Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > help with q6600

help with q6600

Forum Overclocking : CPUs - help with q6600

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

hi im testing my q6600 at 3.6ghz (9x400) and prime gave me an error after just 11 min.
the weird thing is it did not shut the computer down, it just gave an error and 2 of the cores stopped testing.
does anybody know what this is?
my voltages are:

Vcore: 1.45v
CPU VTT: 1.47v
NB Core: 1.33v (i think this might not be enough and ocld be the cause of the problem but i dont know)
RAM: 2.05v

my temps are kinda high but i guess that because of the high voltage they are in the low 60's under prime load...

thanks in advance...

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Just a wild guess... but how about it means the oc is not stable. :sarcastic:

Reply to orangegator

yeah i know... what i dont know is why not? which of my voltages look wrong?

Reply to Nica Guy

Nica Guy wrote :

yeah i know... what i dont know is why not? which of my voltages look wrong?



Well, 3.6Ghz is a fairly high overclock for a Q6600 on air. You may not get it stable. You probably need to increase both the NB voltage and cpu Vcore. Try just the nb first. I don't know exactly what vtt does. The ram should be set to whatever the manufacturer's spec says. But to get this stable, you'll need good cooling. And since you are already in the 60's I doubt you will.

Reply to orangegator

i got 61 degress maximum with my xigmatek 1283 i dont think thats too much...
yeah i was thinking about raising the nb voltage bc if my vcore wasnt enough it would shut down instead of getting an error when stress testing...
do u have any idea how much should i raise my nb's voltage?

Reply to Nica Guy
- 0 +

One notch at a time is usually best.

------------------------------ http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3261/2577559697_bdb9aec12f_o.png
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/2577559521_edb3ac038e_o.png
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/679275.png
Reply to Lucuis

Nica Guy wrote :

hi im testing my q6600 at 3.6ghz (9x400) and prime gave me an error after just 11 min.
the weird thing is it did not shut the computer down, it just gave an error and 2 of the cores stopped testing.
does anybody know what this is?
my voltages are:

Vcore: 1.45v
CPU VTT: 1.47v
NB Core: 1.33v (i think this might not be enough and ocld be the cause of the problem but i dont know)
RAM: 2.05v

my temps are kinda high but i guess that because of the high voltage they are in the low 60's under prime load...

thanks in advance...



you didnt just set it to 3.6 to start with did you? :ange:

------------------------------ Q6600@3510/1560 + TT BigTyphoon+Mod
8gb Kingston 800mhz
Gigabyte EP35-DS3P
XFX 8800GT/512
Reply to apache_lives

Raise your core voltage a bit more. The voltage requirement goes up exponentially as you increase your frequency; I need 1.29 to get 3.2, so 3.6 will probably take something over 1.5v.

Although I can't see WHY you would need 3.6...

------------------------------ Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 @ 3.06 GHz/1.275v - Zalman CNPS8700LED - Gigabyte GA-G31M-S2L - 4 GB A-Data DDR2 800 @ 850 MHz/5-5-5-15 - XFX Core Edition GTS 250 1GB @ 738/1836/1100 - Seagate 250 GB 7200.10 hdd - Silverstone ST400 - Vista Ult. x64
Reply to Cpt Deadboots

apache_lives wrote :

you didnt just set it to 3.6 to start with did you? :ange:



from the way his post was written, i would say that he did.

@nice guy u have to start smaller than 400x9. try maybe 333x9 or even 300x9 which will give u 3.0 ghz and 2.7 ghz, respectively. i had my q6600 stable at 300x9 with only 1.237 vcore and 333x9 with 1.281 vcore. i havent even tried 400x9 myself yet..

------------------------------ http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/430630.png
Asus P5Q Deluxe,
Q6600 @ 3.0 ghz (333x9),
EVGA 8800GTS 320MB stock,
Reply to aeiouandxyz

i did go step by step 3.0, 3.2 3.4 3.6 all very stable ecept for the last one... i tested on 3.4 for 9 hours stable so please dont make stpid asumptions...

Reply to Nica Guy

Nica Guy wrote :

i did go step by step 3.0, 3.2 3.4 3.6 all very stable ecept for the last one... i tested on 3.4 for 9 hours stable so please dont make stpid asumptions...



then why ask a "stupid" question to start with?

you want help? then take the questions and answers as advice and thank us that we helped you, not shovel those words back at us.

:non:

------------------------------ Q6600@3510/1560 + TT BigTyphoon+Mod
8gb Kingston 800mhz
Gigabyte EP35-DS3P
XFX 8800GT/512
Reply to apache_lives

thanks apache :D

------------------------------ http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/430630.png
Asus P5Q Deluxe,
Q6600 @ 3.0 ghz (333x9),
EVGA 8800GTS 320MB stock,
Reply to aeiouandxyz
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Overclocking > CPUs > help with q6600
Go to:

There are 1172 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them