...
Michael
I've read the first version of the guide and recently found that it was revised. And I was very surprised with all these changes...
[1] Delta to Tcase... Unless CompuTronix has a reasonable theory and calculations (and I suppose he has), I consider Y values to be a weak point. Where did he get those numbers from? And how should I tell whether my cooler is a "mid-low", "high-mid" or other range? Reviews differ But seriously... Where do those numbers come from?
No matter what CompuTronix answer is or might be, the truth is - readings must be offseted. My CPU would run below ambient temperature otherwise and that's impossible with air cooling (btw. stock intel cooler, but I'm going to change it soon). Before CompuTronix revised his guide I have simply substracted the expected 15* from Tj and computed Tc that way. Well, of course - assuming that the delta to Tj max (returned by CPU registers) was correct and reliable... There always must be some assumption, right?.
And once again... No matter what his answer is - that makes sense. I've computed my delta step by step, pursuant to the directions. And it works... Calibration was simple:
IDLE:
Ambient: 24.5 *
E2160 L2 idle power: 8W, X = 2
Intel stock cooler: Y = 11
Delta = (2+11)/2 = 6.5*
Tcase = 31*
core0 = 37*
core1 = 35*
LOAD:
Ambient: 24.5*
Tcase = 49*
Core0 = 56*
Core1 = 56*
Tjunction may need an offset (possibly -1*), but I consider a little bit hotter reading to be better (for safety reasons).
[2] Delta to Tjunction... OK. So it is 5*, not 15*. That changed a lot of things (and that's what worries me the most). Since it is 5*, we've lost 10*, right? Previously we had, let's say, an overclocked CPU running "safely" with Tc = 50* and Tj = 65*. Now we have a different situation - with the very same Tj (65*) we have a CPU running with 60* Tc. For a CPU with TDP = 65W and Tcase max = 61.4* it's the red, hot scale! What was the reason for that change in findings?
[3] Tcase as a limiting factor... The last doubt... Since Tcase is the limiting factor for CPU's safety (and overclocking), why does Intel rely on Tj? Why does thermal throttling depend on Tjunction? Since Tcase is the limiting factor, we should never be able to reach that point (my CPU would melt or burn in living flames at Tc = 70* and Tj only 70 + 5 = 75*, 25* below Tj max), unless...
Unless... What will happen if we cross the Tcase max? Math tells us that crossing Tcase max should always be (more or less) below Tj max. So - what are the possible consequences? Why should we stick 10* below Tcase max and not, let's say 20* below Tj max?
And one more thing... What is a possible reason for such a huge difference between different revisions of the same CPU model? The same E2160 rev. M0 has 74* Tc max and 85* Tj max, so it will be possible to put that baby higher in overclock and still within safety margins... And on the other hand: if I cross the Tc max on my L2, I will still have about 39* to Tj max. But - on the same M0 revision, if I cross the Tc max, I will have only 11* to Tj max... What is that? Different IHS construcion? What's the reason for such difference?
Thanks in advance for sharing your thoughts and information regarding pointed questions and doubts...
Michael