Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » AMD 5000+ BE vs. Intel C2D E4500
 

AMD 5000+ BE vs. Intel C2D E4500

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : AMD 5000+ BE vs. Intel C2D E4500
 
Profile: newbie
More Information

I am building a budget rig and I am looking at two very overclockable processors:
 
AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ Brisbane 2.6GHz:
http://www.newegg.com/product/prod [...] 6819103194
 
Intel Core 2 Duo E4500 Allendale 2.2GHz:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115031
 
I would like to OC to around 3ghz, but I am getting mixed opinions on which of the two I should go with.
What do you think?

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

the brisbane does not come wih a HFS so u would need to buy one and im sure u would buy one anywayz. i would go with Brisbane but allendale is a better performer and both can be OC'd to 3 GHZ no problem.

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

The E4500 is quite a bit more.
 
The E2160/E2180 would be much cheaper and still be able to outperform the X2 5000+ at the same clock speeds.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
pat
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

budget rig means lower cost. At this point, the AMD780g chipset is the best integrated solution. I would go with the 5000+ and a motherboard with the 780g chipset. Check out Biostar, Gigabyte or even the ECS 780-M.
 
This will let you more room for more RAM and bigger HDD.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

The E4500 would be about 25 - 30% faster than the X2 5000+ BE when both are clocked at 3GHz.  
 
 
 

Profile: newbie
More Information

epsilon84 wrote :

The E4500 would be about 25 - 30% faster than the X2 5000+ BE when both are clocked at 3GHz.


How so?

Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

The Intel Chips do far more work Clock for Clock than the AMD Chips.
Even the Cheaper E2xxx Series which have even less cache are much faster.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

pat wrote :

budget rig means lower cost. At this point, the AMD780g chipset is the best integrated solution. I would go with the 5000+ and a motherboard with the 780g chipset. Check out Biostar, Gigabyte or even the ECS 780-M.
 
This will let you more room for more RAM and bigger HDD.


 
Having the "Best Integrated Solution" is mostly irrelevent at this point for most users since it's still not good enough to replace a dedicated graphics card if one is needed or desired while if one is not needed or desired other integrated solutions work just fine.
 
Even at minimal graphics settings as relatively small resolutions, it could not come close to usability with the tested games which are not even the roughest.
 
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/0 [...] age11.html
 


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
pat
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

zenmaster wrote :

Having the "Best Integrated Solution" is mostly irrelevent at this point for most users since it's still not good enough to replace a dedicated graphics card if one is needed or desired while if one is not needed or desired other integrated solutions work just fine.
 
Even at minimal graphics settings as relatively small resolutions, it could not come close to usability with the tested games which are not even the roughest.
 
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/0 [...] age11.html


 
 
Depend of the purpose. For business, internet, video or movie watching, it is more than enough. As for game, I agree, but at the price the current 780 motherboard are, onboard is more like a bonus.

pat
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

epsilon84 wrote :

The E4500 would be about 25 - 30% faster than the X2 5000+ BE when both are clocked at 3GHz.

 


it is costing more too. because the BE don't need expensive cooling to OC. a simple 10$ cooler should suffice with good vented case. And in this case, the Intel will still cost 25-30% more than the BE.

 

That 25$ will be better spend on more RAM. Even a budget PC will benefit from more ram.

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by pat on 03-24-2008 at 09:34:09 PM
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

pat wrote :

Depend of the purpose. For business, internet, video or movie watching, it is more than enough. As for game, I agree, but at the price the current 780 motherboard are, onboard is more like a bonus.


 
I think it's a great board, but it will have a more targeted audience than many here will see.
 
If you toss that into the average reatail system it will be a big setup up.
Then toss in the fact you could toss in a cheap/low power/relatively cool GPU into the system and make older games run OK is nice.
 
It's also a nice board for "Low Power Systems" that you want cool and quiet due to the low powe usage.
Toss in a real low power AMD chip and it will be good to go.
 


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
Profile: Ancient Poster
More Information

pat wrote :

it is costing more too. because the BE don't need expensive cooling to OC. a simple 10$ cooler should suffice with good vented case. And in this case, the Intel will still cost 25-30% more than the BE.
 
That 25$ will be better spend on more RAM. Even a budget PC will benefit from more ram.


 
Or you could buy the E2160 which is Cheaper, Faster, and even comes with a Cooler that will run the chip at about 3.2Ghz.


---------------
If its good in theory but not in practice,
its not good theory.
pat
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

zenmaster wrote :

Or you could buy the E2160 which is Cheaper, Faster, and even comes with a Cooler that will run the chip at about 3.2Ghz.


 
 
That could be an option, but it will take a better board for FSB OC. The BE OC simply by upping the multiplier, so it is easier.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

pat wrote :

it is costing more too. because the BE don't need expensive cooling to OC. a simple 10$ cooler should suffice with good vented case. And in this case, the Intel will still cost 25-30% more than the BE.
 
That 25$ will be better spend on more RAM. Even a budget PC will benefit from more ram.


 
The E4500 doesn't require 'expensive cooling' to OC either, it actually runs cooler than the X2 5000+ BE. My E4400 does 3.33GHz on the stock HSF, and guess what, its FREE.  :whistle:  
 
RAM is so cheap nowadays I doubt the OP is getting less than the standard 2GB kit, so your argument is moot unless you are suggesting the OP get 4GB of RAM for a budget build. ;)

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

This board with a 2160 ($69) would OC just fine and give him better upgrade options in a quad at a later date.
 
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813128059


Message edited by Craxbax on 03-24-2008 at 10:04:48 PM
Sailing in my Dreams
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

I'll toss my 2 cents in and give favor to the 5000+ BE. I do have a Intel in my other computer and its been a bit more of a problem then my AMD machine. Just my personal experience.  
 
For now, though, I'm waiting for the new Yorkies to hit the market so I can build a new gaming machine.


---------------
Evil lurks in the databanks as it lurked in the streets of yesteryear. But it was never the streets that were evil.  
 
Over 50. Seen it, done it, can't remember it.
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

pat wrote :

That could be an option, but it will take a better board for FSB OC. The BE OC simply by upping the multiplier, so it is easier.

 

The E21x0 chips are stock 800FSB (as are the E4x00 chips). This means you don't need a high end mobo to get decent overclocks, an E2160 at 3GHz will be running at 1333FSB, which is the standard FSB speed for the higher end C2Ds anyway. Now clearly you don't need a high end mobo to run a stock 1333FSB C2D... for the same reason you also don't need a high end mobo to run a 800FSB E21x0 or E4x00 chip @ 1333FSB.


Message edited by epsilon84 on 03-24-2008 at 10:07:26 PM
pat
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

so you only need more expensive memory

pat
Profile: Forum Veteran
More Information

epsilon84 wrote :

The E4500 doesn't require 'expensive cooling' to OC either, it actually runs cooler than the X2 5000+ BE. My E4400 does 3.33GHz on the stock HSF, and guess what, its FREE.  :whistle:  
 
RAM is so cheap nowadays I doubt the OP is getting less than the standard 2GB kit, so your argument is moot unless you are suggesting the OP get 4GB of RAM for a budget build. ;)


 
 
That's the point. I put 4 gigs with Vista now. I mostly built budget machine. And for the difference that cpu gives in budget machine, I always favor RAM and HDD space than CPU.
 
And to be honest, in all of my build, based on Intel or AMD, the only difference in speed that could be noticed on a day to day basis come from more ram, or faster hdd than a few hundred of MHz.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

pat wrote :

so you only need more expensive memory

 

No you don't, a 1333FSB only needs DDR2-667 when using the 1:1 ratio.  :ange:

 

Mate, admit it, you've clearly never overclocked a C2D before, have you?  :lol:

 

I wonder what excuse you're gonna come up with next, I think you're running out man... mobo/FSB/RAM all mythbusted. ;)

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by epsilon84 on 03-25-2008 at 12:34:03 AM
Profile: nimble knuckle