...and first I got to say, it was so pleasant and wierd.
Two rings in I got someone at G.SKILL and they answered every question! No phone menus, etc. I never heard of this company but the reviews some of their products got seems great such as:
Yes, he is right. More stable with 2 rather than 4 sticks. More overclockable.
If you are using a 32-bit system you will only see~3.2GB. If using a 64-bit system you will see all the memory.
------------------------------Google is your friend and Bob's your uncle
Reply to evongugg
Actually I realize I left a key point out. The G.Skill guy told me there is no performance or stability issue with 4 sticks vs. 2 which went against some of what I was reading.
He seemed nice and honest though but maybe says that because they obviously sell both configurations...
What I mean is, when speaking about overclocking, the least amount of parameters/instances of things to overclock, the higher your chances of getting big results.
Getting 4 modules (or even Cores if you prefer) to overclock by 25% and being stable is harder than getting 2 modules/cores to overclock by 25%. If just a single module/core is of bad quality, then the rest can't go higher than it.
So, multiple points of failure is the only reason I'd go 2x2GB, if I didn't care about OC whatsoever, I wouldn't be afraid of going 4x1GB from a quality RAM manufacturer.
doesn't it also have something to do with the mobo trying to supply power to 4 modules instead of 2? i think i read that somewhere.
------------------------------They call me crazy for yelling, alone in my room, at the computer screen. They just don\\\\\\\'t understand the game.
Reply to jeremyrailton
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.