There is a simple answer to this question. When you calculate the Memory speed of a video card, you multiply it by 2 to get the 'effective' memory speed. Therefore 972 X 2 = 1940 Mhz. That is where those numbers are coming from. Also, keep in mind when you see somebody say that they increased their memory from 2000Mhz to 2200Mhz etc... The amount that they overclocked would have only been 100Mhz.
---------------
E8400@ 3.93Ghz, BFG 9800GX2
4 GB Mushkin DDR 800, Asus P5E X38,
2X Raptor X, X-FI Fatality Pro, Zalman 850 W P.S.
Zalman 9700 CPU Cooler, XCLIO A380 Case, 24" Asus MK241H Monitor
^You're right. ATITool will give you the effective speed. It should work for your card, it works for a lot on Nvidia cards. If not it won't hurt anything, just uninstall it.
Message edited by Zorg on 04-10-2008 at 07:24:28 AM
judging by what you said, Id blame the MOBO/GFX card/w.e program you used to check the speed.
Well, it depends on what speed type you are looking at. If you see 1000Mhz when you 'should' be seeing 2000Mhz then it is really a user error for not realizing to double the memory speed to get the effective speeds of the card. With that being said, they really need to do away with these kinds of things...and CPU multipliers and all that garbage, let's all leave the math parts out of computer issues.
Well, it depends on what speed type you are looking at. If you see 1000Mhz when you 'should' be seeing 2000Mhz then it is really a user error for not realizing to double the memory speed to get the effective speeds of the card. With that being said, they really need to do away with these kinds of things...and CPU multipliers and all that garbage, let's all leave the math parts out of computer issues.
Uh, he was joking. The part in caps that is.
Message edited by Zorg on 04-10-2008 at 07:03:30 AM
I believe the difference on the PCIe is the amount of data transfered to the mobo so PCIe 2.0 would be twice the speed of data to mobo and back to GFX.