hey guys not sure if this is the appropriate section for this, but please move it if needed!
So I just want to learn more by means of a free education. I'm trying to understand all the different stuff about cpus/motherboards. if someone can elaborate an explanation about what the various numbers mean I would appreciate it. I know how to calculate the speeds, I just don't understand the WHY behind it.
so my motherboard has an FSB of 1600. what does that mean exactly?
my processor (e2160) is rated at 800mhz with a speed of 1.8Ghz, and a multiplier of 9 (i think)... what does all this stuff mean? again, I understand how to calculate the 1.8Ghz, but i'm confused about the need of a multiplier, what purpose does it serve?
From what I've read, the multiplier means that the cpu performs 9 (in my case) cycles for every 1 cycle of the motherboard. Why? Does that mean that all modern motherboards have a bottleneck in FSB, and the processor is working 9 times less efficiently?
Theoretically speaking, assuming my previous statement about the FSB bottleneck is correct, the best performance from a system can be expected when there is no cpu multiplier? So in this case, the cpu would complete 1 cycle for every 1 cycle of the motherboard??? I have to assume that I'm wrong about all of this, but if I'm right why is FSB technology so far behind? I mean we've had cpu multipliers since 486...
Thanks!
So I just want to learn more by means of a free education. I'm trying to understand all the different stuff about cpus/motherboards. if someone can elaborate an explanation about what the various numbers mean I would appreciate it. I know how to calculate the speeds, I just don't understand the WHY behind it.
so my motherboard has an FSB of 1600. what does that mean exactly?
my processor (e2160) is rated at 800mhz with a speed of 1.8Ghz, and a multiplier of 9 (i think)... what does all this stuff mean? again, I understand how to calculate the 1.8Ghz, but i'm confused about the need of a multiplier, what purpose does it serve?
From what I've read, the multiplier means that the cpu performs 9 (in my case) cycles for every 1 cycle of the motherboard. Why? Does that mean that all modern motherboards have a bottleneck in FSB, and the processor is working 9 times less efficiently?
Theoretically speaking, assuming my previous statement about the FSB bottleneck is correct, the best performance from a system can be expected when there is no cpu multiplier? So in this case, the cpu would complete 1 cycle for every 1 cycle of the motherboard??? I have to assume that I'm wrong about all of this, but if I'm right why is FSB technology so far behind? I mean we've had cpu multipliers since 486...
Thanks!