Ad
News

Alienware announces desktop PC with Intel's latest quad-core processor

Published on January 11, 2007

Alienware said it "will" launch Intel's second quad-core desktop processor, the 2.4 GHz Core 2 Quad Q6600, on its Area-51 7500 desktop system. Read more

CES 2007: Intel rolls out new quad-core processor Core 2 Quad Q6600

Published on January 08, 2007

Intel is enjoying its lead in the current microprocessor market and today announced more CPUs with four cores. There are three new quad-cores altogether, one desktop processor and two chips for entry-level servers. Read more

Intel Adds 3 New Value CPUs

Published on September 02, 2008

Intel has updated its pricing sheet for processors Monday and although prices have not changed, three new value processors have been added Read more

Intel Fine Tunes Processor Pricing, Increases Pressure On AMD

Published on July 22, 2008

Santa Clara (CA) - Intel's latest round of processor price represents a very subtle adjustment of prices the market widely seems to have accepted. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on December 29, 2008

Unsurprisingly, hardware prices have dropped since our System Builder Marathon last month, which means we have access to more processing power at our same $625 entry-level price point for gamers. Come check out the configuration Paul put together! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Q6600 or E8200?
 

Q6600 or E8200?




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Q6600 or E8200?
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Hello,
I am to decide between E8200 and Q6600.
OC is my first need and also I want to know even bus1066 make the Q6600 inferior to E8200's bus (1333) or not?

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Padawan Eater
Profile: addict
More Information

on the contrary, the 1066FSB allows for more OC headroom as there is more space to overlclock. For example, a 10 multi and a 266 bus speed produce 2.66Ghz. 8 multi and a 333 bus speed also gives you 2.66Ghz. The extra bus speed makes no difference in performance, BTW: http://www.extremetech.com/article [...] 071,00.asp

 

So a higher multi is better because a few bumps on the bus speed will get you a higher clock, basic math. The q6600 has a 9 multi, with a 1066 FSb, all you gotta do is raise it to 1333 and you've got 3Ghz. So, 266->333 yields 2.4Ghz->3.0Ghz. The difference in bus speed was 67mhz. the yield was 600mhz on the clock. now if you up the e8200 bus speed by the same amount, 67mhz you'll get 400mhz, or 1600Mhz FSB. now that would yield:2.6Ghz-?3.2Ghz. Diff:540mhz on the clock speed. A noticeable difference. Bottom line: shoot for the Q6600, plus its quad.


Message edited by DarthPiggie on 05-14-2008 at 07:39:50 PM

---------------
Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.
"Dreams are like rainbows, only idiots chase them.
Profile: stranger
More Information

get a Q9450

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

It also depends of the limit of your Motherboards FSB. If you MB spec. is 1333 FSB it may or may not be capable of 1600FSB or >

OOPS. Sorry. +1 for the Q6600

Message quoted 2 times
Message edited by rsetter1 on 05-14-2008 at 08:08:02 PM
Profile: journeyman
More Information

rsetter1 wrote :

It also depends of the limit of your Motherboards FSB. If you MB spec. is 1333 FSB it may or may not be capable of 1600FSB or >

OOPS. Sorry. +1 for the Q6600



Thanks for your replies guys.
My MB is ABIT IX38 Quad GT. So I do not have limitation toward bus support(it supports 1600)
My limitation is money as Q6600 and E8200 are close, but the 9xxx series are a bit expensive for me. I already have an E6550 and I wonder if it makes a good difference for me to go for Q6600 , because I have the opprtunity to upgrade just
NOW.

Padawan Eater
Profile: addict
More Information

rsetter1 wrote :

It also depends of the limit of your Motherboards FSB. If you MB spec. is 1333 FSB it may or may not be capable of 1600FSB or >

OOPS. Sorry. +1 for the Q6600


so you run out of FSB headroom faster on the 1333 Wolfdale.


---------------
Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.
I buy amd 2 savu $ on ur intel
Profile: old hand
More Information

I would say if you want an extreme amount of overclock, get the e8200. If you want to video edit, play games like crysis and get a decent amount of overclock, get the q6600. If it was me I would get the q6600, only because more multi-threaded games and apps are on the horizon.


---------------
AMD X2 6000+ @3.2Ghz | Asus crosshair | 4gb corsair xms ddr2 800 | BFG 8800GTS (g92)x2 SLI 805/1080 | SoundMax HD | (160gb)x2 sata in raid 0 | 500 gb sata | Lian-Li PC-6070 | antec 850W PSU | thermaltake water cooling | Vista 64bit | LG 24" | Logitech 5.1
Padawan Eater
Profile: addict
More Information

ryanthesav wrote :

I would say if you want an extreme amount of overclock, get the e8200. If you want to video edit, play games like crysis and get a decent amount of overclock, get the q6600. If it was me I would get the q6600, only because more multi-threaded games and apps are on the horizon.


most ppl get their q6600 at 3.6Ghz on aftermarket air cooling, and thats only 400Mhz bus speed. To get 3.6 on the e8200, you would need the bus speed at 475, quite high. Also

 

Q6600-220$
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115017
E8400-200$
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Prod [...] 6819115037

 

So the e8400 has a 9 multi, is better than the e82, and costs less than the q66


Message edited by DarthPiggie on 05-15-2008 at 04:08:01 AM

---------------
Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Q6600 or E8200?

Go to:
 

Google Ads