Ad
News

Analysts: 12" wafers to become mainstream by 2009

Published on February 15, 2005

This year, 12" silicon-wafer shipments are expected to account for 20 percent of global silicon-wafer shipments, up from 12% in 2004, according to Gartner Dataquest. Read more

Intel To Launch Calpella Notebook Platform In Q3 2009

Published on August 05, 2008

Intel's next-generation notebook platform (Calpella) is scheduled to launch in the third quarter of 2009. Read more

Planning On Buying A Nehalem PC For Christmas? Plan For Christmas 2009.

Published on August 21, 2008

San Francisco (CA) - News about the much anticipated Nehalem processor architecture coming out of this year's IDF Fall are not quite as comprehensive as expected and given the Q4 launch date of the first CPUs, the level of technical provided may be even disappointing for some. Read more

IDF: More 'Nehalem' Details, 6-cores

Published on August 19, 2008

Intel announced that the first Nehalem processors to be made available will be desktop processors (Core i7) and high-performance server products code-named Nehalem-EP. Read more

Latest Reviews & Articles

4GB Gets Cheap: 9 Dual-Channel Kits Compared

Published on December 01, 2008

Recent price drops have made 4 GB DDR2 dual-channel kits affordable for even the most cost-conscious buyers. We pushed nine models to their limits to determine best value for a broad range of users. Read more

System Builder Marathon: Performance & Value

Published on November 28, 2008

We tightened the budget on this month’s enthusiast-level system while loosening our belt for the low-cost gamer box by a similar percentage. Today we gauge the effect of these changes on performance and value and compare to last month's machines. Read more

System Builder Marathon: $1,250 Enthusiast PC

Published on November 27, 2008

On this, the second day of our System Builder Marathon, Don turns down the price tag of his mid-range build looking for a sweet spot just above the $1,000 marker. Let's see what sort of hardware he found for it! Read more

System Builder Marathon: $625 Gaming PC

Published on November 26, 2008

This month's System Builder Marathon is all about your feedback to us. We've revamped our entry-level and mid-range PCs with new price points. Let's kick things off with what we think is the best value at a $625 price point! Read more

  Tom's Hardware Forums » CPU & Components » CPUs » Nehalem goes mainstream in Q4 2009
 

Nehalem goes mainstream in Q4 2009




Word :   Username :  
 
Bottom
Author
 Thread : Nehalem goes mainstream in Q4 2009
 
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

...get your wallets out in the meantime

"According to sources close to a motherboard manufacturer, Nehalem CPU in its 1366 socket won't get to mainstream by volume or price until Q4 2009. This might sound shocking to many, as you might expect to upgrade to a quad-core mainstream Nehalem in mid 2009; and unfortunately it won’t happen, at least not for a few hundred Euros / Dollars.

Nehalem will definitely launch as an ultra high-end desktop and server part in Q4 2008 and it will take time until this marchitecture sinks to the attractive $200 to $300 price range.

Therefore, don't you worry about Intel's soon-to-be launched P45 boards and the LGA775 socket, as it will serve you good for some time to come. After all, P45 is a 65nm chipset, and hey, that is better than the 90nm P35, X38 and X48; at least it sounds like it."

http://www.fudzilla.com/index.php? [...] 1&Itemid=1

Related Product

Register or log in to remove.

Profile: enthusiast
More Information

Correction X48 is also 65nm, its the X48's only real improvement over the X38 as pretty much any X38 can do 1600mhz fsb. Some X38s even come with manufacturer support for 1600mhz fsb.

Forum's resident audiophile.
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Still don't think this'll stop me jumping on Nehalem as soon as it's released. I just hope that there's a decent single card GPU out by then.

Forum's resident audiophile.
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

YOOOOOOOOOOOOOKSHIRE!

No editing, No Signatures. What is next to go?
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Sorry JDocs but I was under the impression that the X48 is just a higher binned X38.
As such it uses the same manufacturing process as the X38.
The P45 is supposed to be the first chipset from Intel to be produced at 65nm.
If I am wrong, could you please provide me some links?

@OP,
Can't wait for the P45 :D
Even though it is just a midrange part, it still has very nice specs!

It will be nice to have Nehalem this year also but I had heard that Intel has blocked overclocking with the new system.
I wish I could remember where I had read it at.
I believe it had something to do with the on die memory controller validating the CPU speed with the NB clock generator.
Any attempt to overclock is automatically rejected by the offended clock generator.

Anyways, it should be interesting to see what happens with it at the end of the year!

Message quoted 1 times
Message edited by outlw6669 on 05-19-2008 at 12:22:49 PM

---------------
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
If it's not from Yorkshire it's sh1te
Profile: old hand
More Information

Don't you mean YOOOOOOOOOOORKSHIRE,

Devon is still tops though

Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

outlw6669 wrote :



It will be nice to have Nehalem this year also but I had heard that Intel has blocked overclocking with the new system.
I wish I could remember where I had read it at.
I believe it had something to do with the on die memory controller validating the CPU speed with the NB clock generator.
Any attempt to overclock is automatically rejected by the offended clock generator.



That is only on the LGA 1160 systems, which are the midrange and budget units. The high-end LGA 1366 units will allow overclocking. It makes some sense from a product positioning perspective as some low-end chips are simply high-end ones with a low multiplier set in their μcode. They OC the same but cost far less than higher-end parts in that case. It also makes people buy more expensive chipsets to overclock as well. I predict that this little tactic will have at best no effect on Intel's bottom line and at worst, it will lose them much of the enthusiast market. In any case, people who overclock low-end parts will go to AMD; whether or not it will hurt their bottom line depends on how fast Bloomfield is to Deneb. If Bloomfield is a bunch faster, then people will suck it up and pay Intel more for the non-crippled boards and Intel would break roughly even. If Bloomfield's slower, Intel will be hurt as the low-end overclockers that would have used the slower and (should be) cheaper Intel parts will have to go to AMD to get their OC fix.


---------------
UNIX is user-friendly- it's just picky who its friends are.

DRM is slowly killing personal computing, one Sony rootkit and TPM chip at a time.
No editing, No Signatures. What is next to go?
Profile: Honorary Poster
More Information

Thank you for the simple explanation.
It seems I need to do some more research to prepare myself for the launch.

I agree with your assessment of on Intel's overclocking block.
Unless a stock Bloomfield is faster than an overclocked Denab at the same price point they will be bleeding enthusiasts.
I doubt that it will have much of a large impact overall as the enthusiast market makes up only a small amount of their business.

Someone seems to be getting (possibly) over confident after the success of the Core arcitecture...


---------------
If the automobile had followed the same development cycle as the computer, a Rolls-Royce today would cost $100, get a million miles to the gallon, and explode once a year, killing everyone inside.
PSA
Profile: journeyman
More Information

Just wanted to add that i just saw a Nehalem demo today and Intel is hinting that the performance jump from core 2 - > nehalem will be similar to the performance jump from p4 -> core 2 arch.. Sounds pretty confident to me...:)

Profile: addict
More Information

bump

Profile: member
More Information

I can't wait for multi-processor Xeon Nehalems.

Hi, I'm Mark Erickson
Profile: nimble knuckle
More Information

This 2008 Q-whatever "launch" is going to make a lot of people cry. Nehalem is out there on a desolate island when it comes to competition...so pretty much they will be so over priced even OPEC will grab their @holes.

Profile: addict
More Information

"will be so over priced even OPEC will grab their @holes"

.....hehehe spot on. I can see myself upgrading in about mid 2010 when windows 7 is stable, Nehalem jumps to 16 cores and runs on a stable chipset, which I hope for godsake is a significant upgrade unlike what we've been seeing lately. I still don't think Nehalem is much of an advance in terms of frontier technology. I think whatever is post Nehalem will become the next significant landmark.

Alignment: Chaotic Intel
Profile: Faithful Poster
More Information

Nice, but I'm going still use XP and just love the almost instant booting! (as long as they don't start using EFI)

Profile: addict
More Information