Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Two new samsungs vs three wd blues for read only in raid 0

Two new samsungs vs three wd blues for read only in raid 0

Forum Storage : Hard Disks - Two new samsungs vs three wd blues for read only in raid 0

Tom's Hardware: Over 1.4 million members in 6 different countries available to answer all your high-tech questions. Sign up now! Its free!
Ask the community Add a reply
Word :    Username :           
 
JOOJOO1234   06-28-2009 at 06:22:02 AM

Which would be faster for read only... (sample streaming)

Two 32mb cache Samsung hd103uj 1tb sata drives in raid 0.

Three 8mb cache 320gb WD Blue's in Raid 0.

I know that three is better than one but the new samsung is so fast in read....

http://www.tomshardware.com/review [...] 730-8.html

Anybody positive enough about this to give me good advice about which to do?

Am using for music keyboard sample.. loading for piano samples and want maximum polyphony.

I could go ahead and buy another blue... and go four...

? This is my first thread at good old Toms Hardware Guide... so help a bro out. :D

Add a reply
Sponsored Links
Register or log in to remove.
MomoCC   06-29-2009 at 06:20:08 AM
- 0 +

Hey joojoo, I'd go for the Samsung if you just wanted speed. Though I'd rely on the WD drives, which have a better track record of reliability.

Reply to MomoCC
Ask the community Add a reply
Tom's Hardware > Forum > Storage > Hard Disks > Two new samsungs vs three wd blues for read only in raid 0
Go to:

There are 1025 identified and unidentified users. To see the list of identified users, Click here.

Forum map
Bestofmedia Forum ©
2000-2009 Bestofmedia Group
Page generated in 0.338 seconds
Sponsored links
  • Ask the community now
  • Publish
Ad
Related Topics
See all relatives topics
They won a badge
Join us in greeting them