Crysis Performance: v1.0 vs v1.1 vs v1.2

[review_benchmark_hun]

Processor: Intel Core2Quad Q6600 @ 3.2Ghz (355x9)
Motherboard: ASUS P5B-E PLUS i965P Rev.1G
Memory: 2x1GB Kingston Value Ram DDR2-800 @ DDR2-1066 5-5-5-18
Graphics: MSI NX8800GT OC (T2D512E) @ 712/1728/999
Storage: Hitachi 160GB 7.2krpm SATA 3.0Gbps
Power Supply: Coolermaster iGreen 500W
Display: BenQ FP202W 20.1” 1680x1050 8ms

OS: Windows XP Pro SP2 32-bit + DX9.0c
Chipset: Intel INF 8.3.1.1009
Motherboard BIOS: 0627
Graphics: Forceware 171.17 WHQL

Source: http://lly316.blogspot.com/2008/04/crysis-performance-benchmarks-10-vs-11.html

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

Benching Crysis in xp? Pointless, Vista 64 bit or nothing.

 

[Annisman]

That 'pointless' OS you speak of is used by the VAST majority of gamers.

 

[Guest]

hes got a point though... to really test crysis you should use vista as its going to be the new os soon and really shows what crysis has... or you could just look up triple c on google, download it, get so much more fps for crysis while it looks a lot better =D

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

And shouldnt they be using the 174.47 drivers as well?

 

[vip3569]

vista bad

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

vista bad

I pity the fool!

Don't you mean 174.74?

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

Maybe its dyslexia. I wnet to the meeting and they were all saying "fellow dyslexians UNTIE"

 

[jaguarskx]

I'll wait for Windows 7.

 

[rammedstein]

Maybe its dyslexia. I wnet to the meeting and they were all saying "fellow dyslexians UNTIE"

heh, nah, it just happens wiht time, one hand (generally the hand you use to write wiht) becomes a faster typer than the other oen so you press keys slightly faster wiht it than the other.

lol, windows 7 thats a joke... although, after using vista 64 for some lengthy period of time, i do find it rather nice, small features mainly, like ;'open file location" in the context menu, and the individual volume control per program...

i think it should be benched on vista 64, not because it is what everyone IS using, but because it will be what everyone WILL BE using...

 

[T8RR8R]

I'm guessing that most people will just jump from XP to Windows 7. Vista is basically a Windows 7 Beta IMHO.

Even if Windows 7 sucks, it's not like you have much of a choice. Vista or Windows 7, we'll have to wait and see what the lesser of the 2 evils is. From the pics that I've seen, I'm thinking that Windows 7 is based off of Vista, like XP was based all the way back from Win95.

 

[bf2gameplaya]

Benching Crysis in xp? Pointless, Vista 64 bit or nothing.

Your Vista Fanboi opinion is in the minority for good reason. Crysis is similar to Vista in that they are both not suitable for gamers, yet, if ever.

Enjoy your low frame rates.

 

[LAN_deRf_HA]

You're the poster child for ill informed. Your mentality is weak, like that of a mac user or anyone else who must follow hollow trends of love to hate or love to buy. Keep your idiocies to yourself and don't burden others with your pathetic opinions and mentalities.

 

[nkarasch]

Its great that they are making performance improvements as time goes on.

And Vista and XP work great. Vista is much much more secure and its pretty. It also supports DX10 and has never crashed on me. File transfers are slower but oh well.

 

[acidpython]

Vista annoys the hell out of me But still i use it, DX10 and constant updates are what made me part with my $.

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

Im wondering, will the new FS be on windows 7, and isnt that the main reason why file transfers are that slow?

 

[emp]

I really love how all these vista haters are planning a direct jump from XP to Windows 7, which all sounds nice and dandy, but it's not going to be like that.

Based on history, please DO tell me when has Microsoft launched an OS in the past 10 years that hasn't sucked to the point of blowing your brains out. Windows 98? SO good they had to release 98 SE to correct all the screw ups. Windows ME? Enough said. Windows 2000? I guess it wasn't THAT bad, but not really worth it. Windows XP? Now it's great. but back then it was getting the same treat as Vista does now.

So please tell me... what makes you think that Windows 7 will be so much better than Vista is...? Honestly all Vista haters are obviously talking out of ignorance or out of stupidity. I would say for regular people they talk out of ignorance, but haters in this forum obviously talk out of stupidity.

 

[enewmen]

Good topic idea. But like most here, I'll rather see Vista 64, 4+ gigs RAM, and newest drivers.
BTW, I didn't have any problems with any software after I installed Vista 64 SP1.

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

Another thing Im wondering, and havnt read up on it, is will windows 7 be 64bit only?

 

[randomizer]

I don't see any mention of the graphical bugs they added in 1.1.

 

[JAYDEEJOHN]

LOL

 

[Mousemonkey]

Honestly all Vista haters are obviously talking out of ignorance or out of stupidity. I would say for regular people they talk out of ignorance, but haters in this forum obviously talk out of stupidity.

But what about those of us who refuse to use Fista out of laziness, stubbornness and plain old tight fisted(ness). :lol:

 

[Mousemonkey]

Another thing Im wondering, and havnt read up on it, is will windows 7 be 64bit only?

I'm sure I saw mention of a 32bit as well as a 64bit version.

 

[aziraphale]

You're the poster child for ill informed. Your mentality is weak, like that of a mac user or anyone else who must follow hollow trends of love to hate or love to buy. Keep your idiocies to yourself and don't burden others with your pathetic opinions and mentalities.

Having a bad hair day?

 

[enewmen]

Another thing Im wondering, and havnt read up on it, is will windows 7 be 64bit only?

Windows 7 was 64bit ONLY. Until the eee PC came out. Now Microsoft wants Windows 7 to work off flash based - 32 bit notebooks as well. (can't have people using Linux on those MIDs/UMPCs !!)
I think Microsoft should be working only with 64 bit everything - even 64bit flash based notebooks. Most future (or current) MID, UMPCs, etc are 64bit now anyways.