Nice, but unless people find new ways to limit Vista HDD footprint, the 32GB version might be too small for that OS. No idea about Win7.
------------------------------The capacity to learn is a gift; The ability to learn is a skill; The willingness to learn is a choice. - Rebec of Ginaz
Reply to Zenthar
Nice job choosing an ancient scsi drive. That isn't exactly a fair comparison. Here's a more modern Cheetah 15k.6 (5.6ms access time btw)
That's one gen old - you can now get a 600GB Cheetah 15k.7 which is even faster, but I couldn't find any reviews. Note that even the Cheetah 15k.7 is cheaper per GB than the 32GB $99 SSD.
That's one gen old - you can now get a 600GB Cheetah 15k.7 which is even faster, but I couldn't find any reviews. Note that even the Cheetah 15k.7 is cheaper per GB than the 32GB $99 SSD.
I just have tests from drives i have on hand.
------------------------------Core I7 920 D0 @ 4.2Ghz
MSI X58 Pro-E
32GB SSD, WD Blacks In R0
Sapphire HD 5870's In XFire
Reply to PsychoSaysDie
Yes, no one disagrees that SSD's are not hugely better than HDD's for read and access time. They take the crown hands down. But as others are asking about, where are the write speeds. From what I hear, most people become disappointed with them as they start using them day to day.
After you have used the drive for a month or so, why don't you post back and let us know how you like it? Most posts I have ever seen people brag about these drives at first, then later even though they keep posting about other things, stop talking about their SSD drive.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.