Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
 

Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
 Page :   1  2  3
Previous 
Author
 Thread : Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX Review
 
muk
Profile: member
More Information

The 9800 GTX is not a revolutionarily new card. We look at the card's design and test it against a strong set of competitors. How well does its performance match up with its name?
 
http://www.tomshardware.com/2008/0 [...] index.html

Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: member
More Information

I'm glad tom's reviewed the gtx against a variety of cards, instead of the shameful lack of this in the gx2 review!

Profile: stranger
More Information

Man, this is even more disappointing than I had feared it would be, I'd hoped it would at least top the 8800 ultra by a few % but not even being able to do that (I'll be getting a 1920x1200 monitor) has significantly reduced my will to get a new PC at all :(, and I was so excited about a new PC last night too :(.


Message edited by ausskiller on 04-01-2008 at 03:47:22 PM
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Don't get the 9800 GTX, just wait for the 9900 GTX/GX2 or get something else. Even a 9800 GTX here costs less than a 8800 GTX which is a joke. NVIDIA really screwed this up.

She turned me into a newt.
Profile: old hand
More Information

Fizzle***

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

This is starting to look alot like the 1900xt vs the 1900xtx vs the 1950xtx debacle. All three of those cards were extremely close, using the same arch. Tho they did come out in less than a year from each other. Hmmmm.. Of course then we all know what happened, nVidia came out with the 8xxx series. For 300 bucks, still a good deal for those who dont have a 8xxx series or a 3xxx ATI series

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by jaydeejohn on 04-01-2008 at 04:23:03 PM

---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I'm putting the final touches on a new system right now and was debating between buying a pair of 8800GT or GTS cards, or scavenging the 8600GTs out of my old box (I got them cheap, and I had done no research at all; I went to Fry's and asked a frigging salesperson, who told me what he thought I wanted to hear.  I consider that purchase to be a case of paying the "idiot tax." ) and using them until the "next big thing" came along.
 
I looked at a 9800GX2 but...ugh.  Heat dumping into the case?  And if I ever wanted to SLI them the heat problem would be even worse.  I'm just not sure this card is a good investment; I want something that'll last me a while, not a gimmick.  "Thanks but no thanks,"  I said.
 
So I thought I'd wait and see what the 9800GTX was like...and I'm not impressed by this review.  I despise an extremely noisy video card, and it sounds like that's exactly what this one is; I'd imagine it's absurd if you SLI them.  The performance seems nice, though; I'm just not sure whether or not it's nice enough to justify the irritation factor.
 
Hopefully the 9900s will be powerful without rattling the windows in your house.

Profile: addict
More Information

but hey, it uses a lot less power. :P

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Yeah I'm not impressed at all... even though I knew this GTS knockoff was coming. :( I would really like a new next gen chip to come out and replace my 7900gtx sli setup. Wonder how much longer I will have to wait for the next gen version of the 8800gtx.


Message edited by cyph0r on 04-01-2008 at 04:38:40 PM
Profile: old hand

hahahahahahaha the 3870x2 beats the sh**e outta the 9800gtx in Crysis 1280*1024 with 4xAA+AA...hillarious :P


---------------
Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
Profile: journeyman
More Information

ATI has the ball now :))

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Ive heard early Q4 for them, tho maybe earlier. Plus, dare I say, theres the 4xxx from ATI


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
She turned me into a newt.
Profile: old hand
More Information

jaydeejohn wrote :

Of course then we all know what happened, nVidia came out with the 8xxx series. For 300 bucks, still a good deal for those who dont have a 8xxx series or a 3xxx ATI series


 
Yeah that is true.  I am sure this makes the 8800GTX owners happy seeing that their 1.5 year old card is still the shiz niz.
 

jaydeejohn wrote :

Ive heard early Q4 for them, tho maybe earlier. Plus, dare I say, theres the 4xxx from ATI


 
 
Now would be perfect timing to unleash the RV770.  This gives the Chrome time to move in too  [:thegreatgrapeape:7]

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by SpinachEat er on 04-01-2008 at 04:56:02 PM
Profile: addict
More Information

Unfortunately no self respecting gamer plays a FPS at 1280x1024.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

SpinachEater wrote :

Yeah that is true.  I am sure this makes the 8800GTX owners happy seeing that their 1.5 year old card is still the shiz niz.
 
 
 
 
Now would be perfect timing to unleash the RV770.


 
Couldn't agree more, I want some real competition. Not just milking the G92's out which the g92 was a bit milking the g80 core out.
 
But it puts a smile on my face that the Ultra still takes a big lead. For such an old card. Just like the GTX, I bought the 8800GTX pretty long ago, and it still kicks ass.  
 
Another thing says, we should have bought the GTX when it came out, and wouldn't have to upgrade for over more then a year now. I think that is a very budget like question.  
 
Anyway, I think if you had bought the ULTRA or GTX from the beginning it came out, it still does great job for its bang, also because it's more than a year old now.  

She turned me into a newt.
Profile: old hand
More Information

ByDesign wrote :

Unfortunately no self respecting gamer plays a FPS at 1280x1024.


 
 
^ hehe
 
 
http://cache.viewimages.com/xc/3332363.jpg?v=1&c=ViewImages&k=2&d=4DAA13B573E1BD2FBE47DDFE96B0D3C1A55A1E4F32AD3138
 
Cow = 8800 GTX, Milker = NV, Milk = $$$


Message edited by SpinachEat er on 04-01-2008 at 05:06:07 PM
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Chrome gamers do!!!! Chrome FTW!!!!!


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: old hand

The 9800GTsuX might seem more attractive at maybe $250. ... at $350 its just daylight robbery. Fanboy zombies would, of course, deny it vehemently and hurl curses and expletives at me...


---------------
Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

mihirkula wrote :

The 9800GTsuX might seem more attractive at maybe $250. ... at $350 its just daylight robbery. Fanboy zombies would, of course, deny it vehemently and hurl curses and expletives at me...


How bout I just hurl?  :o  :o   :lol:  :lol:  Its what it is. For someone not having anything close to this card, its not bad. A let down? Sure, but its better than we were a year ago when  8800GTS320 was going for $300 US


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: old hand

Then they shudve at least named it 9800GTS at least... the GTX is a sort of a premiuim spot ...like miss world.


---------------
Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
She turned me into a newt.
Profile: old hand
More Information
n°1804052
04-01-2008 at 05:25:14 PM