3dmark06 is extremely cpu bound, but that being said, that is a low score for that setup. What is your cpu score? Run Prime95 torture test and bringup task manager to make sure both cores are running at 100% I'd say with that setup, you should receive a score of somewhere around 9000 - 9500 for your 3dmark score, and around 2000 for your cpu score (there is a cpu chart here at toms, but I'm too lazy to look it up)
AMD cool N quiet shouldn't come into play, but I'd turn it off if I were you just to remove any question as to this being the problem.
I disagree with AMD being "crappy". Sure it's not as fast as a core 2, but come on... AMD makes GREAT processors and they are perfect for a budget build. Just a couple of years ago AMD was praised with how great their processors were; just because intel came out with something better doesn't make AMD crap.
it's like someone (AMD) saying $1000000 is a lot of money
then someone else (INTEL) saying $1200000 is a lot of money
then someone (you) saying oh crap, you're right... $1000000 is crappy amount of money.
Hmmm... try updating your drivers. Could be something with your BIOS settings. Disable cool'n quiet then run CPU-Z before you run 3Dmark to make sure everything is running at the proper speed.
------------------------------Playing X-Men Origins: Wolverine Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 4GB Mushkin DDR2 1066 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500W | APEVIA X-Dreamer Black | Win XP Pro & Vista Buisness 32bit
Reply to megamanx00
I disagree with AMD being "crappy". Sure it's not as fast as a core 2, but come on... AMD makes GREAT processors and they are perfect for a budget build. Just a couple of years ago AMD was praised with how great their processors were; just because intel came out with something better doesn't make AMD crap.
it's like someone (AMD) saying $1000000 is a lot of money
then someone else (INTEL) saying $1200000 is a lot of money
then someone (you) saying oh crap, you're right... $1000000 is crappy amount of money.
thats why i ask him to list all his score in 3dmark06.i want to know what he get for each graphics card score and CPU score.
5000+ gets 10K with 8800GT if it's overclocked to 3GHz. I can't see it barely getting 6K at stock. That's like losing 4K marks for 400MHz deficit. I suspect the CPU is not the only problem.
the 5000+ at 2.6Ghz should get less then 2k so if the graphics card dont have the rest 8K then maybe its driver for the graphics card and mobo aka chipset driver.
yeah i get about 18000 marks in 3dmark now as well I have a 4870 though
but i imagine its either a core is disabled in bios, or its software problems
try booting up w/o as many processes, you can turn off most of the processes in msconfig (type msconfig in the run command on the start menu), but make sure when your done that you remember to turn everything back on... I forgot once and couldn't figure out why i couldn't print my HW
I disagree with AMD being "crappy". Sure it's not as fast as a core 2, but come on... AMD makes GREAT processors and they are perfect for a budget build. Just a couple of years ago AMD was praised with how great their processors were; just because intel came out with something better doesn't make AMD crap.
it's like someone (AMD) saying $1000000 is a lot of money
then someone else (INTEL) saying $1200000 is a lot of money
then someone (you) saying oh crap, you're right... $1000000 is crappy amount of money.
i bet it has nothing to do with power to your cores or your psu, check that your gfx card is running at pci-x speed 16 and not 1 as that will bottleneck your gfx card. as for solutions you can either move the card into another pcix slot if you have one, try changeing the pci frequency to 101 instead of 100 in bios. if all else fails rma the mobo.
How long does 3dmark06 take to download it says like 7 hours on my download, is this really how long it takes to download or am i downloading from the wrong website or something?
Message edited by INSPECTOR71 on 09-13-2008 at 02:19:45 PM
I am using comcast cable and always download things fairly quick and i am using a motorola modem. I think it is the website i am downloading from because this seems out of the ordinary, something like this just takes usually 30 seconds ,This is taking hours.
Message edited by INSPECTOR71 on 09-13-2008 at 02:58:00 PM
Your setup should get around 9500.
Make sure you are running at your monitors default res.
Make sure vertical sync is turned off.
Make sure you completely unistalled any old video drivers.
You do have a PSU that can run the 8800GT, right?
yeah i get about 18000 marks in 3dmark now as well I have a 4870 though
but i imagine its either a core is disabled in bios, or its software problems
try booting up w/o as many processes, you can turn off most of the processes in msconfig (type msconfig in the run command on the start menu), but make sure when your done that you remember to turn everything back on... I forgot once and couldn't figure out why i couldn't print my HW
Thats great thogrom but unfortunately this isnt about, who has the highest 3dmark 06 score cause i get 20,839 on an oced q6600, burn , just kidding i could really care less about 3dmark 06 now (not kidding on the score tho) And i highly doubt that his score is below average cause on a oced e4600 at 3ish ghz and a 9600gt i can get anywhere from just over 10,000 to low 11,000 with a higher oc, now considering how old the 5000+ is and that it only has 512kb cache per core id say this 8800gt is severely bottlenecked and his proc i just to old to get good results in 3dmark
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.