Thanks for your replies and sorry for my late reply. I'm preparing to move and can only post late at night.
I wasn't very clear so I'll try again. Both Speedfan and Real Temp require lowering the cpu voltage and frequency. With my BIOS, I can raise the cpu voltage but I can't lower it. It really bites not being able to lower the voltage for the reasons Zorg stated.
With my stock VID of 1.325 and my CPU @ 3.0GHz my vdrop (idle) is 1.296-1.312 and vdroop (loaded Prime95 short fft's) is 1.264-1.272. I imagine it's not much of a difference if I lower the FSB.
My temps are decent, I was just wondering how much if any not being able to lower the CPU vcore would matter. I was also trying to figure out which temperature app. was most accurate. I haven't changed Real Temps Tjmax which is at 95. My best estimate is that a calibrated Real Temp is better for my idle temps and a calibrated Speedfan is better at load temps. Core Temp (with factory settings) is kinda in the middle with 2 warmer cores. I have lapped my CPU and my Xiggy S1283 has dual Antec Tri-Cools set on med. (1600 rpms). My case is also full of Tri-cools and one Zalman ZM-F3 in the blowhole position where my push-pull Xiggy aims. Any thoughts of which if any are accurate?
Q6600 @ 3.0GHz loaded with Prime95 short FFT's all fans on med. Ambient 22-23C.
Core Temp 55,55,47,49
Speedfan 51,51,50,50 *Tcase=45 - 46
Real Temp 50,50,46,44
Q6600 @ 3.0GHz idle all fans on med. and ambient 22-23C.
Core Temp 35,34,27,33
Speedfan 32,33,30,34 Tcase=26
Real Temp 29,29,29,29
Zorg, Your right. It's not something I need to loose sleep over. I'm more curious about it than anything. I've tried many things to lower my temps according to Core Temp (extra fans, lapping, going from a Xiggy SD964 to a S1283) and I've not seen but a 1 or 2 degree difference. Calibrating my other 2 apps lowered my temps more than anything LOL. I just want to know if it was worth it and/or semi-accurate.