First ever post, so bear with me.
I have a Q6600 and ive been overclocking for a few months now with the Q6600 and 1066mhz ocz ram. Basically to get to the golden 3.6ghz it took me a VERY long time to get it stable on a xfx 780i. All volts apart from vcore were maxed i.e.
vcore = 1.55v
fsb = 1.5v
spp = 1.55v
mcp = 1.7v
spp to mcp = 1.55v
Ram = 2.3v
and GTLVREF all on auto
my question is why should i try and get a 1:1 ratio when everest is telling me that at 3.6ghz and 640mhz ram(effective) that
read speed is 7032mb
write is 7238mb and
copy is 5527mb
Latency at 95.4. and thats the highest i could take the ram stable.
Now at 3.3ghz, same volts( so i know it will work) and ram at 1066mhz, divider at 11:16 i get
read 9918
write 6658
copy 7319
Latency at only 51.4
which is like a 40% increase in read speed. so should i go back to 3.6ghz which was only 1 hour prime stable or stay at 3.3ghz??? Considering i spent over 100 quid on water cooling???
I have a Q6600 and ive been overclocking for a few months now with the Q6600 and 1066mhz ocz ram. Basically to get to the golden 3.6ghz it took me a VERY long time to get it stable on a xfx 780i. All volts apart from vcore were maxed i.e.
vcore = 1.55v
fsb = 1.5v
spp = 1.55v
mcp = 1.7v
spp to mcp = 1.55v
Ram = 2.3v
and GTLVREF all on auto
my question is why should i try and get a 1:1 ratio when everest is telling me that at 3.6ghz and 640mhz ram(effective) that
read speed is 7032mb
write is 7238mb and
copy is 5527mb
Latency at 95.4. and thats the highest i could take the ram stable.
Now at 3.3ghz, same volts( so i know it will work) and ram at 1066mhz, divider at 11:16 i get
read 9918
write 6658
copy 7319
Latency at only 51.4
which is like a 40% increase in read speed. so should i go back to 3.6ghz which was only 1 hour prime stable or stay at 3.3ghz??? Considering i spent over 100 quid on water cooling???