Sign in with
Sign up | Sign in
Your question

3870 HD running crossfire

  • Graphics Cards
  • Graphics
Last response: in Graphics & Displays
April 18, 2008 10:55:31 AM

Hello all, new here didnt see this posted b4, I just recieved 2 Sapphire 3870 HD cards from NewEgg, took out mt 2 x1950pro's uninstalled the old drivers, installed the new drivers for XP 64bit 3870 series. ran 3dmark pro with one/ single card results were 9044 marks (impressive), then installesd the other card re-ran 3dmark and the results were 11452, good but not what I expected, any advice on getting better scores/ marks, NOT looking to overclock my pc in any way I want to run stock, my rig below...

OS: Win XP Pro SP2 64 Bit
Board: MSI K9A Platinum Crossfire ATI 3200 Chipset
RAM: 4GIG Patriot Extreme DDR2 800MHz
CPU: AMD Athlon 6400+ 64x2 3.2 GHz
Hard drives: (2) WD Caviar 250 GB
Graphics cards: (2) 3870 512mb “Sapphire” Running Crossfire
PSU: Antec TruePower Quattro 850 watt
Burners: (2) Sony/Nec 7170A
Chassis Gigabyte 3D Aurora Tower
Sound Card: Creative labs X-Fi SoundBlaster Xtreme Gamer
Keyboard: Saitek Eclipse
Mouse: Logitek Mx518
SENNHEISER PC161 3.5mm Connector Circumaural Headset

More about : 3870 running crossfire

April 18, 2008 11:09:53 AM

Sounds pretty good. My system with one GTX gets about 10900ish in XP Pro, with SLi I get around 13000. As you can see, everything in my case is stock, but I found tightening the RAM timings made a difference. I tightened them to 4-4-4-12 @ 2.0V and that improved the score. Other than that, assuming it bashes games (which I'm sure you do! :D ) be happy! :bounce: 
April 18, 2008 2:06:40 PM

well had to ask, I expected more due to the results of one card, none the less not bad, thanks.
Related resources
April 18, 2008 2:15:07 PM

My 3DMark06 scores are in the same ballpark - not bad, but I was hoping for more. Haven't had a chance to tweak the system yet, but still...
April 18, 2008 5:29:56 PM

Hmm that score does seem fairly low for a XP setup. My previous comp was almost identical, it was an oc'ed 6000 to 3.5Ghz and that setup took me on Vista 64 to 13/14k. Now i have the same cards not clocked with an oc'ed E8400 and hit 18739. So it most likely is your CPU not giving your gfx cards as much room as they need to breath.
April 18, 2008 6:44:22 PM

MrsBytch, no its the same 3dmark06,
closed_deal what make u think its my CPU? if so what can I do?
April 18, 2008 9:19:28 PM

My rig atm is the same bar the CPU only reason i think it's your problem. As for what you can do well you can overclock but that goes against your no overclock statement so i guess cpu an mobo upgrade is the only other way.

To be honest if your gaming a 22" screen or less you'll be running games at almost max anyway. The only reason i upgraded was because i wanted to get past the 4Ghz barrier :)  and the purchase of my 24" Sam'y.

Ah another thought, I'm unsure of your experience with 3DMark, but to get the highest scores you need to go into Catalyst Control Center and set all the 3D options to let the application decide, all the sliders to performance and disable Adaptive AA. Remember after benching to reset all these as they can affect your in-game gfx i.e game options high but visually it'll be poor.