(@ jitpublisher ) Sorry you took offense, it was not my intention. I quoted the part of your post I was commenting about....Basically the first line. I was not trying to take away from your post in anyway, nor even sticking to exactly what your point may have been in making it, I was simply adding my own comment to that part of it. Think of it as an additional opinion /comment not a correction. I in no way fault the recommendation of the e8400 for gaming. I only fault paying what most sites are asking for it, which is another topic.
All I was commenting on, is apart from 3dmarks or low res scaling benchmarks, will an e8400 really provide a better gaming experience right now? Or tweaked to play not bench, will things be GPU limited and perform the same? It's not like comparing an 8800GTS 640MB to an 8800 GTX in what the gamer will get from it. That makes a playable difference. But to me an e8400 won't make a playable difference, so while it leads the charts maybe, it doesn't really equate to a better gaming experience. I personally think the Q6600 is plenty/excellent for games, and yes I do consider OC'in as a possibility when I say that.
Believe me, I don't feel the need to justify my own rig to anyone, that has nothing to do with it. I more want to justify the Q6600 for this guy if that is where his heart leads him. There was no e8400 when I bought, if there had been I may have decided on one, but it would depend on prices. My options were e6750, e6850 or Q6600, whith the latter two costing the same. I'll probably own an e8400 when prices drop. Anyway, I just can't fault someone for choosing a Q6600 for gaming, especially given high e8400 markups. It's excellent now for games and may just prove to be far better than the e8400 someday. Neither will be great then I agree, but, Like I said above, the FX-55 beat the X2 4800+ at release too in most games, but who would rather have the X2 4800+ or even 4200+ now verses a killer single core? They weren't priced the same when I bought, the FX-55 was alot cheaper. But the X2 would have lasted longer for sure. I would not bet on it, but also don't doubt that the Q6600 will last longer too compared to the e8400, in at least a few games. I don't see either as a bad option, just like the Q6600 if priced the same even for the gamer. And I don't see the Q6600 hurting someones gaming experience compared to an e8400.
I'm all for the e8400, and think it's probably the best reasonably priced gaming CPU. I am just not happy my $200 on e remained out of stock and now they want alot for them.
I just don't see an out of stock e8400 being more valuable to the gamer now for games (not benchies) than the instock Q6600 priced the same. If it saved the gamer money, payed for a game, payed for a better video card....then for sure go for it. But do think it's possible the Q6600 could prove to be more valuable someday.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115017
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115037