Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » RV 770 is 50% faster than RV 670
 

RV 770 is 50% faster than RV 670

Add a reply



 Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : RV 770 is 50% faster than RV 670
 
Profile: old hand

Here's what Fudzilla had to say:
 

Quote :

We learned that the RV770 GPU already went to production and there is a big chance to see R700 generation much earlier than anyone has expected. TSMC is already in pilot production and the chips are, as we reported earlier, developed in 55nm machitecture.
 
The way it looks now, there is a strong possibility that R700 should show its face at Computex (June 3) while the launch itself might be shortly before or after Computex. We still don’t have the final details.
 
RV770 is the based on the R700 design and the R700 itself consists of two RV770 chips. From what we know, RV770 should be at least fifty percent faster than the RV670.
 
If all goes well there is a big chance that R700 will launch in Q2, but rather later than earlier. We are still in the dark about the real details of D10U 30 as this GPU(s) has a similar schedule and ought to launch in Q2.  


 
 
Good news for a huge horde of gamers and ATI/AMD or malignant rumour set to disappoint as always?


---------------
Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
Related Pr oduct
Register or log in to remove.

Profile: addict
More Information

WoW 8800gtx speeds, nearly two years on...

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Im looking at 10+% faster than the Ultra


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: addict
More Information

well the Computex part was new, the rest was pretty much old news already

Profile: old hand
More Information

Let's hope it's true.


---------------
Gaming: FX-60 @ 2.81GHz (x14, 1.375, 90nm) > A8N-SLI Deluxe > Asus 4850 - 625/1986 > 2GB Corsair XMS 400MHz  
2-3-3-6-1T
HTPC/Light Gaming: X2 5400+ 2.8GHz Brisbane > Gigabyte 780G MATX - 900MHz Core > 2GB Corsair XMS2 800MHz  
4-4-4-12-2T
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Kari wrote :

well the Computex part was new, the rest was pretty much old news already


 
Indeed.

She turned me into a newt.
Profile: old hand
More Information

dos1986 wrote :

WoW 8800gtx speeds, nearly two years on...


 
 
The same can be said about NV.

Profile: newbie
More Information

SpinachEater wrote :

The same can be said about NV.


 
But nVidia has had a card at 8800GTX speeds for nearly two years.  It's called the 8800GTX.

She turned me into a newt.
Profile: old hand
More Information

And two years later the 9800GTX arrives...how did that do?

Profile: journeyman
More Information

Thats good news for ATI fans. I'm waiting to see how this new chipset will go against NVIDIA.

Serenity Now!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

lol ever heard of the GX2? boosting almost double the Ultra in some benchmarks?
 
and the 9800 GTX is better than the Ultra, and is 300 which means they did advance because its a huge performance for only 300:)
 
Ati is traveling walking speed lol and Nvidia is running, I hope ATI catches up because I wanna switch back over!


---------------
L1qu1dat1on Ag3
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.6, RAM: 8 gig 1066 5-4-3-6, Fan: Water Cooling, Mobo: Asus Striker II Formula, Hard Drive: 2x's 150 Raptor (RAID), VGA: BFG 9800 GX2 (770, 1125)PSU:CorsairHX1000 Windows Vista Ultimate 64
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

i didnt hear the 9800gtx being better than ultra... at least at higher resolutions.

Serenity Now!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

it managed to hold its own. At EXTREMELY HIGH res like over 2000 thats when it dipped down. at HD 1080p It was better:)


---------------
L1qu1dat1on Ag3
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.6, RAM: 8 gig 1066 5-4-3-6, Fan: Water Cooling, Mobo: Asus Striker II Formula, Hard Drive: 2x's 150 Raptor (RAID), VGA: BFG 9800 GX2 (770, 1125)PSU:CorsairHX1000 Windows Vista Ultimate 64
I'm bad, I'm nationwide
Profile: enthusiast
More Information

makotech222 wrote :

i didnt hear the 9800gtx being better than ultra... at least at higher resolutions.


And thus in lies the problem!  16 ROPs, 256-bit bus and 512 MB ram castrated our new 'king' of the 9 series.

 

Go ATI, I really want you to succeed.  For some reason the last 4 times I have purchased a new VGA, nVIDIA has had the best offering.


Message edited by badgtx1969 on 04-10-2008 at 05:55:44 AM

---------------
Take what man makes and use it,  
But do not worship it,  
For it shall pass.
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

The problem is, the GTX is not really faster than the Ultra, and its using brand new drivers vs months old drivers http://www.anandtech.com/video/sho [...] i=3275&p=6 It trades blows, but thats it. Im thinking the 4870 will be a more clear cut winner, if not in almost all games


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Serenity Now!
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

Those are still Beta Drivers, lol Quad sli GX2 isn't fixed yet, and the 9800 GTX came out on April 1st LOL sooo they aren't new drivers


---------------
L1qu1dat1on Ag3
CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad Q9450 @ 3.6, RAM: 8 gig 1066 5-4-3-6, Fan: Water Cooling, Mobo: Asus Striker II Formula, Hard Drive: 2x's 150 Raptor (RAID), VGA: BFG 9800 GX2 (770, 1125)PSU:CorsairHX1000 Windows Vista Ultimate 64
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Have you read any of the posts? Even some making conspiracy about those "beta" drivers, which arent used on the 8xxx series by the way


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: addict
More Information

I hope it's fast enough to take the top spot. That way Nvidia will stop puking out repackaged 8800s.

Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

All those posts showed people were getting better framerates using them, when they could that is


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Look, I have a 8800 too, and Ive been waiting forever for a driver update


---------------
Every artist is a cannibal,every poet is a thief,they all kill their inspiration then sing about their grief
Profile: old hand

How much of a difference do you guys think the 55nm fab process for the RV770 make over the 65nm for the 9800GTsuX .... the RV670 was 55nm too ....and it was quite a giant leap from the prev gen ATI cards.  
 
I know the 55nm fab manuf will make it cheaper than the 98xx.... but for how much power output? The 3870 was slightly behind the 8800GT.


---------------
Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information