wait, are you talking about pentium d or pentium dual core?
the later is pretty much a core 2.. i would advise it. It will be significantly faster than the 3800+..
wait, are you talking about pentium d or pentium dual core?
the later is pretty much a core 2.. i would advise it. It will be significantly faster than the 3800+..
------------------------------Q6600 (overclocked to 3.2ghz) GAp35-DS-3L mobo, 8BG G-SKILL ddr2-1066, gigabyte gts 250(1GB), 2x dvd burner,320gb hard drive,640gb hard drive, black antec p182 case with corsair 750 watt psu.
Reply to reconviperone1
Thread : Dual Core Athlon X2 3800+ vs Pentium4 Dual Core 2.8
reconviperone1
monst0r wrote :
wait, are you talking about pentium d or pentium dual core?
the later is pretty much a core 2.. i would advise it. It will be significantly faster than the 3800+..
Well the op said a pentium4 dual core so whatever chip he is looking at the amd is the better choice.
What the op should be considering is the pentium dual cores(e2**0 series allendales) Which peform just about the same as the said amd chip.
Do not listen to anybody that says get a AM2+ plus mobo. That is just a pure waste of money. For a low cost media pc there is no need at all to put a 3800x2 a x2 4000 heck any x2 cpu with the lastest amd boards. Thats like buying a intel x48 chipset to run a pentium 4.
The reason they (and I) suggest the 780G board is because it has the BEST current IGP. This allows you to use a smaller CPU for HD and video stuff. The AM2+ ability is a non-issue. Just search for 780G on google and you will find tons of reviews about how good it is at video playback, many using inferior CPUs (single core and low duals).
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.