Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Nvidia » Is this a good vid card?
 

Is this a good vid card?

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Is this a good vid card?
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Hi Everyone,
 
I was going to buy a 8800GT for $249CAD when I found this card:
 
BFG GeForce 8800 GTS OC nVidia GeForce 8800GTS Chipset (550MHz) Shader Clock (1300MHz) 640MB (1.6GHz) PCI-Express Graphic Card 96 Stream Processor Shader Model 4.0 2x Dual-Link DVI-I HDTV TV-Out Support HDCP DirectX 10 SLI-Ready Built for Windows Vista
 
http://canadacomputers.com/index.p [...] 99.243.390
 
Do you think it is a good buy or am I safer to go with the 8800GT seen here?
http://canadacomputers.com/index.p [...] 99.243.390
 
 
Thanks,
D

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

The G92 8800GT is a better card IMO. You may want to try and find one with an improved dual slot cooler since the GT runs a little warm. This would also be a good option: http://www.tigerdirect.com/applica [...] CatId=1826


---------------
Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

 

Profile: journeyman
More Information

fantastic advice!  thank you.  
The card I referenced above is 640MB but the one you reffered me to is 512MB ... could you please advise why you chose a card with less ram?
 
Is the 8800GTS a worse performing card compared to the 8800GT?


Message edited by ddasilva on 03-09-2008 at 07:54:18 PM
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

The G92 architecture is superior to the G80 used in the 640mb version. Yes, the 8800GT is a superior card to the GTS 640. The GTS 512mb is a better card than both the 640 and the GT. Sorry should have posted a link supporting that.
 
GT vs GTS 640 (both in blue):
http://www23.tomshardware.com/grap [...] &chart=318
 
review of GT vs GTS 512:
http://www.tweaktown.com/articles/ [...] index.html


---------------
Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

 

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Why do we use the slower clocked C2Ds instead of the faster clocked 9xx Pentium series?  You CAN NOT look at only one part of a device and decide how it would perform.  Just because X has more of Z then Y does, doesn't mean its going to perform better.  
 
Why has the meghertz myth only been broken for CPUs?  Why do people think that because X video card has more memory, it must be faster?  Or X CPU has more L2 cache, it must be faster?  Why do people believe that the raptor is faster just because it spins at 10,000RPMs?  Or that its slower because it uses SATA instead of SATA300/SATA2?  It seems that most people have figured out that CPU frequency isn't everything, but it also seems to stop there.  Folks, the same reasons apply to everything else.  Sure, the 8800GT has less ram.  But for the card you linked, it also has more shaders, allowing it to do more work.[/rant]


---------------
The voice of REASON
Do NOT feed the TROLLS!
Always a DEMON!
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Thank you for your thoughts.  I am very surprised to see the new GTS is not as good as its predessor the GT.  Could someone advise why the GTS is not a great performer like the GT?

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

I see whats going on here. You got your cards mixed up. The 8800GTS 640mb is the original GTS. The 8800GT and GTS 512mb are newer cards that use a new core (G92 compared to G80) and also have more stream processors. As 4745454b stated, memory isn't everything any more than clock speeds are.

 

The new performance scheme looks like this:
8800GTS 320 (G80)< 8800GTS 640(G80)< 8800GT 512(G92) < 8800GTS 512 (G92)


Message edited by lostandwan dering on 03-09-2008 at 08:17:40 PM

---------------
Sager NP5760|T7200|2gb DDR2-667| 100gb 7200rpm HDD| 512mb 7950GTX|17'' WUXGA

 

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Thanks for clarifying.  The 8800GTS 512mb is a better card stock compared to the 8800GT 512mb, however, the 800GT is better performing than the GTS.
 
Could you please advise why someone would rather go to the 8800GTS over the 8800GT?

Profile: addict
More Information

it's faster... lol
 
and those old cards (8800GTS 320/640) are being phased out, not sure if they are even making them anymore

What became of subtlety?
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

ddasilva wrote :

Thanks for clarifying.  The 8800GTS 512mb is a better card stock compared to the 8800GT 512mb, however, the 800GT is better performing than the GTS.
 
Could you please advise why someone would rather go to the 8800GTS over the 8800GT?


 
You're still confusing the OLD 8800GTS 640MB with the NEW 8800GTS 512MB.
 
The 8800GTS 640MB has the OLD core (G80)
 
The 8800GTS 512MB has the NEW core (G92)
 
 
The NEW 8800GTS 512MB will outperform the NEW 8800GT 512MB, which in turn will outperform the OLD 8800GTS 640MB.
 
Hope this clarifies things.


Message edited by mtyermom on 03-09-2008 at 09:27:59 PM
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

The 8800GTS 320 and 640 came first, aka g80, then came the 8800GT 512 and then the 8800GTS512 aka g92. The g80 (8800GTS 320/640) are older, and inferior products. Its confusing, blame nVidia for that


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: old hand
More Information

Wow, nVidia really needs to revise their naming scheme.  If the site lists specs, make sure it says G92 or 65nm to ensure it is the faster card.
 
Ram in video cards is second to the chip.  Card makers love to put lots of ram in bad cards just to try to make them look better.


---------------
Gaming: FX-60 @ 2.81GHz (x14, 1.375, 90nm) > A8N-SLI Deluxe > Asus 4850 - 625/1986 > 2GB Corsair XMS 400MHz  
2-3-3-6-1T
HTPC/Light Gaming: X2 5400+ 2.8GHz Brisbane > Gigabyte 780G MATX - 900MHz Core > 2GB Corsair XMS2 800MHz  
4-4-4-12-2T
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Thanks for your post everyone.  I was originally going to purchase a 8800GT, however, it sounds like a 8800GTS is the way to go.  Is there another card I should consider?

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Only the GTX or the ATI 3870x2 is better, as long as were talking 8800GTS 512 G92


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Yes- we are talking about the GTS 512 G92.  

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

I think youll like it alot, just remember to make sure your power supply is good enough, and watch those temps


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Lost- thank you for referring me to the following card:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applica [...] CatId=1826
 
The two retailers I've seen is selling the 8800GT for more than the above 8800GTS.  Is it safe to assume the card in the link above is G92?


Message edited by ddasilva on 03-09-2008 at 10:40:58 PM
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Your link doesnt work


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Fixed.  Thanks for advising me

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Great card , good price


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

ddasilva wrote :

Thanks for your post everyone.  I was originally going to purchase a 8800GT, however, it sounds like a 8800GTS is the way to go.  Is there another card I should consider?


I hope you're talking about the 512MB 8800GTS. You make it sound like you are going to buy the 640MB GTS that you listed in the OP, which as many have pointed out here would be a mistake.

<