Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » How bad of a bottleneck?
 

How bad of a bottleneck?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : How bad of a bottleneck?
 
Profile: member
More Information

Hello,
I have built a system but its running not as good as I expected. I hope its just the CPU. I have;
Video Card - EVGA 8800GTS (512)
RAM - 2GB DDR2 800mhz CL4 (Running at CL5 now though)
Motherboard - Asus maximus formula X38
Powersupply - 620 watt Corsair
Hard drive - 160GB hitachi
CPU - 1.8GHZ Pentium Dual core (E2160)
O/S - Vista Ultimate 64bit

I played Lord of the rings online and it was slowing down alot on high settings. I wanted to get a Q9450 but its not out yet so I got this CPU for now until it comes out. I really hope its the CPU because eveything else in my system seems fine to me. I did try to overclock it with the Asus software to 2.1 GHZ but it was hitting 57C in games. That was after 10 minutes so i'm guessing it would go alot highier. I know overclocking from the BIOS is much better but I don't have the time to learn. I will when I get the Q9450 though so then it will be worth overclocking. Please tell me its my CPU slowing the game down.

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Laphroaig.. now that is a taste to remember
Profile: addict
More Information

Yes it's a CPU bottleneck.

With your current rig setup your hardware should be well up to the task of ~40% oc. 57C is sod all say 70ish then yeah thats hot, but run orthos for 5-10 mins ans that'll get her fired up to max temp.

It'll be good oc practice for your upgrade, just don't use software to o/c. The BIOS is always the best place to start clocking from. It doesn't take much thought and once you start it's hard to stop anyway. It's like a mild addiction.. i go away from this comp for a while then think when i get back hmmm maybe i could tighten the RAM a bit or think i can get an extra 1+ on my FSB without putting anymore vcore. I know it sounds geeky even for a Computer forum, but the sense of achievement after a successful o/c is imo better than the escape of sailors on the 2nd or 3rd time :P.

Profile: member
More Information

I want to do it but i'm a bit unsure, just incase I set something too high and damaged anything.

Laphroaig.. now that is a taste to remember
Profile: addict
More Information

Vcore is safe to 1.5v
Ram is safe with a 0.2v increase on default
Max Temp cpu 70-75
Max Temp NB 60-75

The only way i've knackered an overclock via self learning is
1) updating the BIOS
2) blowing the NB

The trick is to only make one change at a time so when you panic and it all goes wrong you can rem what it was you last changed. When you mess about you'll catch on quick about certain problems .ie when there's a lack of vcore or the ram isn't setup correctly. The guides on this forum are good read through a few times before doing anything just to give you a cursory background on what your doing.

P.S if you blow summit it smells :P nah you'll be hard touched to blow anything...

Sniper
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

Dark Comet wrote :

Hello,
I have built a system but its running not as good as I expected. I hope its just the CPU. I have;
Video Card - EVGA 8800GTS (512)
RAM - 2GB DDR2 800mhz CL4 (Running at CL5 now though)
Motherboard - Asus maximus formula X38
Powersupply - 620 watt Corsair
Hard drive - 160GB hitachi
CPU - 1.8GHZ Pentium Dual core (E2160)
O/S - Vista Ultimate 64bit

 

I played Lord of the rings online and it was slowing down alot on high settings. I wanted to get a Q9450 but its not out yet so I got this CPU for now until it comes out. I really hope its the CPU because eveything else in my system seems fine to me. I did try to overclock it with the Asus software to 2.1 GHZ but it was hitting 57C in games. That was after 10 minutes so i'm guessing it would go alot highier. I know overclocking from the BIOS is much better but I don't have the time to learn. I will when I get the Q9450 though so then it will be worth overclocking. Please tell me its my CPU slowing the game down.


Bad combination. NEVER OVERCLOCK THROUGH WINDOWS/SOFTWARE!next you need a better cooler to Overclock. The E2160/2180 can easily hit 3Ghz. Also makesure the HSF is mounted properly.


Message edited by Shadow703793 on 04-19-2008 at 12:34:54 AM

---------------
E2180 @3.2Ghz + P35DS3L +8400GS (700/475 OC)
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3268/2588429538_b3c41b29c3.jpg
Profile: member
More Information

I hope I don't. My case doesn't really have very good cooling. Its a cheap case but I added a 120mm fan (2000RPM) to the back to reduce heat. Will add some more fans soon. I'll read up on overclocking soon. Thanks for the help.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

i think shadow meant for you to get a better heatsink for your cpu as the stock intel heatsinks suck the ####

and you would need a better heatsink for your Q9450 any way as quads tend to run hotter than duals

some thing like a thermalright ultra 120 extreme or any other decent tower cooler should do the trick

Profile: member
More Information

Yeah I will get a better heatsink fan soon. My south bridge is running at like 45C when i'm hardly doing anything!


  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Graphics Cards » How bad of a bottleneck?

Go to:
 

Google Ads
Ad
News

80 nm may be transitional process in DRAM migration to 70 nm

Published on September 18, 2006

DRAM makers using either trench or stack technology seem to be facing a bottleneck on their migration to 70 nm from 90 nm processes, and are putting out 80 nm products as a transitional process in the meantime, according to industry sources. Read more

PCM developed by IBM, Macronix and Qimonda can reach sub-20nm geometries

Published on December 01, 2006

Macronix International Company (MXIC) announced on November 29 that its co-developed phase change memory (PCM) with IBM and Qimonda has proven to be applicable in sub-20nm geometries, indicating that the present physical barriers of NOR flash production on 65nm can be overcome. Read more

Intel Nehalem's Market Named Leaked to be Core i7

Published on August 11, 2008

If the rumors are to be correct, the Intel Core i7 and Intel Core i7 Extreme Edition processors will officially be announced August 11 with an expected launch date of Q4 2008. Read more

Graphics processors supercharge everyday apps

Published on June 30, 2005

Originally developed to remove a massive processing workload from the CPU, some scientists examine how the graphics processors can accelerate non-graphic applications as well. The Geometric Algorithms for Modeling, Motion, and Animation (GAMMA) Research Group at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, reported this week that Nvidia's 7800 GTX reference card increased the speed of test applications by up to 35x. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

Part 4: Avivo HD vs. PureVideo HD

Published on September 29, 2008

The 780G chipset/Radeon HD 3200 and the MCP78S chipset/GeForce 8200 provide the first integrated graphics solutions that can accelerate Blu-ray playback. We dig deep into how well they work with high-quality Blu-ray 1080p video playback. Read more

Four GeForce 9600 GT Cards Compared

Published on September 26, 2008

Manufacturers really love the first Geforce 9. The graphic chip is fast, the cards are inexpensive, and some retailers offer more than ten variations. Read more

Maxtor's Shared Storage Does NAS At Home

Published on September 25, 2008

What do you do with all the data you collect at home? Network attached storage is the solution. We test Maxtor's Shared Storage II and find that it is also suitable for use in small businesses. Read more

SLI & Centrino 2: Gaming Laptops Battle

Published on September 24, 2008

Take four gaming laptops. Arm two of them with SLI and make the others Centrino 2-compatible. You're looking at a high-end collection of the latest mobile technology battling it out for benchmark supremacy and your hard-earned dollars. Read more