Well, hello everyone. This is my first time trying to build a computer myself, and i am very looking forward to it.
Anyways, i'd like to build a computer with about $1200 and i've figured out some hardwares. and here they are
MOBO = MSI K9NGM4-F V.2 AM2+/AM2 NVIDIA GeForce 7025 Micro ATX AMD Motherboard
Microsoft Windows Vista 32-Bit Home Premium for System Builders Single Pack DVD - OEM = $149
CPU FAN = Thermaltake CL-P0257 Blue orb II CPU Cooler for LGA775 & K8 - Retail 47.99
CPU = AMD Phenom 9850 BLACK EDITION 2.5GHz Socket AM2+ 125W Quad-Core Processor Model HD985ZXAGHBOX = 235
It will work, and is decent, but do you really need the Quad-Core? and the Phenoms have been said to have problems with some mobos.
I bet if you look around you can find a 9600GT for a bit cheaper. If you aren't gaming much. then you can go down to about $150 for a 9600GT. If you do game and that is what you want to do with this, I'd change to an 8800GT or 8800GTS over the 9600GT.
You can't take advantage of all the RAM if you use a 32-bit OS because it only registers 3.(something). You can use a 64-bit version of windows instead (or linux if you are a linux person).
You don't need the IDE DVD-ROM drive, It seems a bit redundant. You already have a SATA DVD drive that can also burn CDs and DVDs.
I personally am an intel person, so of course I am going to recommend switching to a core2duo (it could reduce the price from $20-40). You could also get a better mobo for cheaper beacause you aren't using SLI.
Don't forget your monitor!
(Oh, and to paste hyperlinks just copy the web adress and paste it as text. It will automatically change into a hyperlink.)
Message edited by sarahwingler on 04-18-2008 at 03:14:19 AM
Everything looks good. But just curious why get a AMD? You can easily get better performance for cheaper with a P35-DS3x/P35- P5K and a Q6600 for the same price. or if OCing leave the Phenom in dust.
Those are 512mb version, I suppose he/she wants the 1GB version. Anyway, 9600gt use the g94 core (half a g92 core oced), and is meant as a mid-range/budget gaming card. 1GB won't benefit it as much as more powerful cards, like 8800gt or G92 8800gts. The g94 gpu will have trouble running at the high resolution where 1GB memory becomes an advantage.
^1GB is not needed unless playing at REALLY high res, these are resolutions that this card won't be able to handle any way another reason is limited bus (256 bit).
^Well done . Depending on the game and resolution you won't be able to turn on all the eye candy. For example Crysis. If you are intrested in OCing checkout:
http://www.tomshardware.com/forum/ [...] erclocking
OP .... The 8800GT is avail for $159 at tigerdirect.com ... that should chop off a sizeable amount of damage....get it while it still avail
You'd get a very pretty performance with that setup.
Though you should know that for gaming the E8400 is a better option. So if you're going to gaming mostly go for the E8400...if you're going to be doing some vid editing/encoding then Q6600 would benefit you.
OP .... The 8800GT is avail for $159 at tigerdirect.com ... that should chop off a sizeable amount of damage....get it while it still avail
You'd get a very pretty performance with that setup.
Though you should know that for gaming the E8400 is a better option. So if you're going to gaming mostly go for the E8400...if you're going to be doing some vid editing/encoding then Q6600 would benefit you.
E8400 is better until more applications becomes quad optimized. Then quad core will wipe the floor with duals. Right now, only Lost Planet and Supreme Commander are the only ones quad optimized. They say Starcraft 2 will be too when it's released, but that's just rumor at this point. It all depends on how long you want to keep the machine.
You are about to answer a thread that has been inactive for more than 6 months. If you still wish to proceed, please ensure that your posting is original and does not duplicate or overlap any prior responses to this thread.