No overclocking or temperature comparison? I was interested in that, and it's the only reason I started reading it in the first place. I only hope you include these things in the Intel article - since they are so crucial to the enthusiast community (which makes up the majority of the daily readers of this site).
Edit: also no mention of the difference in operating voltage between 90 & 65nm parts (1.184/1.184 & 1.328/1.344, respectively from the CPU-Z shots). Why the .14-.16 voltage bump when you're going to a smaller manufacturing tech? How did the 90nm stepping cut so much power when it's running at the same voltage as the original?