Hello,
I'm currently working on a project where I would need to stream hi-resolution (4069x4069 & 4096x2048) video onto the graphics card and I'm currently trying to define the specs of both the video and the graphics card.
So far I've tested this on an SLI'ed system that uses a PCIe16 and a PCIe4 to very bad results. It seems when SLI'ed it just defaults to the slowest bus speed. In this case, PCIe4x. Does anyone have a new 2xPCIe16x or even better 3xPCIe16x system on Windows XP that would be willing to run a quick bench mark test for me?
The benchmark is NOT a video. It is a single executable that is 87k compressed.
http://hyperfileshare.com/d/8474a25d
So far I've only gotten this run at 20fps on a Quadro 4500.
Edit: Forgot to mention. Press space to go into 2 PBO (Pixel Buffer Objects) it should run a bit faster on most machines. Check the command prompt for the FPS.
Thanks a ton in advance.
I'm currently working on a project where I would need to stream hi-resolution (4069x4069 & 4096x2048) video onto the graphics card and I'm currently trying to define the specs of both the video and the graphics card.
So far I've tested this on an SLI'ed system that uses a PCIe16 and a PCIe4 to very bad results. It seems when SLI'ed it just defaults to the slowest bus speed. In this case, PCIe4x. Does anyone have a new 2xPCIe16x or even better 3xPCIe16x system on Windows XP that would be willing to run a quick bench mark test for me?
The benchmark is NOT a video. It is a single executable that is 87k compressed.
http://hyperfileshare.com/d/8474a25d
So far I've only gotten this run at 20fps on a Quadro 4500.
Edit: Forgot to mention. Press space to go into 2 PBO (Pixel Buffer Objects) it should run a bit faster on most machines. Check the command prompt for the FPS.
Thanks a ton in advance.