Beaver_2

Distinguished
Aug 14, 2007
21
0
18,510
It's about time. I wonder if they overclock any better than the B2s.
199.99 isn't bad for a quad core processor.
 

Grimmy

Splendid
Feb 20, 2006
4,431
0
22,780
Pros: AMD finally fixed it.
Cons: Should've gotten here sooner. And I want one.
Other Thoughts: How well will sales of this CPU take off? I'm sure that the 9850BE will make a killing.

0 out of 6 people found this review helpful. Did you?

:lol:. o O (funny how I find it helpful to know 6 people didn't find it helpful)
 

mtyermom

Distinguished
Jun 1, 2007
956
0
18,980


How ironic this is for you to be talking smack after all those copy and paste amd fanboy build posts you made.



Jet Propulsion Laboratory
 

Space_Monkey

Distinguished
Feb 14, 2008
17
0
18,510
I rly wish AMD would step up their game here. hell i had to switch to intel for a decent quad core :( . This new B3 stepping or revision or w.e it is doesn't seem like the step they need to take. The need a complete revision of their chips, and they need to not put out faulty hardware just to have a quadcore on the market. If i knew that i could get a real, nice, o/c able, and competent quad core from AMD, i would be willing to wait a year and pay 500 for it. forget this half-assed stuff they are pulling. i want a real chip :pfff: