Best specs for multimedia CPU

creamoreo

Distinguished
May 14, 2008
3
0
18,510
im going to build a cpu for multimedia for my sister and i want to give her the best specs i can so here's my idea

IntelQ6600

Motherboard: MSI P35neo-F


Vid Card: Inno 3D 8800GT 512Mb 256bit

HD: seagate Barracuda 500G

memory: Kingston 2gig

Enermax 535 fan EG565P-VE

:sweat: im wondering if msi is really a great board they say asus is also good but what is the best for multimedia.. she will use illustrator,photoshop,maya etc..

and also i dont have any idea on power cooling.. anything you can add or replace in my specs?

thanks

 
Enermax is at worst case scenario a tier 3 psu so you most likely are in good shape with that choice. I like Corsair and you can usually get a good deal on one of thier models.

What OS are you going to install? If your installing Vista 64 bit or even XP 64 I would recommend to go ahead and get 4 gigs of ram if you can swing it.

You would also do well with an 8800 GTS 512mb card.

I prefer ASUS or Gigabyte motherboards. They have been more stable and dependable for me than any other brands so far...
 

creamoreo

Distinguished
May 14, 2008
3
0
18,510
im going to use a xp how about coooling system is it alright if i dont use any of it? how can i push my cpu to its fullest?
 

seboj

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2008
403
0
18,790


Eeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr.

[strike]You push your CPU to its "fullest" by using a good cooling system for one. But not using one.. I.. what do..[/strike]

I just don't know wtf you're saying right there. :heink:
 

mi1ez

Splendid
seboj, to clarify:



I'm going to use xp. How about a cooling system? Is it alright if I don't use any of it? How can I push my CPU to its fullest?

@OP

You WILL use a cooling system, it's just a question of which. We'll assume you're sticking with air. Stock HSFs are OK for basic use (heck mine took my Pentium D to 3.8) However a better cooling system, be it air, water, phase change, N2O(!); will allow further overclocking and quiter operation.
 
An e8200 would be 10% faster in PS than the q6600.

An e8400 would be 25% faster.

(SSE4 and faster FSB - PS & Ill no advantage with 4 cores)

More RAM and multiple HDDs is the way to go - beef up your disk I/O.

8800gt is really of no benefit, either - and a 8800gts even more so ...
 

mi1ez

Splendid


Forgive me for saying, but Photoshop is optimised for multiple cores and will run faster on a quad than a slightly faster dual.
 


No.

There are a few filters in PS that will run parallel threads. PS is not "optimized for multiple cores" (whatever that means).

Even an e6850 will whomp a q6600 by 25%.
 

seboj

Distinguished
Mar 31, 2008
403
0
18,790
Actually, PS has been designed for multi-threading for years.

OP, if she's going to be doing picture editing, rendering, flash, animation, HD movie watching, etc, then yes - quad core is really the way you should go.

You should ask her how much space she needs, 500gb seems a little low. My fiancee is a professional photographer who shoots in RAW, so I'm having to purchase 1 tb of space for my upcoming build. You can always go RAID 0 to speed up your input/output, but her work sounds important, so you might not want to risk the data loss. RAID 0+1 just plain gets expensive with higher storage amounts.

Kingston is reliable ram - you might want to consider doubling up to 4gb.
 
Photoshop CS 3
Filtering from a 69 MB TIF-Photo

C2D e8200 = 112 sec

C2D e8400 = 100 sec

C2D e8500 = 94 sec

C2D e6850 = 99 sec

C2Q q6600 = 122 sec


http://www.tomshardware.com/charts/cpu-charts-2007/photoshop-cs-3,384.html?
 

creamoreo

Distinguished
May 14, 2008
3
0
18,510
about the raid our professor taught us about it but i dont know how to put it.. i have a background about d raids and what they do but putting it in a pc i have no idea -_-!

hmmm ill make my ram 4 gig ^_^