Gelsinger did show off Intel's upcoming Tukwila processor which is a monster 2-billion transistor quad-core chip with 30 megabytes of cache. Due to ship in late 2008, the Tukwila will have dual integrated memory controllers and Quickpath interconnects something which Intel says is faster than AMD's HyerTransport technology. The silicon seems to be progressing as the world's first demo of a Tukwila server running RedHat 5.1 was shown to the public.
Sorry if someone already posted about this, but does anyone know anymore about this?
The two billion transistor count is a bit misleading if you're looking at that as a way of measuring its processing power since most of those transistors are probably part of that massive chunk of cache in the thing.
The two billion transistor count is a bit misleading if you're looking at that as a way of measuring its processing power since most of those transistors are probably part of that massive chunk of cache in the thing.
Well the reference to giant was due to size but if what Intel states is true it will be a can of whoop ass. I need to find the details but I read a report on their quickpath and the bandwidth available to it. It was insane.
But as I said I can't wait to see it in action just to see AMD's response.
From what I remember when Intel compared QPI to Hypertransport, they were comparing it to HT2.0. Just means AMD will need to release chips that run HT3.0 at full speed, and probably need to come out with a faster version for AM3.
---------------
AMD Phenom X4 9850 Black Edition, ZeroTherm Nirvana 120 Premium CPU Cooler, MSI K9a2 Platinum bios 1.1b3 or P.0J, 4GB (2x2) Mushkin DDR2 1066 (pc8500) 5-5-5-15 2.05v RAM, Sapphire Toxic HD3870, Raidmax RX-700SS PSU, Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320gb SATA2 X
Well. My transmission going out in my car will force me to wait until Helmmie comes out.. So then I can render my standard def videos faster than real time! If I had one of the current quads I probably could ?
I read a post about Nahelem earlier and someone had cpuz pics I think it showed cache. That could have been a fake though.
The two billion transistor count is a bit misleading if you're looking at that as a way of measuring its processing power since most of those transistors are probably part of that massive chunk of cache in the thing.
This is pretty much true.
Quote :
It operates at 2GHz and uses a large number of transistors for memory. It also contains lot of onboard memory and registers.
This is still a good step in the right direction IMO for Intel.
---------------
Teamwork involves embracing all ideas whether good or bad
I forget what exactly I read and where... but it said something to the effect of in 1950 there were 500 million transistors in the WORLD.
Now we're packing 4 times that amount into one CPU. Pretty amazing times we live in.
Yeah, I think those were contact transistors which basically were a germanium rock with wires soldered to it I'd like to see Intel put 2 billion of those puppies in a building, let alone a chip.
lets see you try and program for multi thread, its more of a limitation of the language than the programmer tbh... ive got some training in Multi-threaded Java programming, but i hate the language. prefer C+.
Ah yes, Itanium.
They are also known as "the money pit", and Itanic.
Intel has spent about $100billion on that puppy over the last ten years.
Since it first went on sale about 6 years ago, they have sold thousands.
It is intended as an HPC server chip. Problem is, it's more efficient to go with multiple clusters, with IBM, opteron, and even xeon chips.
I'm sure that AMD will be happy to see Intel waste more $ and research on it.
Ah yes, Itanium.
They are also known as "the money pit", and Itanic.
Intel has spent about $100billion on that puppy over the last ten years.
Since it first went on sale about 6 years ago, they have sold thousands.
It is intended as an HPC server chip. Problem is, it's more efficient to go with multiple clusters, with IBM, opteron, and even xeon chips.
I'm sure that AMD will be happy to see Intel waste more $ and research on it.
IDK. That may change with this chip. If it performs better tand cost less than a certain amount of clusters then it would be to the benefit of the buyer.
I of course think that tera-scale would be better but hey I don't control them.
Yeah, I think those were contact transistors which basically were a germanium rock with wires soldered to it I'd like to see Intel put 2 billion of those puppies in a building, let alone a chip.
Oh come on... I wasn't implying they were same size of transistor.
The iceberg hit it so many times and it refuses to sink ... so ... ???
Intel probably use the entire project as a means to avoid paying tax.
That is possibly the entire reason for it's existence.
On that basis alone it could be a fantastic success !!
I actually have seem an Itanium ... so they do exist.
A guy was walking out of a shop with one ... in a wheelbarrow. Two mad scientists with bald heads and facial ticks were at his side ... whispering some very long sentences in his ears.