its not much, its an AMD 64 X2 4600+ windsor. My motherboard is a MSI K9N-Neo-F V3 and only supports Hypertransport 1.0 and 2.0, not 3.0.
It can take a Phenom processor, but without Hypertransport 3 how much will it be gimped?
This PC is specifically for gaming and right now I dont want to fork out the cash for a serious upgrade, just something to get me by for the next year or so.
Im looking at two options:
Phenom 9650+
Athlon 64 X2 6400+
the money I'll save by going with the X2 is minimal compared to the Phenom 9650. I just want to know what makes the most sense for my motherboard and if the Phenom would a be a waste of money (performance difference negated by hypertransport)
Im not too familiar with how the quad cores work with games, but judging by frequency alone it seems the X2 may have some advantage in just games being a ghz faster than the Phenom.
Well, I think this is more of a quad vs. duals decision. How does your computer run? Is it fairly clean (processes wise)? Do you run stuff in the background? Is this only a gaming computer? In MOST games the 6400+ will beat the Phenom. Very few games are optimized for >2 cores.
------------------------------Phenom II X4 940 BE 3.0GHz - 1.25V > GA-MA790GP-DS4H > XFX ATI 4850 1GB > 4GB OCZ Platinum 1066MHz 5-5-5-15-2T > PCP&C 610W
Athlon II X2 250 3.0GHz > GA-MA770T-UD3P > Sapphire ATI 4650 512MB DDR3 > 4GB OCZ Platinum 1600MHz@1066MHz > XP/Win7 Enter 64
Reply to EXT64
I upgraded from 2,5ghz opteron dual core, 2gb 500mhz ram, into 3ghz amd black ed, 2gb 667mhz ram.
Difference in performance in games is tremendous.. Don't underestimate the cpu upgrade
Im looking at two options:
Phenom 9650+
Athlon 64 X2 6400+
the money I'll save by going with the X2 is minimal compared to the Phenom 9650. I just want to know what makes the most sense for my motherboard and if the Phenom would a be a waste of money (performance difference negated by hypertransport)
Im not too familiar with how the quad cores work with games, but judging by frequency alone it seems the X2 may have some advantage in just games being a ghz faster than the Phenom.
thoughts?
The quad core has longer shelf life because more games are arriving that support 2+ cores. Supreme Commander and Lost Planet seem to do well with quads. I don't think that you'll do badly with a Phenom on an AM2 board. If you decide on a new board, you can't go wrong with a 780G; and that should position you for Deneb in December or thereabouts.
------------------------------Phenom 8750, ASUS M3A78T
4 gigs Kingston DDR2 800 two 1T SAMSUNG HD103UI
Sapphire 4870x2, Sony BDU-X10S BD-ROM
Antec Neo 650 PSU Antec Nine Hundred, Acer H213H 1080p LCD
Reply to yipsl
Hmm, with the increased overclocking headroom from B3, I'll be leaning towards the Phenom 9650 at this point. You should be able to overclock it to around 2.7 - 2.8GHz, at which point it would be a good match for an X2 6400+ even in single/dual threaded performance, and it'll totally blow the X2 away in multithreaded performance.
I wouldn't worry about lack of HT3 support, a single Phenom doesn't even come close to saturating the HT2 bus. HT3 is only useful for multi CPU server setups, for desktops HT2 is more than enough.
Message edited by epsilon84 on 03-29-2008 at 01:51:11 PM
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.