Ad
News

Graphics: $100 GeForce 9600GSO by Forsa, Passively Cooled 8800GT by ECS

Published on June 04, 2008

There isn’t much news on the graphics side at the Computex showfloors, as both AMD and Nvidia are not yet ready with their next generation products. Yet we found two interesting products. Read more

CeBIT 2008: OLED Displays from Samsung

Published on March 05, 2008

Samsung is introducing a number of OLED displays and since they can do without backlighting, they are extremely thin and impress with excellent colour rendition. Read more

FSP Everest provides a Mountain of Power

Published on January 11, 2008

FSP displayed its latest high-amperage PC power supply, the semi-modular Everest Pro 1200. Read more

Intel "Nehalem" Performance Is "Touchy"

Published on June 04, 2008

While visiting Intel to take a look at its Nehalem processor, we noticed a 30-inch Dell LCD display with a PCB frame around the border. On the PCB, there were rows of LEDs on all four sides of the display. At first we thought it was simply an aesthetics Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on January 01, 2009

We’ve built, overclocked, and tested our $625, $1,250, and $2,500 performance machines. How will these three systems compare in overall performance and value? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $2,500 Enthusiast PC

Published on December 31, 2008

We’ve seen how far a moderately priced Core i7 system can take us and now we’re ready to assess the performance advantages of better cooling and a stronger graphics configuration. Will our upgrades be worth the money? Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Mid-Range PC

Published on December 30, 2008

We see how far $1,250 gets us when building a new Core i7-based system, and how it compares to last month’s similarly priced Core 2 Duo machine. Read more

SSDs Replacing HDDs Soon? Not A Chance

Published on December 29, 2008

Some say 2010 and even 2009 will be the year of SSDs. We think not. Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Nvidia » Extremely low performane in COD4 8800GT 174.74beta XP SP2
 

Extremely low performane in COD4 8800GT 174.74beta XP SP2




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Extremely low performane in COD4 8800GT 174.74beta XP SP2
 
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I am getting extremely low performance in COD4MW with a 8800GT at 1280x1024. Since I'm new to COD4, I only played the tutorial and first ship level. I got constant stuttering in tutorial and FPS was as low as 20-30. In the ship level I only got 10 FPS. Everything in the game is set to max except for AA and AF which are left to none.
However I'm fine in games like Crysis (all high, 0xAA 16xAF), Oblivion (HDR 8xSSAA 16xAF), and UT3 (4xAA 16xAF). The driver I'm using is 174.74 beta. I switched from 169.21 WHQL because of AA not being applied and broken game profiles in NV CP. I'm using Windows XP SP2.

my specs:
E6300 B2 @ 2.8GHz
EVGA Geforce 8800GT 650/950/1620
Gigabyte GA-965P-DS3 rev 1.0
PCP & C silencer 750W
OCZ GOLD XTC DDR2 800 2GB

Identify the problem for me please thanks.


Message edited by sam1 on 04-27-2008 at 03:43:07 AM
Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Padawan Eater
Profile: addict
More Information

very weird, since it doesnt seem to be hardware related i'd say a reinstall is in order. Either that or a defrag


---------------
Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.
Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

It's called a beta for good reasons. You're out of luck until official new drivers get here.


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Padawan Eater
Profile: addict
More Information

yea shes right revert back to old drivers


---------------
Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.
It's AMD or it's nothing
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Try and set the affinity to one cpu "0" when this game is running and see if it helps.

Open Task Manager
Righ-click on the partition.exe(COD.exe) process and choose "Set Affinity"
Check the CPU IDs (example CPU0, CPU1) that you want the process to run on.

Padawan Eater
Profile: addict
More Information

doubt that would do much, heck it might even hurt performance.


---------------
Do not fall prey to perceived obsolescence.
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Old 169.21 whql I was using had broken game profile and AA not being applied or doesn't go off when set to off in NV CP. See this thread:

 

http://forums.tweakguides.com/show [...] 135&page=2

 

I switched to 174.74 beta for that reason.


Message edited by sam1 on 04-27-2008 at 04:45:33 AM

---------------
E6300@2.8GHz 1.225V | GA-965P-DS3 Rev 1.0 | 8800GT 512MB 650/950/1620 | 7200.10 250GB | OCZ DDR2-800 5-5-5-12 2.0V | Coolermaster Centurion 5 | TTBT | PCP&C Silencer 750W
Profile: journeyman
More Information

I found that the problem is not that simple. When I played cryris, it was when I just turned on my PC. However after one day of usage, EVERY game slowed down a lot. Oblivion got FPS almost halved, and Crysis too. I think when I first played COD today it was when "it" already started happening. I.E. FPS in every games becomes very low. My card idles at 50C and load at around 70C, fan speed 65%. And CPU idles at 40-42C load at 52-55C using core temp.


---------------
E6300@2.8GHz 1.225V | GA-965P-DS3 Rev 1.0 | 8800GT 512MB 650/950/1620 | 7200.10 250GB | OCZ DDR2-800 5-5-5-12 2.0V | Coolermaster Centurion 5 | TTBT | PCP&C Silencer 750W
Nuke it, Nuke it good!
Profile: Eternal Poster
More Information

Well i've seen 174.xx break games already. so i am back on 169.21 I loose TV overscan, but at least my games play right.

 

You gonna have to make a call as to what more important AA vs performance.

 

Send nvidia a bug report so they can fix it on the next release. if they dont know, they can not fix it. Since they are trying to squeeze the Geforce 9 cards they seem to be forgetting about the 8 series. Let them know....

 

As for loosing performance after, make sure there is not junk running eating cpu power or any virus/spyware scan running(they run at the most pain in the a$s times).


Message edited by nukemaster on 04-27-2008 at 09:00:12 AM

---------------
http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/4269/inukexz9.png
http://tinyurl.com/26uxxb - Core2 Temp Guide? http://tinyurl.com/cj3pw - VGA power use?
http://tinyurl.com/5v55wk - Core2 Memory performance? http://tinyurl.com/6pmbke - SLI/Xfire?
Profile: old hand
More Information

in the settings set your graphics card to 'dual graphics card' i had a 8800gts 512mb and it lagged like **** **** and i enabled that after someone told me and then i got super high frame rates.. so give it a shot

Monkey wants to steal peaches
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

maverick7 wrote :

in the settings set your graphics card to 'dual graphics card' i had a 8800gts 512mb and it lagged like **** **** and i enabled that after someone told me and then i got super high frame rates.. so give it a shot


[:mousemonkey:2] If setting the game config to dual card works regardless of only having one card then it gives 'The way it's meant to be played' a slightly darker undertone. :whistle:


---------------
Forums are like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhoea -- massive, difficult to
redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind-boggling amounts of excrement
when you least expect it.
Profile: stranger
More Information

I have an Asus EN8800GT and a Q6600 chip, both card and chip are clocked at stock and both COD4 and Crysis play fine in XP, absolutely no hassles with frame rates, playing at 1280x1024 with all settings at high, max settings for COD4.

Maybe you have a virus?

Profile: Forum Fixture
More Information

The Lads wrote :

I have an Asus EN8800GT and a Q6600 chip, both card and chip are clocked at stock and both COD4 and Crysis play fine in XP, absolutely no hassles with frame rates, playing at 1280x1024 with all settings at high, max settings for COD4.

 

Maybe you have a virus?

 


That would be a lot of people with virus...
It's a beta, it's to be expected. :p


---------------
Q6600@3.6ghz, GA-EX38-DS4 motherboard, 8gb 800mhz ddr2 4-3-3-12, 8800GTS(g92)@780mhz, 1TB + 1.5TB hdds, 850watt psu
Profile: addict
More Information

It's the beta drivers. Downgrade to 169.25.

Profile: journeyman
More Information

I seem to have found the problem. It's because of CS 1.6. I d/led it from a link a friend gave to me. When I play cs 1.6, and then play other games like Crysis and Oblivion, these games ran real bad. (Other games like FEAR and Unreal 3 are not demanding enough for me to see a serious performance drop) Now I reinstalled COD4MW and upgraded to 1.4 patch and now it seems to be running normally. So i guess its the cs 1.6 i dled that caused the problem. I ll just forget it for now.


---------------
E6300@2.8GHz 1.225V | GA-965P-DS3 Rev 1.0 | 8800GT 512MB 650/950/1620 | 7200.10 250GB | OCZ DDR2-800 5-5-5-12 2.0V | Coolermaster Centurion 5 | TTBT | PCP&C Silencer 750W

  Tom's Hardware Forums » Graphic & Displays » Nvidia » Extremely low performane in COD4 8800GT 174.74beta XP SP2

Go to: