Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Itels New 2 Billion Transistor CPU with 30MB of cache !
 

Itels New 2 Billion Transistor CPU with 30MB of cache !

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Itels New 2 Billion Transistor CPU with 30MB of cache !
 
Go to www.hartsbatteries.com
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/0 [...] om_at_idf/
 

Quote :

Gelsinger did show off Intel's upcoming Tukwila processor which is a monster 2-billion transistor quad-core chip with 30 megabytes of cache. Due to ship in late 2008, the Tukwila will have dual integrated memory controllers and Quickpath interconnects something which Intel says is faster than AMD's HyerTransport technology. The silicon seems to be progressing as the world's first demo of a Tukwila server running RedHat 5.1 was shown to the public.


 
 
Sorry if someone already posted about this, but does anyone know anymore about this?
 
Whats up with this ?
 

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

It's just intel's new itanium chip...
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tukwila_(processor)

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Basically according to Intel its a giant can of whoop ass.
 
I can't wait to see though cuz if it is it will be interesting to see how fast AMD gets something out to compete with it.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

The two billion transistor count is a bit misleading if you're looking at that as a way of measuring its processing power since most of those transistors are probably part of that massive chunk of cache in the thing.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

rodney_ws wrote :

The two billion transistor count is a bit misleading if you're looking at that as a way of measuring its processing power since most of those transistors are probably part of that massive chunk of cache in the thing.


 
Well the reference to giant was due to size but if what Intel states is true it will be a can of whoop ass. I need to find the details but I read a report on their quickpath and the bandwidth available to it. It was insane.
 
But as I said I can't wait to see it in action just to see AMD's response.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Go to www.hartsbatteries.com
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

How does this compare to Nahelem ? How much cache will it have. I know desktops and server cpu's differer , just wondering.

Yup, you got it buddy
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

From what I remember when Intel compared QPI to Hypertransport, they were comparing it to HT2.0.  Just means AMD will need to release chips that run HT3.0 at full speed, and probably need to come out with a faster version for AM3.


---------------
AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition, ZeroTherm Nirvana 120 Premium CPU Cooler, MSI K9a2 Platinum bios 1.1b3 or P.0J, 4GB (2x2) Mushkin DDR2 1066 (pc8500) 5-5-5-15 2.05v RAM, Sapphire Toxic HD3870, Raidmax RX-700SS PSU, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320gb SATA2 X
Go to www.hartsbatteries.com
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Well. My transmission going out in my car will force me to wait until Helmmie comes out.. So then I can render my standard def videos faster than real time! If I had one of the current quads I probably could ?
 
I read a post about Nahelem earlier and someone had cpuz pics I think it showed cache. That could have been a fake though.

Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

rodney_ws wrote :

The two billion transistor count is a bit misleading if you're looking at that as a way of measuring its processing power since most of those transistors are probably part of that massive chunk of cache in the thing.


 
This is pretty much true.
 

Quote :

It operates at 2GHz and uses a large number of transistors for memory. It also contains lot of onboard memory and registers.


 
http://i44.photobucket.com/albums/f16/Luminaris/intel_turkwila-thumb-450x300.jpg
 
This is still a good step in the right direction IMO for Intel.  
 


---------------
Teamwork involves embracing all ideas whether good or bad
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

I forget what exactly I read and where... but it said something to the effect of in 1950 there were 500 million transistors in the WORLD.  
 
Now we're packing 4 times that amount into one CPU. Pretty amazing times we live in.

Other Forum Pr!ck
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

It's mostly cache .. so the huge transistor count isn't a great leap forward in technology.
 
The design is old hat.
 
It's a clinker.
 
When software engineering (if ever) catches up and we actually have decent multithreaded code running ...
 
Alas ... the world doesn't seem to have enough smart people employed in the area.
 
Maybe we need to market programming as the profession for the world's smartest people ...
 
After all ... the hardware can't do much without them.
 
 
:)


---------------
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
 
Flood attempt detected. You cannot post this message.
 
Profile: member
More Information

rodney_ws wrote :

I forget what exactly I read and where... but it said something to the effect of in 1950 there were 500 million transistors in the WORLD.  
 
Now we're packing 4 times that amount into one CPU. Pretty amazing times we live in.


 
Yeah, I think those were contact transistors which basically were a germanium rock with wires soldered to it :)  I'd like to see Intel put 2 billion of those puppies in a building, let alone a chip.

www.portfolio.j-henderson.co.uk
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

^^
 
lets see you try and program for multi thread, its more of a limitation of the language than the programmer tbh...  ive got some training in Multi-threaded Java programming, but i hate the language. prefer C+.

Play that funky music, white boy!
Profile: addict
More Information

Yeh the Itanium2 is crazy nuts. I think several hundred are used in one of NASA's supercomputer....


---------------
Athlon 6000+, GeForce 6600 256mb, GeIL 2GBs D/C DDR2 800 @ 4-4-4-12, MSI K9N Ultra nForce 570,250Gb,Sony 17" SXGA, X-550 5.1
Profile: Forum Master
More Information

Ah yes, Itanium.
They are also known as "the money pit", and Itanic.
Intel has spent about $100billion on that puppy over the last ten years.
Since it first went on sale about 6 years ago, they have sold thousands.
 It is intended as an HPC server chip. Problem is, it's more efficient to go with multiple clusters, with IBM, opteron, and even xeon chips.
I'm sure that AMD will be happy to see Intel waste more $ and research on it.

Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

endyen wrote :

Ah yes, Itanium.
They are also known as "the money pit", and Itanic.
Intel has spent about $100billion on that puppy over the last ten years.
Since it first went on sale about 6 years ago, they have sold thousands.
 It is intended as an HPC server chip. Problem is, it's more efficient to go with multiple clusters, with IBM, opteron, and even xeon chips.
I'm sure that AMD will be happy to see Intel waste more $ and research on it.


 
IDK. That may change with this chip. If it performs better tand cost less than a certain amount of clusters then it would be to the benefit of the buyer.
 
I of course think that tera-scale would be better but hey I don't control them.


---------------
http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/banner/381014.png
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

fazers_on_stun wrote :

Yeah, I think those were contact transistors which basically were a germanium rock with wires soldered to it :)  I'd like to see Intel put 2 billion of those puppies in a building, let alone a chip.


 
Oh come on... I wasn't implying they were same size of transistor.

Other Forum Pr!ck
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

The iceberg hit it so many times and it refuses to sink ... so ... ???
 
Intel probably use the entire project as a means to avoid paying tax.
 
That is possibly the entire reason for it's existence.
 
On that basis alone it could be a fantastic success !!
 
I actually have seem an Itanium ... so they do exist.
 
A guy was walking out of a shop with one ... in a wheelbarrow. Two mad scientists with bald heads and facial ticks were at his side ... whispering some very long sentences in his ears.
 
He was unable to comprehend.


---------------
Great spirits have always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds.
 
Flood attempt detected. You cannot post this message.
 
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information