Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > DX 10.1, any1 getting excited over? I'm not:S

DX 10.1, any1 getting excited over? I'm not:S

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - DX 10.1, any1 getting excited over? I'm not:S

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Word :    Username :           
 

So i saw what Dx 10.1 offers, and to honest I think they rushed DX10 way to fast and should've included it in the original. I'm not really going to cry over such small upgrades.

I think its just another way to push the market a bit. Remember the DX 10 Video cards they came too early I personally think.

I think the smart thing to say would be, if you want 10.1 wait until they use it in games, and buy a video card then. I mean it was really stupid how Ati put it in their cards, and by the time a game comes out, the frames won't be as blazing as they were when it was a new card.

I don't want to knock off ATI personally I'm just saying. I mean I didn't buy a DX 10 Card till Bioshock came out for PC. which was about 6 months later or so.


Lets see the 10.1 Features:

http://images.tomshardware.com/2007/10/29/amd_hd_3800_to_support_dx_10/gi-demo10-7.jpg

I don't Find this^ is worth the wait:S

I mean its cool to have it, but nothing to cry about:)

Illumination and Shadows don't really matter to me, I usually like turning off the shadows in many games, except the ones that they actually count like Assasin's creed and F.E.A.R but I see no difference really in any other game:S

Anyways tell me your opinions, I'm not saying I'm right, I'm just curious if its a good investment for the time being:)

My Verdict: No

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.

Nah, I'm more excited about finding an E8400 for £130. :)

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

Not really especially since I'm gonna continue using Win XP until Windows 7 comes out either late next year or early 2010.

------------------------------ Q9450 |Corsair XMS 4GB DDR 800 | ABit IP35 Pro | HD 5850 | Audigy 2 | Seasonic S12 550 | Cooler Master Centurion 532 | NEC LCD2690WUXi and Planar PX2611w | WinXP

Peace on Earth by means of the destruction of all life on Earth.
Reply to jaguarskx
- 0 +

mousemonkey wrote :

Nah, I'm more excited about finding an E8400 for £130. :)



LoL i like that answer:P

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

It's all about the here and now. :)

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey
- 0 +

Amen, but sometimes its good 2 think ahead;)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Yes I can't argue with that but as you have already said, when DX10.1 games are released then I would look to whatever cards are available, but not before.

E8400 WOOT! :)

------------------------------ [:mousemonkey:1] http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/5041/vr2009champ.jpg
Reply to mousemonkey

The fact that you don't think the gains are beneficial over DX10 is neither here nor there.
It all depends on when it's released. If MS release 10.1 tomorrow and games start getting effects specifically for it in 6 months then Nvidia would be looking rather stupid.
Until DX10 becomes the norm, I can't see 10.1 being introduced in the near future.

------------------------------ 6000+ Stock, GA M57SLi-S4, XFX 8800GTX's SLi Stock, 4Gb Corsair PC6400 DHX, CoolerMaster 850W, 36Gb Raptor boot drive, 2x150Gb Raptor's in RAID 0 - XFX RAID controller & 300Gb Seagate. PowerBook G4 12" 1.5GHz, Go5200 64mb, 768mb RAM, 80Gb HD, SuperDrive.
Reply to LukeBird
- -1 +

Thats exactly my point. SO the Ati 10.1 were pretty pointless:)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Direct X10.1 sounds to add quite a few features to make it superior to Direct X10, however it'll be quite some time before we see these features implemented.

Reply to Heyyou27
- -1 +

Hey you have a dreamcast as well? :D Awesome system:)


Even the makes of the Dx 10 say they aren't anything major just minor updates, and it's backwards compatible.

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

L1qu1d wrote :

Thats exactly my point. SO the Ati 10.1 were pretty pointless:)


Well the R600 architecture seemed to be capable of DX10.1 all along, so adding it in for the HD3k series was a no brainer. I suspect these features would have been included in the initial release of DX10 had Nvidia been able to deliver :ange:

Reply to homerdog
- -1 +

well Nvidia started on the process long before DX10.1 and didn't find out about till they were finished. And I think they don't see a point to it 2:)

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

I think liquid is in denial about something and his entire posts purpose is to somehow justify penis envy of some kind.

This entire topic is extremely pathetic. Whats wrong? Run out of other things to post about so decided to rehash a really old and pointless argument to make yourself feel better...

:lol: :pt1cable:

Reply to sandmanwn
- 0 +

Well, honestly i think this DX10 "mess" will only stop when they launch a version of backwards compatible.
Its not feasable to think, every M$ OS coming out, a new NOT backwards compatible DX will go out.

Hardware manufacturers and game developers would turn the OpenGL or PowerVR way pretty fast. not to mentions us the normal users.

As for me, once im finishing "dubbing" my VMwares and deciding if i keep dual booting (or not) ill try to use the less i can M$ products.

The DX scandal.
The DRM scandal.
The Premium Ready or Vista Ready scandal.
The Digitally Device Driver scandal.
A really Bad Kernel (thats no scandal).
The OOXML scandal (now this one is completely outrageous)

There are a loads more of them, i just cant remember right now. From now on Linux. For me that is. Sorry about the rant, but i think M$ has suprassed the limits of tolerance.

------------------------------ Rock journalism is people who can't write interviewing people who can't talk for people who can't read - Frank Zappa
Reply to radnor
- -1 +

sandmanwn wrote :

I think liquid is in denial about something and his entire posts purpose is to somehow justify penis envy of some kind.

This entire topic is extremely pathetic. Whats wrong? Run out of other things to post about so decided to rehash a really old and pointless argument to make yourself feel better...

:lol: :pt1cable:



Well personally I was asking people's opinions, but if you've got the biggest c*ck of us all how bout you explain instead of pissing all over every1? Justify your answer, you didn't help the topic at all. I don't see why this topic is any worse than others?

I think your the 1 in denial, coming head strong in a topic you didn't even answer squat. How about you go and read MaximumPC or if you ant I'll scan the article for you.

Second of all why you talking about my penis man? Some obsession with the C O C K S? I think your in the wrong forum then.

I didn't see any1 else type a rude comment like this, did you lose the censor in your brain?

K well I'll wait for vent...I'll assume your going to try denying your homosexuality and your answer in the next post.

Thanks to all who post their answers, if your going to vent on me, justify your answers and please don't talk about my c*ck its not cool, I'm pretty homophobic, thnx.

Peace

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

radnor wrote :

Well, honestly i think this DX10 "mess" will only stop when they launch a version of backwards compatible.
Its not feasable to think, every M$ OS coming out, a new NOT backwards compatible DX will go out.

 

Hardware manufacturers and game developers would turn the OpenGL or PowerVR way pretty fast. not to mentions us the normal users.


I'd love to see more OpenGL games too. :P
I'm ready for Linux, I just need my games. :(

 

Lets hope Microsoft screws something up with DirectX then.


Message edited by kingoftherings on 04-13-2008 at 03:57:48 AM
Reply to kingoftherings

DX 10 or DX 10.1, there may be no difference, so it really doesn't matter that much. Now at least. Either way as long as you don't make having DX10.1 the only reason you get a DX 10.1 capable card, there shouldn't be a problem. Its not like the ATI cards cost alot more or anything, so its not really like you are going to be paying additional for DX 10.1 ready.

To each his own.

Reply to madaniel

Heh, I thought it might be some sort of jealous envious deal. Figures...

 

Hey I only mentioned penis envy once. You on the other hand wrote several paragraphs on the subject and even branched into cocks and other colorful metaphors. You must be very disappointed with certain physical problems you must be having. Sorry I touched on such a sensitive topic for you. Really, in the end however, you only proved my point. A worthless post to get some crappy debate going over something that doesnt really matter so you can make yourself feel better about what is most likely a troubling concern over a purchase decision of yours.

 

What a pathetic display. If such small and trivial things bother you so much there are plenty of means to putting yourself out of your own misery.


Message edited by sandmanwn on 04-13-2008 at 05:18:27 AM
Reply to sandmanwn
- 0 +

I was pretty disappointed by DX10, so I don't expect much from 10.1. Still, i'm pleased ATI is trying to innovate. Eventually it may pay off.


Message edited by EXT64 on 04-13-2008 at 05:17:22 AM
------------------------------ New Build (Under Contruction): Intel Core i5 750 > Gigabyte GA-P55-UD4P > 2x2GB GSkill 1600MHz CL7 1.65V > Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB > Antec 300 Illusion > Asus 4850 512MB w/AM Cooler > Corsair 650HX > Hyper 212 Plus > See other Builds in Member Config
Reply to EXT64
- -1 +

Until you justify your answers, your posts are as pathetic as ever. Your complaining about my thoughts, how would you kno what I'm trying to point out. I created this topic, to see if some1 could convince me other wise, not flame on me about completely irrelevant stuff.

Please if you need to vent do it somewhere else, I'm trying to get a real answer.

But I promise if I ever need to make a pointless post or anythign I'll msg you directly.

Empty words and accusation are your specialty.

Done

EXT64 I see your point. Agreed Ati is trying to shine a roadway to encourage the new technology. Do you think it will have any effects?

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

L1qu1d wrote :

Until you justify your answers, your posts are as pathetic as ever. Your complaining about my thoughts, how would you kno what I'm trying to point out. I created this topic, to see if some1 could convince me other wise, not flame on me about completely irrelevant stuff.

Please if you need to vent do it somewhere else, I'm trying to get a real answer.



A real answer to a post that is just an opinion

Good luck with that

Reply to turboflame

ATI hasnt done anything to lead the way. The way, DX10 was what the 2900XT was capable of. But, M$ changed the standard, because nVidia couldnt make a full DX10 card, so they omitted several abilities/standards so nVidia could still be in the game. The 2900 was fully capable, not leading the way. DX10.1 is just the rest of DX10, and unfortunately nVidia still is non-compliant

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
- -1 +

turboflame wrote :

A real answer to a post that is just an opinion

Good luck with that




Opinions can be justified so don't give me the "Good luck" routine

I think blah because, blah blah... easy enough right?

Thank You


Yes jaydeeJohn that is a good point. I was hoping Nvidia was Dx 10.1 but meh they probably kno something we dont:S

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

OP: "I don't think DX10.1 is worth it because I don't think it's cool enough. PROVE ME WRONG."

Someone else: "This is stupid"

OP:

L1qu1d wrote :

Well personally I was asking people's opinions, but if you've got the biggest c*ck of us all how bout you explain instead of pissing all over every1? Justify your answer, you didn't help the topic at all. I don't see why this topic is any worse than others?

I think your the 1 in denial, coming head strong in a topic you didn't even answer squat. How about you go and read MaximumPC or if you ant I'll scan the article for you.

Second of all why you talking about my penis man? Some obsession with the C O C K S? I think your in the wrong forum then.

I didn't see any1 else type a rude comment like this, did you lose the censor in your brain?

K well I'll wait for vent...I'll assume your going to try denying your homosexuality and your answer in the next post.

Thanks to all who post their answers, if your going to vent on me, justify your answers and please don't talk about my c*ck its not cool, I'm pretty homophobic, thnx.



Seriously, there's no point to this thread.

Reply to turboflame
- -1 +

moving on

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

Apparently both ATI and M$ thought it was something deserving, since thats what M$ originally had, and ATI made. More eye candy is more eye candy

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn

i think if microsoft+intel+nvidia then we all will have the best product but i think would be at a ridiculous price since they will eventually wipe out AMD,VIA etc.

Reply to iluvgillgill
- 0 +

also true.

How about OpenGl I remember reading that Windows Vista doesn't support it or doesn't handle it well. I might be wrong

Sorry thats a little off topic but I don't feel like re posting a topic. haha

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116
http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg
Lapped CPU
http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png
Reply to L1qu1d

in ati tweak guide, they said that if you set into 2 pre rendering, its actually help fps. dunno in nvidia, but ill try & see the result in COH performance test.

Reply to spotless
- 0 +

Vista doesnt support OpenGL ? that i didnt know. Good god, i should tweak my XP Vmware aswell.

More trouble.

PS: Dang: Crashed my linux again, Ati drivers sucks for Linux. Back to installing Ubuntu again. Although i was getting found of Red Hat. cba to try to fix it in the Konsole.

Reply to radnor

radnor wrote :

Vista doesnt support OpenGL ? that i didnt know. Good god, i should tweak my XP Vmware aswell.


*quick fact check*

Quote :

Hardware-accelerated OpenGL is fully supported on Windows Vista with the Windows Aero compositing desktop user experience - just as with Direct3D.


http://www.opengl.org/pipeline/article/vol003_9/ :hello:

Reply to homerdog

jaydeejohn wrote :

ATI hasnt done anything to lead the way. The way, DX10 was what the 2900XT was capable of. But, M$ changed the standard, because nVidia couldnt make a full DX10 card, so they omitted several abilities/standards so nVidia could still be in the game. The 2900 was fully capable, not leading the way. DX10.1 is just the rest of DX10, and unfortunately nVidia still is non-compliant



Yep to be honest i just couldnt beleive this back when i first found out about it, but its the same old story, cant restrict the consumer base so we will screw someone else over so that our sales are ok. Thats the reason ATI had such a hard time competing. They made a card to the spec and Nvidia couldnt so MS changed the rules and ATI were left with a card that worked on a differant set of rules to the new ones.
Mactronix

Reply to mactronix

And once again, heres the proof. M$ does this alot, the problem here is, ATI/AMD didnt really need it at the time , to happen to them like it did. But, ATI has 2 gens of DX10.1 out, and currently working on their 3rd. Link to the M$ quandry http://blogs.msdn.com/ptaylor/arch [...] -dx10.aspx

------------------------------ I went drifting, thru the capitols of tin, where men cant walk and cant freely talk, and sons turn their fathers in
Reply to jaydeejohn
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > DX 10.1, any1 getting excited over? I'm not:S
Go to:

There are 532 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them