Ad
News

Crucial spices up Ballistix gamer memory

Published on October 23, 2006

Crucial has updated its Ballistix and Ballistics Tracer memory modules. Read more

Bling, Bling: Crucial lights up its memory

Published on November 30, 2004

Matching the Christmas decoration in of your house, performance memory manufacturer Crucial added holiday lighting to its memory. The Ballistic Tracer model line displays "activity-indicating" LEDs and "blue ground effects LEDs". Read more

Crucial takes Ballistix memory to 1 GHz

Published on August 02, 2005

Crucial today introduced a 1 GHz version of its performance memory series Ballistix. Read more

Crucial DDR3 Memory — Now With More Bling!

Published on October 08, 2008

Just in case the whir of fans and the occasional tick-tick of a hard drive doesn’t provide enough clues that that yes, your PC really is powered on, Lexar Media is now offering its LED-laden Crucial Ballistix Tracer SDRAM in DDR3 trim. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Core i7: 4-Way CrossFire, 3-way SLI, Paradise?

Published on November 04, 2008

For the first time ever, gamers are being treated to a reasonably priced platform enabling the best that AMD and Nvidia have to offer. Is Core i7 a gamer’s nirvana or does the processor serve up more of the same? Read more

Editor's Corner: Overclocking Core i7

Published on November 04, 2008

After discovering Intel's Overspeed Protection in yesterday's first-look at Core i7's performance, we're back to set the record straight on the overclocking headroom of the flagship 965 Extreme and entry-level Core i7 920. Read more

Intel's Core i7: Blazing Fast, But Crippled O/C

Published on November 03, 2008

Core i7--previously referred to as Nehalem--requires new motherboards, coolers and memory. Its performance is compelling and means AMD is falling behind even further, but Intel is putting in some speed bumps that will impact overclocking enthusiasts. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on October 31, 2008

Three dramatically different builds face off in a show of performance, defining the real value of each. Our mainstream system is designed to meet the needs of most users. Who should spend more and who can live with less? Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Motherboards & Memory » Memory » Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4GB or Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2GB
 

Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4GB or Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2GB




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4GB or Crucial Ballistix Tracer 2GB
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

The egg is stocking the Crucial Ballistix Tracer 4GB (2 x 2GB) for a limited time only for about $150. Debating between that or the 2gb Tracer with LEDS. Any opinions??

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6820148180


---------------
Thermaltake Lanbox | The only Sli 939 mATX board by eVGA | AMD 2.4ghz X2 | OCZ DDR 400 RAM [2-3-2-5] | 2- 150gb RaptorX & 2- 320 GB [e.sata] | nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS v.ACS [320mb] | SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

I will always go with more RAM than flash myself. Get the 4GB.


Message edited by runswindows95 on 04-24-2008 at 03:18:26 PM
Plays with his WEI
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

LED's!?!?


Dude - 4GB. Period. End Discussion.


---------------
The more I read the forums, the more I feel that a number of individuals would be well served by skipping their next GPU purchase in favor of a little "Stress relief" from the local 'Working Girls'"
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Go with Crucial if you are an overclocker. You can find other brands price cheaper.
Go with 2x2GB if you are running Vmware, video editing or something like that. For normal uses 2x1GB is enough.


---------------
Scruze my English!
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I will add that I am running Windows Xp. Even though it will only recognize 3.2gb ram, does it matter if you have 2-2gb sticks or 2-1gb sets & 2-512mb sets (as it relate to performance & dual channel)???


Message edited by mychael616 on 04-24-2008 at 06:14:46 PM
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Better performance with 2x2GB versus 4 sticks.


---------------
Scruze my English!
Profile: newbie
More Information

it will notice 4 gb - your video memory. if your video memory is 512 mb it will notice 3.5gb of ram.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Where do I go to make it recognize 3.5 gb. AND what can I do to recognize all 4gb?

Plays with his WEI
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

mychael616 wrote :

Where do I go to make it recognize 3.5 gb. AND what can I do to recognize all 4gb?



You need:

1. A memory controller which supports memory swap functionality. The latest chipsets like Intel 975X, 955X, Nvidia NF4 SLI Intel Edition, Nvidia NF4 SLI X16, AMD K8 and newer architectures can support the memory swap function.

2. Installation of Windows XP Pro X64, Windows Vista 64, or other OS which can provide more than 4GB worth of address space. (Read: 64 Bit operating system)


Message edited by Scotteq on 04-25-2008 at 10:14:20 PM

---------------
The more I read the forums, the more I feel that a number of individuals would be well served by skipping their next GPU purchase in favor of a little "Stress relief" from the local 'Working Girls'"
Profile: journeyman
More Information

---------------
Thermaltake Lanbox | The only Sli 939 mATX board by eVGA | AMD 2.4ghz X2 | OCZ DDR 400 RAM [2-3-2-5] | 2- 150gb RaptorX & 2- 320 GB [e.sata] | nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS v.ACS [320mb] | SB Audigy 2 ZS Audio
Profile: addict
More Information

Don't see why not, I've got an older P965 board and am running 4 sticks of 1 gigs. This is on a dual boot Xp Pro 32 bit / Vista 32 bit Business. Currently in XP and showing 3.40 available for program use. Don't need, nor plan on going the 64 bit route.

Added - If you look at specs, the board supports up to 8 Gigs of RAM


Message edited by RetiredChief on 04-26-2008 at 05:40:00 AM
Plays with his WEI
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information




If you can accept that your computer won't address all of the RAM (you have a 32 bit OS), then that board will work fine. If you must show/use all 4GB, then you need to change to a 64 bit OS.


---------------
The more I read the forums, the more I feel that a number of individuals would be well served by skipping their next GPU purchase in favor of a little "Stress relief" from the local 'Working Girls'"
Profile: addict
More Information

Scotteq - Not True, Computer will see all 4 gigs, AND a 32 bit operating system WILL address ALL 4 gigs, it is just that only 3.2 give or take .2 will be availible for program usage.

Please read:
www.dansdata.com/askdan00015.htm
support.microsoft.com/kb/929605

In General.
The MIMO's remapped to the top of the four gogs MAY (Do not know) resulat in a small performance boast. Programs/operating systems have to access this code NO MATTER where it resides. With less than 4 gigs, where does this code reside, in BIOS, or in swap file. A "Call" to bios or swap file would be slower than if in memory (ie Memory that was remapped to HiMem in the OLD Dos days - 604K -> 1 Meg).

Next question, Is there a peformance booast goning from a 4 gig 32 bit system to a 4 gig 64 Bit system, I think not. The real advantage of the 64 bit operating system is when MORE than 4 gigs is used, and then it is program specific.

THIS IS NOT a slam againts 64 bit OP systems. They have there place, and eventially majority will migrate there. However, Advocates should also admit it is not "the greatest thing since sliced bread" for every one. I for one (I'm the exception) would have to fork out about 2 grand to update Pre-XP orcad and another program - and this is not worth it.

I'm bad, I'm nationwide
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Go w/ 2x2GB

The question really is red vs black tracers

Black doesn't have the 'ground effects" and has green LEDs, but can be found for $40-50 cheaper.


---------------
Take what man makes and use it,
But do not worship it,
For it shall pass.
Plays with his WEI
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information
n°1767615
04-28-2008 at 06:46:17 PM