Has anyone else seen the system specs for assassins creed yet, At least Crytec tryed to make the game accesable to as many people as posssable, well it does mean more sales. Ubisoft seem to have taken the well this is what it takes to run it propperly and if you cant meet the spec tough aproach.
Im in two minds as to if this is a good or bad thing, either way it seems that its time to start looking towards 512 cards as a must.
Your thoughts ?
Mactronix
From what I've heard, it's visually very stunning, but gameplay is not that innovative. What I'd prefer seeing, than more FPS and assassin style games with stunning environments that one does not really interact with, are more single player CRPG's with stunning immersive environments where one can interact with every aspect of the environment.
Perhaps the next Elder Scrolls will deliver that type of environment? It's not even announced, but it's a given. I'd say it won't get announced until after Bethsoft finishes Fallout 3.
------------------------------Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
The requirements are that high because the game is basically a console port. Ubisoft made it run on a computer and then stopped working on it to save money. The money they saved is money the consumer has to pay for high-end hardware now.
Optimizing costs time and money. They never took a look at R6 Vegas either and that game still runs like crap on high end hardware - at least that's what i'm told. I suppose we will see more like that in the future.
@ Yips
Thats about what i have heard, i was hoping it was going to be more like thief, and i agree more interaction would be welcomed. Again only going on word of mouth but there are meant to be no go areas, so that you have to do things one way or not at all. Some walls can be climbed but identical walls cant etc.
As Slobogob says its a port so i guess it was to be expected.
The next Elder scrolls will as you say most likley be very good. We will prob all be on DX 11/ 12 by then though Mactronix
Message edited by mactronix on 03-06-2008 at 12:23:36 PM
To heck with that. Google Fary Cry2. I think the machine to run that will come out by 2020.
At the high end yes but as i mentioned about Crysis, Far Cry 2 looks like its been scaled properly so you can at least run it on a older system.
Ok so it wont be as pretty, I have a 3000+ machine that runs Crysis ok, It looks like the original Far Cry did on a 9800 which was top of the line back then, but i have to have every thing on low. So obviously im missing the eye candy.
Given all the bad feedback about playability i will probably give Assassins creed a miss. I was really only drawing attention to the level of hardware that is becoming the norm with the newer releases.
Is it a good or bad thing that it will force people to upgrade or just not play the games. As i said im not sure, on the one hand people who cant afford it are being hard done by, on the other is it worth the extra expense vs consumer base increase to do the scaling. Guess this is where we find out.
Mactronix
Sounds like lazy developers again. They can't be bothererd to optimise there code properly. Thats why it will use 3gb of ram. Because it will just dump large textures into ram and hope for the best and the cpu will be eating up lots off cycles just trying to process the junk.
The cost of upgrading your systems to play this would be pointless. For the money it will cost you can buy a used Core 360 a used copy of the game, play it then sell the whole lot a week later having spent almost nothing.
Is the game worth it? No! Its an ok game. Its only about 8 hours long, by which time you get fed up of it anyway. The graphics are impressive but the gameplay is lacking. The novelty wears off very quickly with the various moves and you realise thats all the game has to offer.
Hey guys, I've been playing the game for a few days now on PC (yea i know it's not out yet), and it's not to bad.
They did the port pretty well (well, better then other ports ), with the mouse and keyboard layout working pretty nicely. I'm playing the game at 1920x1280 everything maxed out, and it's very very very smooth.
I'm running it on a 8800gtx, c2d e6600, 2gb ram, XP.
Graphics are ok, not crysis good, but pretty decent, looks the same as the console version for the most part.
All in all it's not a bad port at all, Smoother then I thought it would be, and they made the keyboard mouse work, which is nice (none of those; "To jump, push the left jumper button" ).
well console ports to PC tend to surpass the visual quality of the console releases as well as have higher supported resolutions and thats why they look better on PC's. I wouldn't scream bloody murder just yet until I saw some benchies with different systems and different settings. I would guess its like Colin McCrae DiRT, another console port. The game is AWESOME with all the bells and whistles at 1920x1080 but damn it maxes out a pair of GTX's totally, just like Crysis.
Guys I think those specs are false, I own it on 360 and it runs 60fps all the time I believe. I havent been outside in the PC version but indoors at least its locked at 160FPS with the occasional drop to 140fps. Im not even kidding, dont worry this game is not a system hog. I looked in the task manager and it was taking 600mb and Im talkin about the DX10 version
------------------------------Q6600 @ 3.6ghz
4gb Crucial Tracer Ballistix
8800GTS 512mb @ 820/1971/1077
15,782 3DMark06 in Vista x64
Reply to nkarasch
CryENGINE2 is about as stressful as it's going to get for a while as far as well written and well optimized engines go. Yes, I said it is well optimized. On very high settings Crysis can oftentimes look borderline photorealistic, which is something that I cannot say about any other game that I have ever seen. Check out the CryENGINE2 vs Reality Comparison if you don't know what I'm talking about.
Farcry 2 looks good, but I don't think it will surpass Crysis in terms of sheer technological prowess. Assassin's Creed isn't even in the same ballpark.
------------------------------Core2Duo e8400 at 4.0ghz | HIS 3870x2 1gb | Asus P5E x38
Kingston HyperX 9600 2gb | Lian Li PC-A70 | Antec TPT 750watt
3dmark06 - 19,652
Reply to iancarnage
To heck with that. Google Fary Cry2. I think the machine to run that will come out by 2020.
Not that I'm holding my breath for a FPS, but if it ever comes out, I'm getting it:
Duke Nukem' Forever!
I remember a friend playing Duke Nukem somewhere around the time I was playing Daggerfall.
What gets me is how do those guys at that company make a living if they're constantly promising a game that never arrives? What else does that studio do?
Given all the bad feedback about playability i will probably give Assassins creed a miss. I was really only drawing attention to the level of hardware that is becoming the norm with the newer releases.
Mactronix
Some things that are a miss at $49 might be worth it at $10 down the line. Then we can at least say we didn't spend too much to take screenshots of Altair standing on top of a tower in medieval Jerusalem or Damascus. Those are the visuals in all the previews that make the game look almost worth it.
You'd think they studied under Square Enix's marketing department: have a major character sitting on a roof looking across a beautiful cityscape.
Apologies to Square Enix, I actually had fun with FF7, both PS and PC. It's just that one scene during installation that's so breathtaking, you want to climb up there too; but it wasn't actually in the game itself.
In Assassin's Creed, Altair supposedly has to climb towers to get his bearings. He must have flunked Hiding While Scoping Out the Territory 101 in Assassin's school at OMM Polytechnic.
Message edited by yipsl on 03-07-2008 at 11:40:48 AM
------------------------------Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.