Tom's Hardware > Forum > Home Theatre > HDTV > best DTV tuners?

best DTV tuners?

Forum Home Theatre : HDTV - best DTV tuners?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Who makes/sells the best (IYHO) tuners for use with HDTV (or SDTV) monitors
(the kind without the tuners)? I looked around at a couple major brands
and I'm not finding this product at all. I was hoping to find something
that handled world standards, in addition to USA. But maybe finding any
product at all would be good.

Are there any that can deliver the raw bit stream before dividing it up
into subchannels, audio/video, etc? Maybe for direct computer input?

--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Phil Howard KA9WGN | http://linuxhomepage.com/ http://ham.org/ |
| (first name) at ipal.net | http://phil.ipal.org/ http://ka9wgn.ham.org/ |
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:

>Who makes/sells the best (IYHO) tuners for use with HDTV (or SDTV) monitors
>(the kind without the tuners)? I looked around at a couple major brands
>and I'm not finding this product at all.

For all the heavily promoted "HDTV Ready" monitors you'd think there
would be more ads for STBs. But many purchasers rent digital cable
boxes, or buy the equivalent for satellite. And some just watch NTSC
analog on the built-in tuners and don't know the difference.

> I was hoping to find something
>that handled world standards, in addition to USA. But maybe finding any
>product at all would be good.

Not much call for a tuner that handles world standards. How many
places are there where you can receive more than one? Even in the
analog realm you'd be hard pressed to find a tuner that handles
everything. Better to buy separate tuners for the standards you need
to deal with.

Among ATSC tuners, LG is well regarded for PQ. The LST-4200A tunes
ATSC (OTA) and clear QAM (cable). The LST-3510A adds a DVD player
with upconversion (but note that it is not a DVD recorder, as some
people expect it to be). The LST-3410A, now out of production, can
record HD to hard drive. It's had reliability problems, mostly
related to the Gemstar guide but also to heat. Many owners find that
it does what it does well enough that they will put up with the
problems.

Sony has two DVRs (DHGHDD250 and DHGHDD500, differing only in hard
drive size) with CableCard capability, which allows you to subscribe
to scrambled QAM. I've seen no reviews, but a search of AVSForum
should turn up something.
>
>Are there any that can deliver the raw bit stream before dividing it up
>into subchannels, audio/video, etc? Maybe for direct computer input?

Here there's a good answer. Add a tuner card with that ability to a
PC. My recommendation for a Windows-based computer is the MyHD line,
currently MDP-130, which tunes ATSC and clear QAM. The earlier
ATSC-only cards saved the whole stream, and you could select the
desired subchannel on playback. QAM recording doubles the bitrate,
requiring twice the HDD storage, so they added the ability to record
just the desired subchannel. That's a software change; it works for
the older cards as well. And it's a user option; you can still record
the whole stream if you want to.

Del Mibbler

Reply to Anonymous
- 0 +

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Everett Ogden wrote:
> phil-news-nospam@ipal.net wrote:
>
>
>>Who makes/sells the best (IYHO) tuners for use with HDTV (or SDTV) monitors
>>(the kind without the tuners)? I looked around at a couple major brands
>>and I'm not finding this product at all.
>
>
> For all the heavily promoted "HDTV Ready" monitors you'd think there
> would be more ads for STBs. But many purchasers rent digital cable
> boxes, or buy the equivalent for satellite. And some just watch NTSC
> analog on the built-in tuners and don't know the difference.
>
>
>> I was hoping to find something
>>that handled world standards, in addition to USA. But maybe finding any
>>product at all would be good.
>
>
> Not much call for a tuner that handles world standards. How many
> places are there where you can receive more than one? Even in the
> analog realm you'd be hard pressed to find a tuner that handles
> everything. Better to buy separate tuners for the standards you need
> to deal with.
>
> Among ATSC tuners, LG is well regarded for PQ. The LST-4200A tunes
> ATSC (OTA) and clear QAM (cable). The LST-3510A adds a DVD player
> with upconversion (but note that it is not a DVD recorder, as some
> people expect it to be). The LST-3410A, now out of production, can
> record HD to hard drive. It's had reliability problems, mostly
> related to the Gemstar guide but also to heat. Many owners find that
> it does what it does well enough that they will put up with the
> problems.
>
> Sony has two DVRs (DHGHDD250 and DHGHDD500, differing only in hard
> drive size) with CableCard capability, which allows you to subscribe
> to scrambled QAM. I've seen no reviews, but a search of AVSForum
> should turn up something.
>
>>Are there any that can deliver the raw bit stream before dividing it up
>>into subchannels, audio/video, etc? Maybe for direct computer input?
>
>
> Here there's a good answer. Add a tuner card with that ability to a
> PC. My recommendation for a Windows-based computer is the MyHD line,
> currently MDP-130, which tunes ATSC and clear QAM. The earlier
> ATSC-only cards saved the whole stream, and you could select the
> desired subchannel on playback. QAM recording doubles the bitrate,
> requiring twice the HDD storage, so they added the ability to record
> just the desired subchannel. That's a software change; it works for
> the older cards as well. And it's a user option; you can still record
> the whole stream if you want to.
>
> Del Mibbler

I have found the only local store that carries many brands of OTA tuners
is Circuit City. They have Samsung, Pro, and ? in the $200+ range.
Fry's Electronics is inconsistent in they have few or none, the last
time I was there they had 2 Sony's with hard drives for $1000 and $800
that will record HDTV.

I recently purchased a refurbished Samsung SIR-451 through Amazon and it
works great in comparison to my ATI HDTV Wonder. The most powerful
local stations show a bit of stutter-step every few minutes when I use
the HDTV Wonder and there are several weaker local stations that
consistently have sound but no picture. The Samsung shows the weaker
stations without flaw.

I was thinking about building my own "OTA Tivo" unit based upon the ATI
HDTV Wonder and either the ATI software or Windows/XP Media Center. I
purchased the refurbished Samsung just to have something to compare to
the HDTV Wonder. The HDTV Wonder now looks like junk.

The MyHD card seems a bit pricy, around $300. (Did I hear ATI bought
them out?) Adding that to my home-build shopping list takes the total
above the price of the Sony unit. The total cost plus having to boot
W/XP before watching TV is making me look around a bit more before I try
building my own.

Roger

Reply to Roger

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Roger <crosseyedpenguin@cox.net> wrote (in part):

>I was thinking about building my own "OTA Tivo" unit based upon the ATI
>HDTV Wonder and either the ATI software or Windows/XP Media Center. I
>purchased the refurbished Samsung just to have something to compare to
>the HDTV Wonder. The HDTV Wonder now looks like junk.

That's pretty much in line with what others have said about the HDTV
Wonder. My own experience with ATI is only with their video cards
(quite a few of them over the years) and my general opinion is that
they have good hardware but poor drivers. I really can't explain why
I keep buying them. Next time I swear I'm trying nVidia.
>
>The MyHD card seems a bit pricy, around $300. (Did I hear ATI bought
>them out?)

I certainly hope they haven't been bought out. The MyHD cards are
worth more to me because they do MPEG2 decoding in hardware, while
most other cards do it in software. That drastically reduces the load
on the CPU and allows the card to be used in a lesser PC. If you just
use it as a tuner without trying to save to the hard drive, you can
get away with a 266 MHz CPU running Win98SE. They recommend 800 MHz
minimum to save to HDD, and XP to save files >4 GB or work with a
D-VHS recorder over Firewire.

Another big plus is that the manufacturer (MIT, no relation to the
college) is quick to come out with software fixes and improvements.
Recent additions include timeshift (watch earlier parts of a show
while it's still being recorded), record just a subchannel instead of
the whole stream and Closed Caption support (the latter still in open
beta the last I looked). And all of these work with their older
cards.

>Adding that to my home-build shopping list takes the total
>above the price of the Sony unit. The total cost plus having to boot
>W/XP before watching TV is making me look around a bit more before I try
>building my own.
>
>Roger

As noted above, you don't need a top-of-the-line PC for these cards;
you might have one lying around that would do. Nor do you need an
expensive video card; although the MyHD can put up a picture as an
overlay on your desktop, its primary outputs (component and optionally
DVI) are separate. While I'd recommend XP, you neither need nor want
the Media Center version. Finally, neither the Sony nor the LG DVRs
can match the versatility of saving HDTV as standard transport stream
files which can be manipulated with a growing number of programs (many
of them free) and archived to your choice of mass storage. I'm
currently using DVDs as plain data discs but as prices drop I'm
leaning toward removeable hard drives.

Del Mibbler

Reply to Anonymous

Archived from groups: alt.tv.tech.hdtv (More info?)

 

Del Mibbler (mibbler@nycap.rr.com) wrote in alt.tv.tech.hdtv:
> >The MyHD card seems a bit pricy, around $300. (Did I hear ATI bought
> >them out?)
>
> I certainly hope they haven't been bought out.

Nope, they're still made by MIT, but rumor has it that ATI was interested
in licensing some tech.

> The MyHD cards are
> worth more to me because they do MPEG2 decoding in hardware, while
> most other cards do it in software. That drastically reduces the load
> on the CPU and allows the card to be used in a lesser PC. If you just
> use it as a tuner without trying to save to the hard drive, you can
> get away with a 266 MHz CPU running Win98SE. They recommend 800 MHz
> minimum to save to HDD, and XP to save files >4 GB or work with a
> D-VHS recorder over Firewire.

The recommendations are very conservative. If you don't use the "overlay"
to view HD on the Windows desktop, you can get away with about 50-75% the
specs they recommend.

Like Del, I can't say enough good things about the MyHD cards.

--
Jeff Rife | "She just dropped by to remind me that my life
| is an endless purgatory, interrupted by profound
| moments of misery."
| -- Richard Karinsky, "Caroline in the City"

Reply to Anonymous
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Home Theatre > HDTV > best DTV tuners?
Go to:

There are 1082 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them