Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 9800GX2, 9800GTX, or wait..?

9800GX2, 9800GTX, or wait..?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 9800GX2, 9800GTX, or wait..?

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!

Ask the community Add a reply

Bottom Search this thread

Hey everyone, I own a 8800GTS 512 G92 graphics card from EVGA and my 90 day step up offer ends in mid June (or mid July if I plan on getting the GX2). My question is to you at tomshardware however is if I should step up to the GTX for 10$ + shipping, or wait untilEARLY summer rolls around and get the GX2 for ~260$ + shipping.

The GTX (I can't get a superclocked or KO model from EVGA since their offer does not allow it), from my limited technical understanding is only slightly better than my 8800GTS but is definitely a cheap cheap upgrade. The GX2 does look pretty awesome but it's clocks on the spec sheet I read are slower that the GTS and GTX.

Anyway, my other option is to just wait it out until May/June or wait until the 9900's come out (which hopefully won't be too expensive..)

Thanks in advance for any reads/replies.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by wart thumbed on 04-16-2008 at 10:02:09 PM

Add a reply

Id wait for something that will give much better benchmark than the 9800 GX2 and GTX. To me the improvement over the 8800 GTX and GTX Ultra is mediocre. I'd really like to see how the ATI 4xxx serie will do and hopefully the next real upgrade from Nvidia.

Reply to ThrillerGTX

oh wait for the RV770s...they'll be out in early june... the 98x are very underwhelming

Message quoted 1 times

------------------------------ Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
Reply to mihirkula

mihirkula wrote :

oh wait for the RV770s...they'll be out in early june... the 98x are very underwhelming

Wow I just read about the RV770 and the upcoming ATI 48xx's and it sounds awesome!

If I did manage to get my hands on an ATI card when ti comes out would it be compatible with my ASUS P5k-E motherboard and Q6600?

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6813131225

P5K-E

Reply to wart thumbed

wart thumbed wrote :

My question is to you at tomshardware however is if I should step up to the GTX for 10$ + shipping

correct me if im wrong (and im sure someone will)
9800GX2 > 8800Ultra >8800GTX > 9800GTX > 8800GTS

for $10 + shipping i would upgrade.... assumning your shipping costs are reasonable

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to grieve

I would wait for the release of the ATI 48xx since it might prove a better alternative and if not....will at least make other video card's prices drop

Reply to samal90

Thanks for all the replies, however, would an ATI 48xx work on my given motherboard and processor specs? (listed above)

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to wart thumbed

At the moment i have the same crisis as you because im stuck with a 7300 Light Edition which is terrible. I cant even play NFS:Underground 2 on high and that game is oooooollllddddddd. Im going to get the 9800GX2 in 2 weeks hopefully

If you want a graphics card now get a 9800gx2, since you listed it i assume you can aford it. simply becuase it's the best on the market at the moment and it doesn't matter when people say "your card is going to get discontinued soon", every piece of hardware is going to go through the same fate sooner or later.

If you choose to wait you can do so that's if you have patience. I personally think there isn't much point in that because, probably what is going to happen once the 99xx series has been released and you spend good money on it, NV will probably announce another newer card. and when you get the newer card NV is probably going announce another one, basically it's never ending and patience is not an option for me but your view might be different ofcourse.

Good Luck making a choice, I made mine

Reply to 3086na

wart thumbed wrote :

Thanks for all the replies, however, would an ATI 48xx work on my given motherboard and processor specs? (listed above)

Does anyone know about this?

Reply to wart thumbed

grieve wrote :

correct me if im wrong (and im sure someone will)
9800GX2 > 8800Ultra >8800GTX > 9800GTX > 8800GTS

for $10 + shipping i would upgrade.... assumning your shipping costs are reasonable

Maybe at 2560x1600 and stock speeds.

The 9800GTX overclocks very well. It might have less memory bandwidth but at resolutions lower than 2560x1600 this is compensated for by the massive core and shader clockspeed advantage.

I'd put it as 9800GX2 > 9800GTX > 8800GTS 512 > 8800Ultra > 8800GTX

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to darkstar782

A 9800GX2 is basically 2x8800GTS's... sli performance if your're lucky

wait for the summer when the new hardware comes out... either buy the new card or get a 'out-of-date' card cheaper

Reply to marneus

Yeah an ATi card should work fine on your mobo.
Personally, assuming shipping costs are reasonable, I'd chop in the GTS for a GTX and then see how the ATi series pans out. It's a good upgrade for $10 and if the ATi series looks good, you could get rid of your card and prob not lose too much on it, considering it'd only be a couple of months old

------------------------------ 6000+ Stock, GA M57SLi-S4, XFX 8800GTX's SLi Stock, 4Gb Corsair PC6400 DHX, CoolerMaster 850W, 36Gb Raptor boot drive, 2x150Gb Raptor's in RAID 0 - XFX RAID controller & 300Gb Seagate. PowerBook G4 12" 1.5GHz, Go5200 64mb, 768mb RAM, 80Gb HD, SuperDrive.
Reply to LukeBird

Wart Thumbed... yes the new ATI cards would work very well with your mobo and q6600.

------------------------------ Intel E6750 * Gigabyte GA-P35-DS3L * Galaxy 8800GT 512mb 620MHz* Corsair VX450 * 2GB Transcend 667* 2x120GB Seagate SATA * Altec Lansing ATP3*
Reply to mihirkula

just wait for the 9900 series to come out

Reply to Nvidiafanboy

Personally, I just upgraded from a pair of Asus 8600GTs (can you tell I didn't do much research before purchasing?) in SLI to an EVGA 9800GTX and couldn't be happier.

I intend to pick up a 9900 when they come out then step-up the 9800 for SLI, assuming it's worthwhile with my 16x10 resolution monitor.

Reply to Jaevric

darkstar782 wrote :

I'd put it as 9800GX2 > 9800GTX > 8800GTS 512 > 8800Ultra > 8800GTX

OMG that’s so wrong...if we are talking performance and Nvidia cards only.

9800GX2 is #1 for sure, no question....
8800Ultra is #2 for sure, no question....

8800GTX IS better then a 8800gts in performance, maybe not bang for the buck, but it is the better performer.

the only real question is if a 9800GTX is better then a 8800GTX, I am sure if it matched the 8800 in memory 9800 would for sure be better then the 8800.

Reply to grieve

No I disagree.

Clicky

Looking here you can see, at resolutions of 1920x1200 and lower, the 9800GTX has the advantage over the 8800Ultra in almost every test.

Like I said, at 2560x1600 the lower memory bandwidth becomes an issue, but its still pretty close.

8800GTS 512 is so close to 9800GTX it makes hardly any difference.

Both overclock well, unlike 8800Ultra which is at its limit.

8800GTX is kinds sucky tbh, I'd swap my three for two 8800GTS 512s if I could

Message quoted 1 times

Reply to darkstar782

I'd say wait...the 8800 GTS is a pretty bomb card (G92).

------------------------------ Folding@HOME Team: 163116

http://pid.us.playstation.com//user/L1qu1dat1on.jpg

Lapped CPU

http://valid.canardpc.com/cache/banner/501789.png

Reply to L1qu1d

Your best bet is to wait. According to this xbit news release, Nvidia is going to release their next gen card this summer.

So wait a little longer.

http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/video [...] essor.html

------------------------------ 3 more years to get my BSEE @ UNH

darkstar782 wrote :

I went to you link and counted the actual "wins/losses" in every single frame 9800GTX vs. Ultra Below were the results:

9800GTX - 10 win
Ultra - 12 win
Tie -2

-------------------
You said
“8800GTS 512 is so close to 9800GTX it makes hardly any difference.”

- First the 8800GTS isn’t even listed on your link.
- 8800GTS is slower then a 8800GTX (barely and not on all tests),
- 8800GTS is DEFINATLY slower then the Ultra, based on the common knowledge that the Ultra is faster then 8800GTX.

If the GTS is ALMOST as fast as 8800GTX which IS slower then an Ultra, which is comparable to a 9800GTX …how do you figure the 8800GTS is comparable to the 9800GTX??????

Based on the facts I listed above remind me how a 8800GTS is comparable to a 9800GTX???!!!!
We are not talking $ or bang for the buck… just speed.

Reply to grieve

go to this link,
@ the top choose "overall games FPS"
after everything loads up then @the bottom choose "view all products"

http://www.tomshardware.com/charts [...] 6,581.html

***this is a pretty old list and i just noticed that the GTS listed are not 500mb... the old model GTS get rocked!

Message edited by grieve on 04-22-2008 at 09:28:37 PM

Reply to grieve

here is some comparisons with 8800gtx / 8800gts and the 9800GTX...

http://www.hardwarezone.com/articl [...] cid=3&pg=5

going simply by specs and results not "bang for your buck" i stand by my previous statments... but would swap the 9800GTX and 8800GTX

9800GX2 > 8800Ultra >9800GTX > 8800GTX > 8800GTS

In the link listed above, the Ultra beat 9800GTX/8800GTX and GTS in almost every single test.

Reply to grieve

9800GTX and 8800GTS 512 - the difference between these two cards is just 25MHz core, 63MHz shader, and 260MHz RAM. While the RAM difference is moderate, the other two are so close as to be insignificant when the 8800GTS 512 "OC editions" often run at speeds in the realm of 700MHz core - 25MHz FASTER than 9800GTX.

8800GTX is not all that overclockable. 8800Ultra even less so. I'd still take 9800GTX or 8800GTS 512 over either because both these cards are pretty decent overclockers.

The one weakness of G92 over G80 is memory bandwidth, which shows in high resolutions and high AA situations.

Alot of the benchmarks we have both found show the differences to be pretty damn small tbh..

But in the link I posted, discounting 2560x1600...

On 10 occasions 9800GTX (non SLi) beats 8800Ultra by at least 5 FPS. A few of these are significant.

On none, does the 8800 Ultra beat the 9800GTX by at least 5 FPS.

Although to be fair I only looked at that one page.

I think you can probably find benchmarks to support most points of view on the web... I do remember some sites saying x2900XT was way better than 8800Ultra.... which is obviously not true.

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by darkstar782 on 04-22-2008 at 10:51:08 PM

Reply to darkstar782

darkstar782 wrote :

That is comparing apples to oranges..
How can compare an OC'd GTS to a stock 9800GXT especially when reports say the 9800GTX runs cooler then a GTS??

Reply to grieve

Lets just agree to disagree because this is a silly argument

But even if you think the 8800Ultra is slightly faster, given the pricing of the two cards you have to say 9800GTX is a much better buy - if 8800 Ultra is better its not by much, and its nearly twice the price!

Reply to darkstar782

Dude! Your 8800GTS(G92) is good enough for now! Few months at least.
Need not get the 9800s.
Wait for the 9900s or the 4800s, then decide.
Have a good day mate.

------------------------------ Needs a job...
Reply to romulus47plus1

Ask the community Add a reply

Tom's Hardware > Forum > Graphic & Displays > Graphics Cards > 9800GX2, 9800GTX, or wait..?

Go to:

Help |
Forum rules

There are 552 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Page generated in 0.589 seconds

Please mind

You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months.
If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.

Add a reply Cancel

Focus On

9800GX2, 9800GTX, or wait..?

Forum Graphic & Displays : Graphics Cards - 9800GX2, 9800GTX, or wait..?

Please mind